Morphological integration and developmental progress during fish ontogeny in two contrasting habitats

Evolution and Development

Volumn 11, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 740-753

  Fischer Rousseau, Laurence ^a   Cloutier, Richard ^a   Zelditch, Miriam Leah ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À RIMOUSKI   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT; ECOMORPHOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; HABITAT QUALITY; JUVENILE; ONTOGENY; SALMONID;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE ANATOMY; DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENT; EVOLUTION; FISH; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METHODOLOGY; PHENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; TIME; TROUT; WATER FLOW;

ANATOMY, COMPARATIVE; ANIMALS; DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENT; EVOLUTION; FISHES; GENETIC VARIATION; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PHENOTYPE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TIME FACTORS; TROUT; WATER MOVEMENTS;

PISCES; SALVELINUS FONTINALIS;

EID: 70350516749     PISSN: 1520541X     EISSN: 1525142X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2009.00381.x     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Ackermann, R. R. Cheverud, J. M. 2002. Discerning evolutionary processes in patterns of tamarin (genus Saguinus) craniofacial variation. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 117 : 260 271.
2. Adriaens, D. Verraes, W. 2002. An empirical approach to study the relation between ontogeny, size and shape using geometric morphometrics. In P. Aert, C. D'Août, A. Herrel R. Van Damme (eds.). Topics in Functional and Ecological Vertebrate Morphology. Shaker Publishing, Maastricht, pp. 293 324.
3. Anderson, T. W. 1963. Asymptotic theory for principal components. Ann. Math. Stat. 34 : 122 148.
4. Atchley, R. Rutledge, J. J. 1980. Genetic components of size and shape. I. Dynamic components of phenotypic variability and covariability in the laboratory rat. Evolution 35 : 1161 1173.
5. Badyaev, A. V. Martin, T. E. 2000. Individual variation in growth trajectories: phenotypic and genetic correlations in ontogeny of the house finch (Carpodacus mexicanus). J. Evol. Biol. 13 : 290 301.
6. Balon, E. K. 1980. Early ontogeny of the brook charr, Salvelinus (Baione) fontinalis. In E. K. Balon (ed.). Charrs: Salmonids of the Genus Salvelinus. Kluwer Boston Inc., Hingham, pp. 631 666.
7. Balon, E. K. 1999. Alternative ways to become a juvenile or a definitive phenotype (and on some persisting linguistic offenses). Environ. Biol. Fishes 56 : 17 38.
8. Cheverud, J. M. 1982. Phenotypic, genetic and environmental integration in the cranium. Evolution 36 : 499 512.
9. Cheverud, J. M. 1996. Quantitative genetic analysis of cranial morphology in the cotton-top (Saguinus oedipus) and saddle-back (S. fuscicollis) tamarins. J. Evol. Biol. 9 : 5 42.
10. Dingerkus, G. Uhler, L. D. 1977. Enzyme clearing of Alcian blue stained whole small vertebrates for demonstrating cartilage. Stain Tech. 56 : 271 273.
11. Fischer-Rousseau, L., Chu, K. P. Cloutier, R. In press. Developmental plasticity in fish exposed to a water velocity gradient: a complex response. J. Exp. Zool. (Mol. Dev. Evol.).
12. Flury, B. 1988. Common Principal Components and Related Multivariate Models. Wiley, New York, 258pp.
13. Gisbert, E. 1999. Early development and allometric growth patterns in Siberian sturgeon and their ecological significance. J. Fish Biol. 54 : 852 862.
14. Goodall, C. 1991. Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. (Stat. Meth.) 53 : 285 339.
15. Grünbaum, T., Cloutier, R. Le François, N. R. 2008. Positive effects of exposure to increased water velocity on growth of newly-hatched Arctic charr, Salvelinus alpinus L. Aquac. Res. 39 : 106 110.
16. Grünbaum, T., Cloutier, R., Mabee, P. M. Le François, N. R. 2007. Early developmental plasticity and integrative responses in Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus): effects of water velocity on body size and shape. J. Exp. Zool. (Mol. Dev. Evol.) 308B : 396 408.
17. Hallgrímsson, B. 1999. Ontogenetic patterning of skeletal fluctuating asymmetry in rhesus macaques and humans: evolutionary and developmental implications. Int. J. Primatol. 20 : 121 151.
18. Hallgrímsson, B., Lieberman, D. E., Liua, W., Ford- Hutchínsonc, A. F. Jirikc, F. R. 2007. Evolution of covariance in the mammalian skull. In G. Bock J. Goode (eds.). Tinkering: the Microevolution of Development (Novartis Foundation Symposium 284). Wiley, Chichester, pp. 164 190.
19. Hendrikse, J. L., Parsons, T. E. Hallgrímsson, B. 2007. Evolvability as the proper focus of evolutionary developmental biology. Evol. Dev. 9 : 393 401.
20. Imre, I., McLaughlin, R. L. Noakes, D. L. G. 2001. Temporal persistence of resource polymorphism in Brook charr, Salvelinus fontinalis. Environ. Biol. Fishes 60 : 393 399.
21. Imre, I., McLaughlin, R. L. Noakes, D. L. G. 2002. Phenotypic plasticity in Brook charr: changes in caudal fin induced by water flow. J. Fish Biol. 61 : 1171 1181.
22. Ivanović, A., Kalezić, M. L. Aleksić, I. 2005. Morphological integration of cranium and postcranial skeleton during ontogeny of facultative paedomorphic European newts (Triturus vulgaris and T. alpestris). Amphibia-Reptilia 26 : 485 495.
23. Klingenberg, C. P. McIntyre, G. S. 1998. Geometric morphometrics of developmental instability: analyzing patterns of fluctuating asymmetry with procrustes methods. Evolution 52 : 1363 1375.
24. Koumans, J. T. M. Akster, H. A. 1995. Myogenic cells in development and growth of fish. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 110 : 3 20.
25. Kováč, V. 2002. Synchrony and heterochrony in ontogeny (of fish). J. Theor. Biol. 217 : 499 507.
26. Marroig, G. Cheverud, J. M. 2001. A comparison of phenotypic variation and covariation patterns and the role of phylogeny, ecology, and ontogeny during cranial evolution of the new world monkeys. Evolution 55 : 2576 2600.
27. Moss, M. L. 1997a. The functional matrix hypothesis revisited. 1. The role of mechanotransduction. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 112 : 8 11.
28. Moss, M. L. 1997b. The functional matrix hypothesis revisited. 2. The role of an osseous connected cellular network. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 112 : 221 226.
29. Moss, M. L. 1997c. The functional matrix hypothesis revisited. 3. The genomic thesis. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 112 : 338 342.
30. Moss, M. L. 1997d. The functional matrix hypothesis revisited. 4. The epigenetic antithesis and the resolving synthesis. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 112 : 410 417.
31. Olson, E. C. Miller, R. L. 1958. Morphological Integration. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 376 pp
32. Pakkasmaa, S. Piironen, J. 2001. Water velocity shapes juvenile salmonids. Evol. Ecol. 14 : 721 730.
33. Parsons, K. J. Robinson, B. W. 2006. Replicated evolution of integrated plastic responses during early adaptive divergence. Evolution 60 : 801 813.
34. Peres-Neto, P. R. Magnan, P. 2004. The influence of swimming demand on phenotypic plasticity and morphological integration: a comparison of two polymorphic charr species. Oecologia 140 : 36 45.
35. Proulx, R. Magnan, P. 2004. Contribution of phenotypic plasticity and heredity to the trophic polymorphism of lacustrine brook charr (Salvelinus fontinalis M.). Evol. Ecol. Res. 6 : 503 522.
36. Quinn, G. P. Keough, M. J. 2002. Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 520pp.
37. R Development Core Team. 2005. R A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria.
38. Riska, B. 1986. Some models for development, growth, and morphometric correlation. Evolution 40 : 1303 1311.
39. Robinson, B. W. Wilson, D. S. 1994. Character release and displacement in fishes: a neglected literature. Am. Nat. 144 : 596 627.
40. Rohlf, F. J. 2000. Statistical power comparisons among alternative morphometric methods. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 111 : 463 478.
41. Rohlf, F. J. Slice, D. 1990. Extensions of the procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Syst. Zool. 39 : 40 59.
42. Schlichting, C. D. Pigliucci, M. 1998. Phenotypic Evolution: A Reaction Norm Perspective. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, 387pp.
43. van Snik, G. M. J., van den Boogaart, J. G. M. Osse, J. W. M. 1997. Larval growth patterns in Cyprinus carpio and Clarias gariepinus with attention to finfold. J. Fish Biol. 50 : 1339 1352.
44. Venne, H. Magnan, P. 1995. The impact of intra- and interspecific interactions on young-of-the-year brook charr, in temperate lakes. J. Fish Biol. 46 : 669 686.
45. Wagner, G. P. 1984. On the eigenvalue distribution of genetic and phenotypic dispersion matrices - evidence for a non-random organization of quantitative character variation. J. Math. Biol. 21 : 77 95.
46. Willmore, K. E., Leamy, L. Hallgrímsson, B. 2006. Effects of developmental and functional interactions on mouse cranial variability through late ontogeny. Evol. Dev. 8 : 550 567.
47. Wund, M. A., Baker, J. A., Clancy, B., Golub, J. L. Foster, S. A. 2008. A test of the "flexible stem" model of evolution: ancestral plasticity, genetic accommodation, and morphological divergence in the threespine stickleback radiation. Am. Nat. 172 : 449 462.
48. Young, N. M. 2006. Function, ontogeny and canalization of shape variance in the primate scapula. J. Anat. 209 : 623 636.
49. Zelditch, M. L. 1987. Evaluating models of developmental integration in the laboratory rat using confirmatory factor analysis. Syst. Zool. 36 : 368 380.
50. Zelditch, M. L. 1988. Ontogenetic variation in patterns of phenotypic integration in the laboratory rat. Evolution 42 : 28 41.
51. Zelditch, M. L. Carmichael, A. C. 1989. Ontogenetic variation in patterns of developmental and functional integratrion in skulls of Sigmodon fulviventer. Evolution 43 : 814 824.
52. Zelditch, M. L., Lundrigan, B. L. Garland, T. 2004. Developmental regulation of skull morphology. I. Ontogenetic dynamics of variance. Evol. Dev. 6 : 194 206.
53. Zelditch, M. L., Mezey, J., Sheets, D. H., Lundrigan, B. L. Garland, T. 2006. Developmental regulation of skull morphology II: ontogenetic dynamics of covariance. Evol. Dev. 8 : 46 60.