Laparoscopic Peritoneal Entry Preferences Among Canadian Gynaecologists

Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada

Volumn 31, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 641-648

  Kroft, Jamie ^a   Aneja, Ambika ^a   Tyrwhitt, Jessica ^a   Ternamian, Artin ^a  

^a ST JOSEPH S HEALTH CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Canada; Gynaecologist; Injuries; Laparoscopic entry; Survey

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL INJURY; ARTICLE; BLOOD VESSEL INJURY; CANADIAN; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIST; HUMAN; INTESTINE INJURY; LAPAROSCOPY; LARGE VESSEL INJURY; MALE; MEDICAL PRACTICE; NEEDLE; OMENTUM INJURY; PATIENT SAFETY; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE; SMALL VESSEL INJURY; CANADA; GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY; METHODOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE; STATISTICS;

CANADA; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 70350506093     PISSN: 17012163     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34243-8     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Chapron C., Fauconnier A., Goffinet F., Breart G., Dubuisson J.B. Laparoscopic surgery is not inherently dangerous for patients presenting with benign gynecologic pathology: results of a meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 2002, 17:1334-1342.
2. Medeiros L.R., Fachel J.M.G., Garry R., Stein A.T., Furness S. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for benign ovarian tumours. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005, (3). Art. No. CD004751.pup2. 10.1002/14651858.
3. Härkki-Sirén P. The incidence of entry-related laparoscopic injuries in Finland. Gynaecological Endoscopy 1999, 8:335-338.
4. Champault G., Cazacu F., Taffinder N. Serious trocar accidents in laparoscopic surgery: a French survey of 103,852 operations. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1996, 6:367-370.
5. Deziel D.J., Millikan K.W., Economou S.G., Doulas A., Ko S.T., Airan M.C. Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a national survey of 4,292 hospitals and an analysis of 77,604 cases. Am J Surg 1993, 165:9-14.
6. Harkki-Siren P., Kurki T. A nationwide analysis of laparoscopic complications. Obstet Gynecol 1997, 89:108-112.
7. Jansen F.W., Kapiteyn K., Trimbos-Kemper T., Hermans J., Trimbos J.B. Complications of laparoscopy: a prospective multicentre observational study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997, 104:595-600.
8. Jansen F.W., Kolkman W., Bakkum E.A., de Kroon C.D., Trimbos-Kemper T.C.M., Trimbos J.B. Complications of laparoscopy: an inquiry about closed versus open-entry technique. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004, 190:634-638.
9. Yuzpe A.A. Pneumoperitoneum needle and trocar injuries in laparoscopy: a survey on possible contributing factors and prevention. J Reprod Med 1990, 35:485-490.
10. Lingam K., Cole R. Laparoscopy entry port visited: a survey of practices of consultant gynaecologists in Scotland. Gynaecol Endosc 2001, 10:335-342.
11. Hasson H.M. Open laparoscopy as a method of access in laparoscopic surgery. Gynaecol Endosc 1999, 8:353-362.
12. Bonjer H.J., Hazebroek E.J., Kazemier G., Giuffrida M.C., Meijer W.S., Lange J.F. Open versus closed establishment of pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 1997, 84:599-602.
13. Vilos G.A., Ternamian A., Dempster J., Laberge P.Y. Clinical Practice Gynaecology Committee, The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. Laparoscopic entry: a review of techniques, technologies, and complications. SOGC Clinical Practice Guideline No. 193, May 2007. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2007, 29(5):433-465.
14. Ternamian A. How to improve laparoscopic access safety. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2001, 10:31-39.
15. Phillips G., Garry R., Kumar C., Reich H. How much gas is required for initial insufflation at laparoscopy?. Gynecol Endosc 1999, 8:369-374.
16. Abu-Rafea B., Vilos G.A., Vilos A.G., Ahmad R., Hollett-Caines J. High pressure laparoscopic entry does not adversely affect cardiopulmonary function in healthy women. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2005, 12:475-479.
17. Shamiyeh A., Glaser K., Kratochwill H., Hormandinger K., Fellner F., Wayand W.U., et al. Lifting of the umbilicus for the installation of pneumoperitoneum with the Veress needle increases the distance to the retroperitoneal and intraperitoneal structures. Surg Endosc 2009, 23:313-317.
18. Roy G.M., Bazzurini L., Solima E., Luciano A.A. Safe technique for laparoscopic entry into the abdominal cavity. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2001, 8(4):519-528.
19. Hill D.J., Maher P.J. Direct cannula entry for laparoscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1996, 4(1):77-79.
20. Chandler J.G., Corson S.L., Way L.W. Three spectra of laparoscopic entry access injury. J Am Coll Surg 2001, 192:478-491.
21. Vilos G.A., Vilos A.G., Abu-Rafea B., Hollett-Caines J., Nikkhah-Abyaneh Z., Edris F. Three simple steps during closed laparoscopic entry may minimize major injuries. Surg Endosc 2009, 23:758-764.
22. Richardson R.F., Sutton C.J.G. Complications of first entry: a prospective laparoscopic audit. Gynaecol Endosc 1999, 8:327-334.
23. Corson S.L., Chandler J.G., Way L.W. Survey of laparoscopic entry injuries provoking litigation. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2001, 8:341-347.
24. Brosens I., Gordon A. Bowel injuries during gynaecological laparoscopy: a multinational survey. Gynaecol Endosc 2001, 10:141-145.
25. BishoffJ.T., Allaf M.E., Kirkels W., Moore R.G., Kavoussis L.R., Schroder F. Laparoscopic bowel injury: incidence and clinical presentation. J Urol 1999, 161:887-890.