Drosophila melanogaster males respond differently at the behavioural and genome-wide levels to drosophila melanogaster and drosophila simulans females

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 22, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 2183-2191

  Ellis, L L ^a   Carney, G E ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Behaviour; Conspecific and heterospecific courtship; Drosophila melanogaster; Drosophila simulans; Genome wide response

Indexed keywords

DROSOPHILA PROTEIN;

BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE; CONSPECIFIC; COURTSHIP; EVOLUTIONARY THEORY; FLY; GENE EXPRESSION; GENOME; MATE CHOICE; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; NERVOUS SYSTEM; SIGNAL; SYMPATRY;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DNA MICROARRAY; DROSOPHILA; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; FEMALE; GENETICS; GENOME; MALE; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ANIMALS; DROSOPHILA; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; DROSOPHILA PROTEINS; FEMALE; GENOME, INSECT; MALE; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; DROSOPHILA SIMULANS;

EID: 70350430675     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01834.x     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Ball, G.F. Balthazart, J. 2001. Ethological concepts revisited: immediate early gene induction in response to sexual stimuli in birds. Brain Behav. Evol. 57 : 252 270.
2. Ben-Shahar, Y., Robichon, A., Sokolowski, M.B. Robinson, G.E. 2002. Influence of gene action across different time scales on behavior. Science 296 : 741 744.
3. Bradley, K.C., Boulware, M.B., Jiang, H., Doerge, R.W., Meisel, R.L. Mermelstein, P.G. 2005. Changes in gene expression within the nucleus accumbens and striatum following sexual experience. Genes Brain Behav. 4 : 31 44.
4. Burmeister, S.S., Jarvis, E.D. Fernald, R.D. 2005. Rapid behavioral and genomic responses to social opportunity. PLoS Biol. 3 : 1996 2004.
5. Carney, G.E. 2007. A rapid genome-wide response to Drosophila melanogaster social interactions. BMC Genomics 8 : 288.
6. Champagne, F.A. Curley, J.P. 2005. How social experiences influence the brain. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 15 : 704 709.
7. Cobb, M., Burnet, B., Blizard, R. Jallon, J.-M. 1989. Courtship in Drosophila sechellia: its structure, functional aspects, and relationship to those of other members of the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup. J. Insect Behav. 2 : 63 89.
8. Cowling, D.E. Burnet, B. 1981. Courtship songs and genetic control of their acoustic characteristics in sibling species of the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup. Anim. Behav. 29 : 924 935.
9. Das, A., Mohanty, S., Capy, P. David, J.R. 1995. Mating propensity of Indian Drosophila melanogaster populations with D. simulans: a nonadaptive latitudinal cline. Heredity 74 : 562 566.
10. Doi, M., Matsuda, M., Tomaru, M., Matsubayashi, H. Oguma, Y. 2001. A locus for female discrimination behavior causing sexual isolation in Drosophila. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98 : 6714 6719.
11. Dukas, R. 2004. Male fruit flies learn to avoid interspecific courtship. Behav. Ecol. 15 : 695 698.
12. Ewing, A.W. 1983. Functional aspects of Drosophila courtship. Biol. Rev. 58 : 275 292.
13. Ewing, A. Bennet-Clark, H.C. 1968. The courtship songs of Drosophila. Behaviour 31 : 288 301.
14. Gailey, D.A., Jakcson, F.R. Siegel, R.W. 1982. Male courtship in Drosophila: The conditioned response to immature males and its genetic control. Genetics 102 : 771 782.
15. Greenspan, R.J. Ferveur, J.-F. 2000. Courtship in Drosophila. Annu. Rev. Genet. 34 : 205 232.
16. Hughes, P. Dragunow, M. 1995. Induction of immediate-early genes and the control of neurotransmitter-regulated gene expression within the nervous system. Pharmacol. Rev. 47 : 133 178.
17. Jallon, J.-M. 1984. A few chemical words exchanged by Drosophila during courtship and mating. Behav. Genet. 14 : 441 478.
18. Jallon, J.-M. David, J.R. 1987. Variations in cuticular hydrocarbons among the eight species of the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup. Evolution 41 : 294 302.
19. Jarvis, E.D. Nottebohm, F. 1997. Motor-driven gene expression. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94 : 4097 4102.
20. Kamyshev, N.G., Iliadi, K.G. Bragina, J.V. 1999. Drosophila conditioned courtship: two way of testing memory. Learn. Mem. 6 : 1 20.
21. Kozorovitskiy, Y., Hughes, M., Lee, K. Gould, E. 2006. Fatherhood affects dendritic spines and vasopressin V1a receptors in the primate prefrontal cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 9 : 1094 1095.
22. Kyriacou, C.P. Hall, J. 1980. Circadian rhythm mutations in Drosophila melanogaster affect short-term fluctuations in the male's courtship song. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 77 : 6729 6733.
23. Li, J. Wong, L. 2001. Emerging patterns and gene expression data. Genome Inform. 12 : 3 13.
24. Mehren, J.E., Ejima, A. Griffith, L.C. 2004. Unconventional sex: fresh approaches to courtship learning. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 14 : 745 750.
25. Mello, C.V. 2004. Identification and analysis of vocal communication pathways in birds through inducible gene expression. An. Acad. Bras. Cienc. 76 : 243 246.
26. Mello, C.V. Clayton, D.F. 1994. Song-induced ZENK expression in auditory pathways of songbird brain and its relation to the song control system. J. Neurosci. 14 : 6652 6666.
27. Mello, C.V., Vicario, D.S. Clayton, D.F. 1992. Song presentation induced gene expression in the songbird forebrain. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89 : 6818 6822.
28. Mello, C.V., Velho, T.A.F. Pinaud, R. 2004. Song-induced gene expression: A window on song auditory processing and perception. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1016 : 263 281.
29. Moulin, B., Aubin, T. Jallon, J.-M. 2004. Why there is a one-way crossability between D. melanogaster and D. simulans? An ontogenic explanation. Genetica 120 : 285 292.
30. Pinaud, R. 2004. Experience-dependent immediate early gene expression in the adult central nervous system: evidence from enriched-environment studies. Int. J. Neurosci. 114 : 321 333.
31. Ritchie, M.G., Halsey, E.J. Gleason, J.M. 1999. Drosophila song as a species-specific mating signal and the behavioural importance of Kyriacou & Hall cycles in D. melanogaster song. Anim. Behav. 58 : 649 657.
32. Scott, D. 1986. Sexual mimicry regulates the attractiveness of mated Drosophila melanogaster females. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 83 : 8429 8433.
33. Siegel, R.W. Hall, J.C. 1979. Conditioned responses in courtship behavior of normal and mutant Drosophila. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 76 : 3430 3434.
34. Sinha, S., Ling, X., Whitfield, C.W., Zhai, C. Robinson, G.E. 2006. Genome scan for cis regulatory DNA motifs associated with social behavior in honey bees. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103 : 16352 16357.
35. Siwicki, K.K. Ladewski, L. 2003. Associative learning and memory in Drosophila: beyond olfactory conditioning. Behav. Processes 64 : 225 238.
36. Siwicki, K.K., Riccio, P., Ladewski, L., Marcillac, F., Dartevelle, L., Cross, S.A. Ferveur, J.F. 2005. The role of cuticular pheromones in courtship conditioning of Drosophila males. Learn. Mem. 12 : 636 645.
37. Storey, J.D. Tibshirani, R. 2003. Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100 : 9440 9445.
38. Talyn, B.C. Dowse, H.B. 2004. The role of courtship song in sexual selection and species recognition by female Drosophila melanogaster. Anim. Behav. 68 : 1165 1180.
39. Tauber, E. Eberl, D.F. 2003. Acoustic communication in Drosophila. Behav. Processes 64 : 197 210.
40. Tomaru, M., Doi, M., Higuchi, H. Oguma, Y. 2000. Courtship song recognition in the Drosophila melanogaster complex: heterospecific songs make females receptive in D. melanogaster, but not in D. sechellia. Evolution 54 : 1286 1294.
41. Tompkins, L. 1984. Genetic analysis of sex appeal in Drosophila. Behav. Genet. 14 : 411 440.
42. Vaias, L.J., Napolitano, L.M. Tompkins, L. 1993. Identification of stimuli that mediate experience dependent modification of homosexual courtship in Drosophila melanogaster. Behav. Genet. 23 : 91 97.
43. Yamada, H., Matsuda, M. Oguma, Y. 2002. Genetics of sexual isolation based on courtship song between two sympatric species: Drosophila ananassae and D. pallidosa. Genetica 116 : 225 237.