Task exposures in an office environment: A comparison of methods

Ergonomics

Volumn 52, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 1248-1258

  Van Eerd, Dwayne ^a,b   Hogg Johnson, Sheilah ^a,b   Mazumder, Anjali ^a,c   Cole, Donald ^a,b   Wells, Richard ^d   Moore, Anne ^e  

^a INSTITUTE FOR WORK AND HEALTH   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^e YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Computer workstations; Ergonomic tools and methods; Injury risks; Office ergonomics; Upper limb disorders

Indexed keywords

COMPARISON OF METHODS; DIRECT OBSERVATION; EXPOSURE MEASUREMENT; INJURY RISKS; MEAN AGES; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS; OFFICE ENVIRONMENTS; OFFICE ERGONOMICS; OFFICE WORKERS; PRIMARY OBJECTIVE; SELF REPORT METHODS; TASK-BASED; TASK-RELATED FACTORS; UPPER LIMB DISORDERS;

COMPUTER WORKSTATIONS; ERGONOMICS; OCCUPATIONAL RISKS; OFFICE BUILDINGS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT;

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS;

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA COLLECTION METHOD; FEMALE; HUMAN; JOB PERFORMANCE; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; OCCUPATIONAL HAZARD; OFFICE WORKER; QUESTIONNAIRE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SELF REPORT; VIDEORECORDING; WORK ENVIRONMENT;

ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL; ADULT; FEMALE; HUMAN ENGINEERING; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASES; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; ONTARIO; QUESTIONNAIRES; RISK ASSESSMENT; UPPER EXTREMITY; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 70350336110     PISSN: 00140139     EISSN: 13665847     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00140130903023683     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Balogh, I., et al., 2004. Self-assessed and directly measured occupational physical activities - influence of musculoskeletal complaints, age and gender. Applied Ergonomics, 35 (1), 49-56.
2. Barrero, L.H., et al., 2009. Work pattern causes bias in selfreported activity duration: A randomised study of mechanisms and implications for exposure assessment and epidemiology. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 66, 38-44.
3. Blangsted, A.K., Hansen, K., and Jensen, C., 2004. Validation of a commercial software package for quantification of computer use. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 34, 237-241.
4. Cole, D.C., Wells, R.P., and the Worksite Upper Extremity Research Group, 2002. Interventions for musculoskeletal disorders in computer-intense office work: A framework for evaluation. Work and Stress, 16 (2), 95-106.
5. Cole, D., et al., 2006. Reducing musculoskeletal burden through ergonomic program implementation in a large newspaper. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 80, 98-108.
6. David, G.C., 2005. Ergonomic methods for assessing exposure to risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Occupational Medicine (London), 55 (3), 190-199.
7. de Kracker, H., et al., 2008. The effect of a feedback signal in a computer mouse on hovering behaviour, productivity, comfort and usability in a field study. Ergonomics, 51 (2), 140-155.
8. Dempsey, P.G. and Mathiassen, S.E., 2006. On the evolution of task-based analysis of manual materials handling, and its applicability in contemporary ergonomics. Applied Ergonomics, 37, 33-43.
9. Dennerlein, J.T. and Johnson, P.W., 2006. Different computer tasks affect the exposure of the upper extremity to biomechanical risk factors. Ergonomics, 49 (1), 45-61.
10. Douwes, M., de Kracker, H., and Blatter, B.M., 2007. Validity of two methods to assess computer use: Self-report by questionnaire and computer use software. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 37, 425-431.
11. Faucett, J. and Rempel, D., 1996. Musculoskeletal symptoms related to video display terminal use: An analysis of objective and subjective exposure estimates. AAOHN Journal, 44 (1), 33-39.
12. Gerr, F., Marcus, M., and Ortiz, D.J., 1996. Methodological limitations in the study of video display terminal use and upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders. American Journal of Industrial Medicine 29 (6), 649-656.
13. Hagberg, M., 1992. Exposure variables in ergonomic epidemiology. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 21, 91-110.
14. Hagberg, M., et al., 2007. Incidence of self-reported reduced productivity owing to musculoskeletal symptoms: Associations with workplace and individual factors among computer users. Ergonomics, 50 (11), 1820-1834.
15. Hansson, G.-Å., et al., 2001. Questionnaire versus direct technical measurements in assessing postures and movements of the head, upper back, arms and hands. Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment and Health, 27 (1), 30-40.
16. Heinrich, J., Blatter, B.M., and Bongers, P.M., 2004. A comparison of methods for the assessment of postural load and duration of computer use. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 61, 1027-1031.
17. Homan, M.M. and Armstrong, T.J., 2003. Evaluation of three methodologies for assessing work activity during computer use. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal, 64, 48s-55s.
18. IJmker, S., et al., 2007. Should office workers spend fewer hours at their computer? A systematic review of the literature. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 64, 211-222.
19. IJmker, S., et al., 2008. Test-retest reliability and validity of self-reported duration of computer use at work. Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment and Health, 34 (2), 113-119.
20. Jensen, C., 2003. Development of neck and hand-wrist symptoms in relation to duration of computer use at work. Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment and Health, 29 (3), 197-205.
21. Lassen, C.F., et al., 2005. Risk factors for persistent elbow, forearm and hand pain among computer workers. Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment and Health, 31 (2), 122-131.
22. Loomis, D. and Kromhout, H., 2004. Exposure variability: Concepts and applications in occupational epidemiology. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 45 (1), 113-122.
23. Marcus, M., et al., 2002. A prospective study of computer users: I.I. Postural risk factors for musculoskeletal symptoms and disorders. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 41 (4), 236-249.
24. Mathiassen, S.E., et al., 2003. Efficient one-day sampling of mechanical job exposure data-a study based on upper trapezius activity in cleaners and office workers. AIHA Journal, 64 (2), 196-211.
25. Mathiassen, S.E., et al., 2005. Task-based estimation of mechanical job exposure in occupational groups. Scand Journal of Work Environment and Health, 31 (2), 138-151.
26. Mikkelsen, S., et al., 2007. Validity of questionnaire selfreports on computer, mouse and keyboard usage during a four-week period. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 64, 541-547.
27. National Research Council, 2001. Musculoskeletal disorders and the workplace. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
28. Polanyi, M.F.D., et al., 1997. Upper limb work-related musculoskeletal disorders among newspaper employees: Cross-sectional survey results. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 32, 620-628.
29. Punnett, L. and Bergqvist, U., 1997. Visual display unit work and upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders: A review of epidemiological findings. Solna, Sweden: National Institute for Working Life.
30. Spielholz, P., et al., 2001. Comparison of self-report, video observation and direct measurement methods for upper extremity and musculoskeletal disorder physical risk factors. Ergonomics, 44 (6), 588-613.
31. Stock, S.R., et al., 2005. Reproducibility and validity of worker's self-reports of physical work demands. Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment and Health, 31 (6), 409-437.
32. Unge, J., et al., 2005. Validity of self-assessed reports of occurrence and duration of occupational tasks. Ergonomics, 48, 12-24.
33. Village, J., Rempel, D., and Teschke, K., 2005. Musculoskeletal disorders of the upper extremity associated with computer work: A systematic review. Occupational Ergonomics, 5, 205-218.
34. Wegman, D.H., et al., 1992. Measuring exposure for the epidemiologic study of acute effects. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 21 (1), 77-89.
35. Wells, R., Van Eerd, D., and Hagg, G., 2004. Mechanical exposure concepts using force as the agent. Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment and Health, 30, 179-190.
36. Witschi, J.C., 1990. Short-term dietary recall and recording methods. In: W. Willet, ed. Nutritional epidemiology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 52-68.