Decision making on strategic environmental technology licensing:

International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 609-624

  Chang, Ming Chung ^a   Hu, Jing Li ^b   Tzeng, Gwo Hsiung ^a,b  

^a KAINAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL CHIAO TUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Fixed fee; Game theory; Innovation; Licensing; Royalty

Indexed keywords

EID: 70350333309     PISSN: 02196220     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S0219622009003545     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. U.S. Environmental Assessment Division, National environmental technology cooperation center (2004), Downloaded from the website: http://www.ead.anl.gov/ project/.
2. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Licensing opportunities (2004), Downloaded from the website: http://www.lanl.gov/partnerships/licensing.htm.
3. Dow, What we license? (2004) Downloaded from the website: http://www.lanl.gov/ partnerships/licensing.htm.
4. University Technologies International, Technologies available for licensing, (2004) Downloaded from the website: http://www.uti.ca/tal.htm.
5. N. Gallini, Deterrence through market sharing: A strategic incentive for licensing, Am. Econ. Rev. 74 (1984) 931-941.
6. J. Reinganum, Uncertain innovation and the persistence of monopoly, Am. Econ. Rev. 73 (1983) 741-748.
7. O. K. Gupta, M. Mallikarjun, N. Cho and J. Jaisingh, Strategic response of an incumbent firm in IT intensive industry: A few rEffections, Int. J. Inform. Technol. Decision Making 2 (2003) 373-380.
8. N. Gallini and R. Winter, Licensing in the theory of innovation, Rand J. Econ. 16 (1985) 237-252.
9. M. Katz and C. Shapiro, On the licensing of innovations, Rand J. Econ. 16 (1985) 504-520.
10. G. Grossman and C. Shapiro, Dynamic R&D competition, Econ. J. 97 (1987) 372-387.
11. M. I. Kamien, Patent licensing, in Handbook of Game Theory With Economic Applications, eds. R. J. Aumann and S. Hart, Vol.1, Chapter 11 (Elsevier Science Publishers, North Holland, 1992), pp. 331-354.
12. X. H. Wang, Fee versus royalty licensing in a Cournot duopoly model, Econ. Lett. 60 (1998) 55-62.
13. K. J. Arrow, Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention, in The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, ed. R. Nelson (Princeton University Press, 1962), pp. 609-625.
14. M. I. Kamien and Y. Tauman, Fee versus royalties and the private value of a patent, Q. J. Econ. 101 (1986) 471-491.
15. X. H. Wang, Fee versus royalty licensing in a differentiated Cournot duopoly, J. Econ. Bus. 54 (2002) 253-266.
16. S. H. Kwok and S. M. Lui, A license management model for peer-to-peer music sharing, Int. J. Inform. Technol. Decision Making 1 (2002) 541-558.
17. T. Xiao, G. Yu and Z. Sheng, Reputation, utility and technological innovation strategies, Int. J. Inform. Technol. Decision Making 3 (2004) 81-100.
18. P. Dasgupta, P. M. Melliar-Smith and L. E. Moser, Maximizing welfare through cooperative negotiation in a multi-agent internet ecomomy, Int. J. Inform. Technol. Decision Making 5 (2006) 331-351.
19. D. Ding and J. Chen, Supply chain coordination with contracts game between complementary suppliers, Int. J. Inform. Technol. Decision Making 6 (2007) 163-175.
20. H. Yu, C. G. Dang and S. Y. Wang, Game theoretical analysis of buy-it-now price auctions, Int. J. Inform. Technol. Decision Making 5 (2006) 557-581.
21. J. R. Chiou and J. L. Hu, Environmental research joint ventures under emission taxes, Environ. Resour. Econ. 20 (2001) 129-146.