Retention of the posterior cruciate ligament versus the posterior stabilized design in total knee arthroplasty: A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2009, Pages

  Van Den Boom, Lennard G H ^a   Brouwer, Reinoud W ^a   Van Den Akker Scheek, Inge ^a,b   Bulstra, Sjoerd K ^b   Van Raaij, Jos Jam A M ^a  

^a MARTINI HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE PROSTHESIS; OSTEOARTHRITIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RANGE OF MOTION; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; VALGUS DEFORMITY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; INSTRUMENTATION; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE LIGAMENT; METHODOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTHESIS; STANDARD;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; HUMANS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION;

EID: 70350324926     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712474     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-10-119     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. The effect of knee-prosthesis geometry on cruciate ligament mechanics during flexion. WD Lew JL Lewis, J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1982 64A 734
2. Surgery of the knee. JN Insall WN Scott, Churchill Livingstone, New York Second 1993
3. The dominance of cycling sliding in producing wear in total knee replacements. GW Blunn PS Walker A Joshi K Hardinge, Clin Orth Relat Res 1991 273 253
4. Retention of the posterior cruciate in total knee arthroplasty. TP Andriacchi JO Galante, J Arthroplasty 1988 suppl 3 13 10.1016/S0883-5403(88) 80003-2 3199135
5. Retention versus removal of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee replacement. WC Jacobs DJ Clement AB Wymenga, Act Orth 2005 76 6 757 768 10.1080/17453670510045345
6. The AGC total knee prosthesis at average 11 years. RH Emerson Jr LL Higgins WC Head, J Arthroplasty 2000 5 4 1418 423
7. Long-term followup of anatomic graduated components posterior cruciate-retaining total knee replacement. MA Ritter ME Berend JB Meding EM Keating PM Faris BM Crites, Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001 388 51 57 10.1097/00003086-200107000-00009 11451132
8. Ten to fourteen year survival and functional analysis of the AGC total knee replacement system. RL Worland GV Johnson J Alemparte DE Jessup J Keenan M Norambuena, Knee 2002 9 2 133 137 10.1016/S0968-0160(01)00146-6 11950577
9. Validity and Responsiveness of the Knee Society Clinical Rating System in Comparison with the SF-36 and WOMAC. EA Lingard JN Katz RJ Wright EA Wright CB Sledge, J Bone Joint Surg 2001 83A 12 1856 1864
10. Health related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. A qualitative and systematic review of the literature. O Ethgen O Bruyere F Richy C Dardennes JY Reginster, J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2004 86A 963 974
11. Satisfactory cross cultural equivalence of the Dutch WOMAC in patients with hip osteoarthritis waiting for arthroplasty. LD Roorda CA Jones M Waltz GJ Lankhorst LM Bouter JW van der Eijken WJ Willems IC Heyligers DC Voaklander KD Kelly ME Suarez-Almazor, Ann Rheum Dis 2004 63 1 36 42 10.1136/ard.2002.001784 14672889
12. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. JN Insall LD Dorr RD Scott WN Scott, Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989 248 13 14 2805470
13. Translation, validation, and norming of the Dutch language version of the SF-36 Health Survey in community and chronic disease populations. NK Aaronson M Muller PD Cohen ML Essink-Bot M Fekkes R Sanderman MA Sprangers A te Velde E Verrips, J Clin Epidemiol 1998 51 11 1055 1068 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00097-3 9817123