A study of fairness judgments in China, Switzerland and Canada: Do culture, being a student, and gender matter

Judgment and Decision Making

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 214-226

  Gao, Yue ^a  

^a NANKAI UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

China; Culture; Fairness; Gender

Indexed keywords

EID: 70350303135     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19302975     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Beldona, S. & Namasivayam, K. (2006). Gender and demand-based pricing differences in perceived (un)fairness and repatronage intentions. Journal of Hospitality & Leisure Marketing, 14, 89-107.
2. Bian, W. Q. & Keller, L. R. (1999). Patterns of fairness judgments in north America and the People's Republic of China". Journal of Consumer Psychology, 8, 301- 320.
3. Bian, W. Q. & Keller, L. R. (1999). Chinese and Americans agree on what is fair, but disagree on what is best in societal decisions affecting health and safety risks. Risk Analysis, 19, 439-452.
4. Bicchieri, C. (1999). Local fairness. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 59, 229-236.
5. Buchan, N. R., Croson, R. T. A. & Johnson, E. J., (2004). When do fair beliefs influence bargaining behaviour? Experimental bargaining in Japan and the United States. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 181-190.
6. Chen, K. & Tang, F. F. (2009). Cultural differences between Tibetans and ethnic Han Chinese in ultimatum bargaining experiments. European Journal of Political Economy, 25, 78-84.
7. Frey, B. S. & Pommerehne, W. W. (1993). On the fairness of pricing - an empirical survey among the general population. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 20, 295-307.
8. Gächter, S. & Fehr, E. (2001). Fairness in the labour market- a survey of experimental results. In F. Bolle & M. Lehmann-Waffenschmidt (Eds.), Surveys in experimental economics, bargaining, cooperation and election stock markets. Heidelberg and New York: Physica-Verlag.
9. Galea C. & Wright B. (1999). Sex, roles and justice: A study of gender as a predictor of fairness in decision making. Women in Management Review, 14, 89-98.
10. Gorman, R. & Kehr J. (1992). Fairness as a constraint on profit seeking: Comment. American Economic Review, 82, 355-358.
11. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills CA: Sage.
12. Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.
13. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills CA: Sage.
14. Hsee, C. K. &Weber, E. U. (1999). Cross-national differences in risk preference and lay predictions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12, 165-179.
15. Inglehart, R., (2000). Culture and democracy. In: Harrison, L. E., Huntington, S. P. (Eds.), Culture matters:How values shape human progress, pp. 80-97. New York: Basic Books.
16. Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L. & Thaler, R. H. (1986). Fairness as a constraint on profit seeking: Entitlements in the market. American Economic Review, 76, 728- 741.
17. Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L. & Thaler, R. H. (1986). Fairness and assumptions of economics. Journal of Business, 59, 285-300.
18. Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1979), Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica, 47, 313-327.
19. Oosterbeek, H., Sloof, R. & Van De Kuilen, G. (2004). Cultural differences in ultimatum game experiments: evidence from a meta-analysis. Experimental Economics, 7, 171-188.
20. Ottone, S. (2006). Fairness: a survey. P. O. L. I. S. department's Working Papers 57, Department of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS.
21. Shiller, R. J., Boycko, M. & Korobov, V. (1991). Popular attitudes toward free market: The Soviet Union and the United States compared. American Economic Review, 81, 385-400.
22. Sweeney, D. P., & Mcfarlin, D. B. (1998). Process and outcome: Gender differences in the assessment of justice. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 83-98.