What do patients want most from sexual health services?

International Journal of STD and AIDS

Volumn 20, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 719-722

  Hitchings, S ^a   Allotey, J ^b   Pittrof, R ^a  

^a Enfield Primary Care Trust   (United Kingdom)

^b QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Integrated sexual health; Service improvement

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONFIDENTIALITY; CONTRACEPTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CENTER; HEALTH SERVICE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SEXUAL HEALTH; SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASE; UNITED KINGDOM;

FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES; HUMANS; LONDON; MALE; PATIENT PREFERENCE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES;

EID: 70350234631     PISSN: 09564624     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/ijsa.2009.009133     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Choosing Health. http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/ Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH-4094559 (last accessed 1 March 2009)
2. Department of Health. The National Strategy for Sexual Health and HIV. London: HMSO, 2001
3. http://www.tht.org.uk/informationresources/publications/policybriefing papers/achieivin48hourtarget.pdf. Achieving the 48 hour access target. (last accessed 1 March 2009)
4. Department of Health. Evaluation of One-Stop Shop (Oss) Models of Sexual Health Provision. http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/ Publications/ PublicationsStatistics/DH-083200 (last accessed 1 March 2009), 2008
5. Hambly S, Luzzi G. Sexual health services - a patient preference survey. Int J STD AIDS 2006;17:372-374 (Pubitemid 43765396)
6. Patel H, Heng EL, Aleem A, et al. Delivering results to clients: a question of satisfying needs or desires? Int J STD AIDS 2006;17:109-111
7. Doyle JR, Green RH, Bottomley PA. Judging relative importance: direct rating and point allocation are not equivalent. Organ Behav Hum Decision Processes 1997;70:65-72
8. Bottomley PA, Doyle JR, Green RH. Testing the reliability of weight elicitation methods: direct rating versus point allocation. J Marketing Res 2000;37:508-513
9. Ryan M, Scott DA, Reeves C. Eliciting public preferences for healthcare: a systematic review of techniques. Health Technol Assessment 2001;5 (Executive Summary) (Pubitemid 32279861)
10. Cheraghi-Sohi S, Hole AR, Mead N, et al. What patients want from primary care consultations: a discrete choice experiment to identify patients' priorities. Ann Fam Med 2008;6:107-115