Robust design of sheet metal forming process based on adaptive importance sampling

Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization

Volumn 39, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 531-544

  Tang, Yucheng ^a   Chen, Jun ^a  

^a SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Adaptive importance sampling; Response surface; Robust design; Sheet metal forming; Support vector machine

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE IMPORTANCE SAMPLING; ADAPTIVE IMPORTANCE SAMPLING METHOD; CUP DRAWING; MANUFACTURING PROCESS; NOISE FACTOR; OPTIMIZATION METHOD; OPTIMIZATION MODELS; PART QUALITY; PROCESS PARAMETERS; PRODUCT QUALITY; RESPONSE SURFACE; RESPONSE SURFACE METHOD; ROBUST DESIGN; ROBUST DESIGNS; ROBUST OPTIMAL SOLUTIONS; STAMPING PART; STOCHASTIC BEHAVIOR;

CONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION; DRAWING (FORMING); IMAGE RETRIEVAL; MACHINE DESIGN; METALS; OPTIMIZATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; SHEET METAL; STAMPING; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

METAL FORMING;

EID: 70350227219     PISSN: 1615147X     EISSN: 16151488     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00158-008-0343-3     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Altair Engineering Inc (2006) Altair hypermesh user manual version 8.0. Altair Engineering Inc., Troy
2. MT Browne MT Hillery 2003 Optimizing the variables when deep-drawing C J Mater Process Technol 136 64 71 10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00934-2
3. X Du W Chen 2000 Du X, Chen W Towards a better understanding of modeling feasibility robustness in engineering design J Mech Des 122 385 394 10.1115/1.1290247
4. Hallquist J (1998) LS-DYNA theoretical manual. Livermore Software Technology Corporation, Livermore
5. T Jansson L Nilsson 2006 Optimizing sheet metal forming processes-using a design hierarchy and response surface methodology J Mater Process Technol 178 218 233 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.03.040 (Pubitemid 44163127)
6. Jin RC, Chen W, Simpson TW (2000) Comparative studies of metamodeling techniques under multiple modeling criteria. AIAA-2000-4801
7. V Karthik RJ Comstock DL Hershberger, et al. 2002 Variability of sheet formability and formability testing Int J Mat Proc Technol 121 350 362 10.1016/S0924-0136(01)01219-5 (Pubitemid 34201281)
8. Y Li ZS Cui XY Ruan, et al. 2005 Application of six sigma robust optimization in sheet metal forming AIP Conf Proc 778 819 824 10.1063/1.2011323 (Pubitemid 44534015)
9. KM Liew H Tan T Ray, et al. 2004 Optimal process design of sheet metal forming for minimum springback via an integrated neural network evolutionary algorithm Struct Multidisc Optim 26 284 294 10.1007/s00158-003-0347-y
10. G Liu Z Lin Y Bao 2002 Improving dimensional accuracy of a u-shaped part through an orthogonal design experiment Finite Elem Anal Des 39 107 118 01856338 10.1016/S0168-874X(02)00072-0 (Pubitemid 35282142)
11. LSTC (2006) LS-DYNA keyword user's manual version 970. Livermore Software Technology Corporation, Livermore
12. Maker BN (2000) On drawbeads in sheet metal forming. SAE 2000-01-1107
13. Myers RH, Montgomery DC (2002) Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments. Wiley, New York
14. A Parkinson C Sorensen N Pourhassan 1993 A general approach for robust optimal design Trans ASME 115 74 80 10.1115/1.2919328
15. B Piotr N Hakim R Alain, et al. 2005 Moving least squares response surface approximation: formulation and metal forming applications Comput Struct 83 1411 1428 10.1016/j.compstruc.2004.07.011 (Pubitemid 40574504)
16. B Thaweepat J Cao C Xia, et al. 2005 Probabilistic design in a sheet metal stamping process under failure analysis AIP Conf Proc 778 867 872 10.1063/1.2011331 (Pubitemid 44534023)
17. T Thiyagarajan RV Grandhi 2005 3D preform shape optimization in forging using reduced basis techniques J Mater Process Technol 37 797 811 2178346
18. Vapnik VN (1995) The nature of statistical learning theory. Springer, Berlin
19. W Zhang ZQ Sheng R Shivpuri 2005 Material behavior based hybrid process for sheet draw-forging thin walled magnesium alloys AIP Conf Proc 778 613 618 10.1063/1.2011290 (Pubitemid 44533983)