Development of CSCW interfaces from a user-centered viewpoint: Extending the touche process model through defeasible argumentation

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 5619 LNCS, Issue , 2009, Pages 955-964

  González, María Paula ^a,b,d   Penichet, Victor M R ^c   Simari, Guillermo R ^b   Tesoriero, Ricardo ^c  

^a National Council of Scientific and Technical Research ^*  (Argentina)

^b UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DEL SUR   (Argentina)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CASTILLA LA MANCHA   (Spain)

^d UNIVERSITY OF LLEIDA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACT INTERACTION OBJECTS; ARGUMENTATION SYSTEMS; CLASS DIAGRAMS; COLLABORATION DIAGRAM; CSCW SYSTEMS; DEFEASIBLE ARGUMENTATION; DEVELOPMENT PROCESS MODELS; FORMAL MODEL; GROUPWARE APPLICATIONS; HUMAN ENVIRONMENT; HUMAN-COMPUTER; INCONSISTENT INFORMATION; ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURES; PROCESS MODEL; PROOF OF CONCEPT; RULE-BASED APPROACH; USER-CENTERED;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; GRAPHIC METHODS; GROUPWARE; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; PROCESS MONITORING; USER INTERFACES;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 70350219264     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-02806-9_109     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Penichet, V., Lozano, M., Gallud, J., Tesoriero, R.: Requirement Gathering Templates for Groupware Applications. In: Macías, J.A., Granollers, T., Latorre, P.M. (eds.) New Trends on HCI. Research, Development, New Tools and Methods. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
2. Penichet, V., Lozano, M., Gallud, J., Tesoriero, R.: User Interface Analysis for Groupware Applications in the TOUCHE Process Model. International Journal Advances in Engineering Software (ADES) (in press, 2009) ISSN: 0965-9978, doi: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2009.01.026
3. Burge, J., Brown, D.C.: Reasoning with design rationale. In: AI in Design 2000, pp. 611-629. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2000)
4. Jureta, J., Faulkner, S., Schobbens, P.: Clear justification of modelling decisions for goal-oriented requirements engineering. Requirements Eng. 13, 87-115 (2008)
5. Jureta, I.J., Faulkner, S.: Tracing the Rationale Behind UML Model Change Through Argumentation. In: Parent, C., Schewe, K.-D., Storey, V.C., Thalheim, B. (eds.) ER 2007. LNCS, vol. 4801, pp. 454-469. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
6. González, M.P., Chesñevar, C., Collazos, C., Simari, R.: Modelling Shared Knowledge and Shared Knowledge Awareness in CSCL Scenarios through Automated Argumentation Systems. In: Haake, J.M., Ochoa, S.F., Cechich, A. (eds.) CRIWG 2007. LNCS, vol. 4715, pp. 207-222. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
7. Kirschner, P., Buckingham, S., Carr, C. (eds.): Visualizing Argumentation: Software Tools for Collaborative and Educational Sense-Making. Springer, London (2003)
8. Gervasi, V., Zowghi, D.: Reasoning about inconsistencies in natural language requirements. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 14(3), 277-330 (2005)
9. Durán, A.: Applying Requirements Engineering. Catedral Publicaciones, Spain (2003) ISBN: 84-96086-06-2
10. Paternò, F.: Model-based Design and Evaluation of Interactive Applications. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)
11. Limbourg, Q., et al.: USIXML: A Language Supporting Multi-path Development of User Interfaces. In: Bastide, R., Palanque, P., Roth, J. (eds.) DSV-IS 2004 and EHCI 2004. LNCS, vol. 3425, pp. 200-220. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
12. Rahwan, I., Parsons, S., Reed, C. (eds.): Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4946. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
13. Chesflevar, C.I., Maguitman, A., Loui, R.: Logical Models of Argument. ACM Computing Surveys 32(4), 337-383 (2000)
14. Chesñevar, C., Maguitman, A., Simari, G.: Argument-Based Critics and Recommenders: A Qualitative Perspective on User Support Systems. Data & Knowledge Engineering 59(2), 293-319 (2006)
15. Brena, R., Aguirre, J., Chesñevar, C., Ramirez, E., Garrido, L.: Knowledge and Information Distribution Leveraged by Intelligent Agents. In: Knowledge and Information Systems (KAIS), vol. 12(2), pp. 203-227. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
16. García, A., Simari, G.: Defeasible Logic Programming: An Argumentative Approach. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming 4(1), 95-138 (2004)
17. Reed, C., Rowe, G.: Araucaria: Software for Argument Analysis, Diagramming and Representation. Int. J. on Artificial Intelligence Tools 13(4), 961-979 (2004)
18. Liu, X., Zhang, X., Soh, L.-K., Al-Jaroodi, J., Jiang, H.: A Distributed, Multiagent Infrastructure for Real-Time, Virtual Classrooms. In: Proc. ICCE 2003, pp. 640-647 (2003)
19. Soller, A., Guizzardi, R., Molani, A., Perini, A.: SCALE: supporting community awareness, learning, and evolvement in an organizational learning environment. In: Proc. of the 6th international conference on Learning sciences, pp. 489-496 (2004)