Knowledge and information distribution leveraged by intelligent agents

Knowledge and Information Systems

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 203-227

  Brena, Ramón F ^a   Aguirre, José L ^a   Chesñevar, Carlos I ^b   Ramírez, Eduardo H ^a   Garrido, Leonardo ^a  

^a SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING AND SCIENCES   (Mexico)

^b UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DEL SUR   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Defeasible argumentation; Knowledge management; Multiagent systems

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMATION SERVICES; INTELLIGENT AGENTS; MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS; SERVICE ORIENTED ARCHITECTURE (SOA);

DEFEASIBLE ARGUMENTATION; DISTRIBUTION POLICIES; INFORMATION DISTRIBUTIONS; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TOOLS; LEADING INDUSTRY; MODEL KNOWLEDGE; SYNTHETIC AGENTS; WEB-BASED SYSTEM;

KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT;

EID: 34547133464     PISSN: 02191377     EISSN: 02193116     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10115-006-0064-0     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Aguirre J, Brena R, Cantu FJ (2001) Multiagent-based knowledge networks. Expert Syst Appl 20(1):65-75
2. Arsanjani A (2001) A domain-language approach to designing dynamic enterprise component-based architectures to support business services. In: 39th international conference and exhibition on technology of object-oriented languages and systems, August 2001. TOOLS 39, pp 130-141
3. Atkinson R, Court R, Ward J (1998) The knowledge economy: Knowledge producers and knowledge users. The new economic index http://www.webcitation.org/5Lok8rHAK
4. Bellifemine F et al (1999) JADE - A FIPA-compliant agent framework. In: Proceedings of PAAM99, London, pp 97-108
5. Berners-Lee T, Hendler J, Lassila O (2001) The semantic web. Sci Am 284(5):28-37
6. Borges B, Holley K, Arsanjani A. (2004) Service-oriented architecture. http://www.webcitation.org/5LoIY9AGX
7. Bradshaw JM (ed) (1997) Software agents. AAAI MIT Press, Menlo Park, CA
8. Brena R, Aguirre J (2004) Push technologies leveraged by intelligent agents. In: The 8th world multi-conference on systemics, cybernetics and informatics proceedings, Orlando, Florida, USA, pp 236-238
9. Brena R, Aguirre JL, Treviño AC (2001a) Just-in-time information and knowledge: Agent technology for KM bussiness process. In: Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE conference on systems, man and cybernetics, IEEE press, Tucson, Arizona, USA, pp 3303-3308
10. Brena R, Aguirre JL, Treviño AC (2001b) Just-in-time knowledge flow for distributed organizations using agents technology'. In: Proceedings of the knowledge technologies 2001 conference, Austin, TX
11. Brena R, Ceballos H (2004a) Combining global and local ontology handling in a multiagent system. In: Barr V, Markov Z (eds) Proceedings of the seventeenth international Florida artificial intelligence research symposium conference, AAAI press, Miami Beach, Florida, USA, pp 418-424
12. Brena R, Ceballos H (2004b) A hybrid local-global approach for handling ontologies in a multiagent system. In: Yager RR, Sgurev VS (eds) Proceedings of the 2004 informations systems international conference, Varna, Bulgaria, IEEE, pp 261-266
13. Carrillo J (1998) Managing knowledge-based value systems. J Knowl Manage 1(4):280-286
14. Ceballos H, Brena R (2004a) Finding compromises between local and global ontology querying in multiagent systems. In: Meersman R, Tari Z (eds) On the move to meaningful Internet systems 2004: CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE: OTM confederated international conferences proceedings, LNCS, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, vol 3291, pp 999-1011
15. Ceballos H, Brena R (2004b) Web-enabling multiagent systems. In: Advances in artificial intelligence IBERAMIA 2004: 9th Ibero-American conference on AI, LNCS, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, vol 3315, pp 53-61
16. Ceballos H, Brena R (2005) Combining local and global access to ontologies in a multiagent system. J Adv Comput Intell Intell Inf 9(1):5-12
17. Chesñevar C, Maguitman A, Loui R (2000) Logical models of argument. ACM Comput Surv 32(4):337-383
18. Chin P (2003) Push technology: Still relevant after all these years? Intranet J, http://www.webcitation.org.5LvGUSopy
19. Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents (2002) FIPA abstract architecture specification, http://www.fipa.org/specs/fipa00001/ SC00001L.html
20. Friedman-Hill E (2005) Jess, the rule engine for the Java platform. http://www.webcitation.org/5LvH1dQaJ
21. García A, Simari G (2004) Defeasible logic programming: An argumentative approach. Theory Pract Logic Program 4(1):95-138
22. Himelstein RSL (1999) PointCast: The rise and fall of an internet star. Bus Week Online, http://www.webcitation.org/5LvHCUwsi
23. Horibe F (1999) Managing knowledge workers. Wiley, New York
24. Horrocks I (2002) DAML+OIL: A description logic for the semantic Web. Bull IEEE Comput Soc Tech Comman Data Eng 25(1):4-9
25. Hunter A (2001) Hybrid argumentation systems for structured news reports. Knowl Eng Rev (16):295-329
26. Interface21 Limited (2005) The Spring Java/J2EE application framework, http://www.springframework.org/
27. Johnson R (2003) Introducind the spring framework. TheServerSide.COM
28. Johnson R (2002) Expert one-on-one J2EE design and development. Wrox, Birmingham, UK
29. Johnson R (2005) J2EE development frameworks. Computer 38(1):107-110
30. Karacapilidis N, Gordon T (1996) Dialectical planning: Designing a mediating system for group decision making. Proceedings of the 10th Workshop Planen und Konfigurieren, pp 205-216
31. Labrou Y, Finin T, Peng Y (1999) Agent communication languages: The current landscape. IEEE Intell Syst 14(2):45-52
32. Liebowitz J, Beckman T (1998) Knowledge organizations. CRC Press, St. Lucie
33. Liebowitz J, Wilcox L (1997) Knowledge management. CRC, Boca Raton, FL
34. Lowrance JD, Harrison IW, Rodriguez AC (2000) Structured argumentation for analysis. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on systems research, informatics, and cybernetics, Baden-Baden, Germany, pp 47-57
35. Luo Z, Sheth A, Miller J, Kochut K (1998) Defeasible workflow, its computation and exception handling. In: Proceedings of the CSCW-98 workshop: Towards adaptive workflow systems, Seattle, WA, http://www.webcitation.org/5LvIsPVZV
36. Negroponte N (1996) Being digital. Random House, New York
37. Parsons S, Jennings NR (1998) Argumentation and multi-agent decision making. In: Proceedings of the AAAI spring symposium on interactive and mixed-initiative decision making, Stanford, CA, pp 89-91
38. Parsons S, Sierrra C, Jennings N (1998) Agents that reason and negotiate by arguing. J Logic Comput 8:261-292
39. Rahwan I, Ramchurn SD, Jennings NR, Mcburney P, Parsons S, Sonenberg L (2003) Argumentation-based negotiation. Knowl Eng Rev 18(4):343-375
40. Ramirez E, Brena R (2005) 'Integrating agent technologies into enterprise systems using web services'. In: ICEIS 2005, proceedings of the seventh international conference on enterprise information systems, Miami, USA, pp 11-15
41. Schuschel H, Weske M (2004) Automated planning in a service-oriented architecture. In: 13th international IEEE workshops on enabling technologies: Infrastructure for collaborative enterprises, WET ICE, pp 75-78
42. Simari G, Loui R (1992) A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation. Artif Intell 53:125-157
43. Stolzenburg F, García A, Chesñevar C, Simari G (2003) Computing generalized specificity. J Non-Class Logics 13(1):87-113
44. Sun Microsystems, Inc. (2003) JSR-000154 Java(TM) Servlet 2.4 Specification (Final release), http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/ final/jsr154/ index.html
45. The OpenSymphony Group (2005) Quartz enterpise job scheduler, http://www.opensymphony.com/quartz/
46. Whitestein Technologies, A.G. (2003) Web services agent integration project, http://wsai.sourceforge.net
47. Wooldridge M (1999) Multiagent systems: A modern approach to distributed artificial intelligence. MIT Press., Cambridge, MA
48. Wooldridge M (2001) An introduction to multiagent systems. Wiley, Bafins Lane, UK
49. Wooldridge M (1997) Agent-based software engineering. Softw Eng IEE Proc 144(1):26-37
50. World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) (2000) Extensible markup language (XML) 1.0, 2nd Edn, http://www.webcitation.org/5LvJRvkNn
51. World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) (2001) web services description language (WSDL) 1.1, http://www.w3c.org/TR/wsdl
52. World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) (2003a) Simple object access protocol, http://www.w3.org/TR/SOAP
53. World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) (2003b) Web services glossary, working draft, http://www.w3c.org/TR/ws-gloss/
54. Yang SJH, Lan BCW, Chung J-Y (2005) A new approach for context aware SOA. In: The 2005 IEEE international conference on e-Technology, e-Commerce and e-Service, EEE/05, Hong Kong, China, pp 438-443