ECAF: A new tool for the conversational analysis of electronic communication

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 40, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 1014-1027

  Duncan Howell, Jennifer ^a  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASYNCHRONICITY; AUTHENTIC CONTEXTS; CONVERSATIONAL ANALYSIS; ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS; ELECTRONIC DISCUSSIONS; ELECTRONIC MESSAGE; METHODOLOGICAL TOOLS; NEW TOOLS; NON-LINEAR; ONLINE ENVIRONMENTS;

COMMUNICATION;

EID: 70350166121     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00904.x     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Babbie, E. (1990). Survey research methods. Belmont, CA : Wadsworth Publishing Company.
2. Connelly, F. M. Clandinin, D. J. (1990). Stories of expertise and narrative inquiry. Educational Researcher, 19, 5, 2 14.
3. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T. Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2, 2-3, 87 105.
4. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T. Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 15, 1, 7 23.
5. Grabowski, B., Pusch, S. Pusch, W. (1990). Social and intellectual value of computer-mediated communications in a graduate community. Education and Technology Training International, 27, 3, 276 283.
6. Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C. A. Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17, 4, 397 431. (Pubitemid 127337039)
7. Hara, N., Bonk, C. J. Angeli, C. (2000). Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology. Instructional Science, 28, 2, 115 152.
8. Harasim, L. M. (1990). Online education: an environment for collaboration and intellectual amplification. In L. M. Harasim (Ed. Online education: perspectives on a new environment (pp. 39 66). New York, NY : Praeger.
9. Henri, F. (1992). Computer conferencing and content analysis. In A. R. Kaye (Ed. Collaborative learning through computer conferencing: the Najaden papers (pp. 117 136). Berlin : Springer-Verlag.
10. Hiltz, S. R. (1990). Evaluating the virtual classroom. In L. M. Harasim (Ed. Online education: perspectives on a new environment (pp. 133 184). New York, NY : Praeger.
11. Howell-Richardson, C. Mellar, H. (1996). A methodology for the analysis of patterns of participation within computer mediated communication courses. Instructional Science, 24, 47 69.
12. Kuehn, S. A. (1994). Computer-mediated communication in instructional settings: a research agenda. Communication Education, 43, 171 183.
13. Levin, J. A., Kim, H. Riel, M. (1990). Analyzing instructional interactions on electronic message networks. In L. M. Harasim (Ed. Online education: perspectives on a new environment (pp. 185 214). New York, NY : Praeger.
14. Levy, P. (2003). A methodological framework for practice-based research in networked learning. Instructional Science, 31, 87 109.
15. McCreary, E. K. (1990). Three behavioral models for computer-mediated communication. In L. M. Harasim (Ed. Online education: perspectives on a new environment (pp. 117 130). New York, NY : Praeger.
16. Newman, D. R., Webb, B. Cochrane, C. (1995). A content analysis method to measure critical thinking in face-to-face and computer supported group learning. Interpersonal Computing and Technology, 3, 2, 56 77.