Short porous implants in the posterior maxilla: A 3-year report of a prospective study

International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 23-29

  Corrente, Giuseppe ^a,b   Abundo, Roberto ^a,b   Des Ambrois, Alessandro Bermond ^b   Savio, Luca ^b   Perelli, Michele ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b NONE   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIO OSS; BIO-OSS; MINERAL;

ARTICLE; BONE PROSTHESIS; CLINICAL TRIAL; DENTAL SURGERY; EDENTULOUSNESS; FEMALE; HUMAN; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; MALE; MAXILLA; MAXILLARY SINUS; MOLAR TOOTH; ORAL SURGERY; POROSITY; PREMOLAR TOOTH; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

BICUSPID; BONE SUBSTITUTES; CROWNS; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; FEMALE; HUMANS; JAW, EDENTULOUS, PARTIALLY; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; MALE; MAXILLA; MAXILLARY SINUS; MINERALS; MOLAR; ORAL SURGICAL PROCEDURES, PREPROSTHETIC; POROSITY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 70350155266     PISSN: 01987569     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Boyne PJ, James RA. Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone. J Oral Surg 1980;38:613-616.
2. Tatum H Jr. Maxillary and sinus implant reconstructions. Dent Clin North Am 1986; 30:207-229.
3. Bahat O, Fontanessi RV. Efficacy of implant placement after bone grafting for three-dimensional reconstruction of the posterior jaw. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2001;21:220-231.
4. Summers RB. A new concept in maxillary implant surgery: The osteotome technique. Compendium 1994;15:152,154-156, 158 passim; quiz 162.
5. Summers RB. The osteotome technique: Part 3-Less invasive methods of elevating the sinus floor. Compendium 1994; 15:698,700,702-704.
6. Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, et al. Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-cnter study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:161-172.
7. Jemt T, Lekholm U. Implant treatment in edentulous maxillae: A 5-year follow-up report on patients with different degrees of jaw resorption. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:303-311.
8. Smiler DG, Jonhson PW, Lozada JL, et al. Sinus lift grafts and endosseous implants. Treatment of the atrophic posterior maxilla. Dent Clin North Am 1992;36:151-186.
9. Garg AK. Augmentation grafting of the maxillary sinus for placement of dental implants: Anatomy, physiology, and procedures. Implant Dent 1999;8:36-46.
10. Rosen PS, Summers RB, Mellado JR, et al. The bone-added osteotome sinus floor elevation technique: Multicenter retrospective report of consecutively treated patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:853-858.
11. Raghoebar GM, Timmenga NM, Reintsema H, Stegenga B, Vissink A. Maxillary bone grafting for insertion of endosseous implants: Results after 12-124 months. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001; 12:279-286.
12. Hürzeler MB, Kirsch A, Ackermann KL, Quiñones CR. Reconstruction of severely resorbed maxilla with dental implants in the augmented maxillary sinus: A 5-year clinical investigation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:466-475.
13. Bahat O. Brånemark system implants in the posterior maxilla: Clinical study of 660 implants followed for 5 to 12 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:646-653.
14. Regev E, Smith RA, Perrot DH, Pogrel MA. Maxillary sinus complications related to endosseous implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:451-461.
15. Schwartz-Arad D, Herzberg R, Dolev E. The prevalence of surgical complications of the sinus graft procedure and their impact on implant survival. J Periodontol 2004;75:511-516.
16. Coatoam GW, Krieger JT. A four-year study examining the results of indirect sinus augmentation procedures. J Oral Implantol 1997;23:117-127.
17. Zitzmann NU, Schärer P. Sinus elevation procedures in the resorbed posterior maxilla. Comparison of the crestal and lateral approaches. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998;85:8-17.
18. Deporter D, Todescan R, Caudry S. Simplifying management of the posterior maxilla using short, porous-surfaced dental implants and simultaneous indirect sinus elevation. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2000;20:476-485.
19. Renouard F, Nisand D. Impact of implant length and diameter on survival rates. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:35-51.
20. Deporter DA, Watson PA, Pilliar RM, Chipman ML, Valiquette N. A histological comparison in the dog of porous-coated vs. threaded dental implants. J Dent Res 1990;69:1138-1145.
21. Deporter DA, Todescan R, Watson PA, Pharoah M, Pilliar RM, Tomlinson GA. A prospective human clinical trial of Endopore dental implants in restoring the partially edentulous maxilla using fixed prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:527-536.
22. Deporter D, Watson P, Pharoah M, Todescan R, Tomlinson G. Ten-year results of prospective study using porous-surfaced dental implants and a mandibular overdenture. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2002;4:183-189.
23. Kaplan E, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 1958;53:457-481.
24. Pilliar RM. Overview of surface variability of metallic endosseous dental implants: Textured and porous surface-structured designs. Implant Dent 1998;7:305-314.
25. Cochran DL. A comparison of endosseous dental implant surfaces. J Periodontol 1999;70:1523-1539.
26. Pilliar RM, Simmons CA. Mechanical factors and osseointegration: Influence of implant design. In: Zarb GA (ed). Osteoporosis and Dental Implants. Chicago: Quintessence, 2001:35-44.
27. Oyonarte R, Pilliar RM, Deporter DA, Woodside DG. Peri-implant bone response to orthodontic loading: Part 2. Implant surface geometry and its effect on regional bone remodeling. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;128:182-189. (Pubitemid 41105396)
28. Pilliar RM, Sagals G, Meguid SA, Oyonarte R, Deporter DA. Threaded versus porous-surfaced implants as anchorage units for orthodontic treatment: Three-dimensional finite element analysis of peri-implant bone tissue stresses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:879-889.
29. Vaillancourt H, Pilliar RM, McCammond D. Factors affecting crestal bone loss with dental implants partially covered with a porous coating: A finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11: 351-359.
30. Hagi D, Deporter DA, Pilliar RM, Arenovich T. A targeted review of study outcomes with short (< or = 7 mm) endosseous dental implants placed in partially edentulous patients. J Periodontol 2004;75:798-804.
31. Emmerich D, Art W, Stappert C. Sinus floor elevation using osteotomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Periodontol 2005;76:1237-1251.
32. Davarpanah M, Martinez H, Tecucianu JF, Hage G, Lazzara R. The modified osteotome technique. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2001;21:599-607.
33. Peñarrocha M, Pérez H, Garciá A, Guarinos J. Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo as a complication of osteotome expansion of the maxillary alveolar ridge. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001;59:106-107.