Immediate postmastectomy reconstruction is associated with improved breast cancer-specific survival: Evidence and new challenges from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database

Cancer

Volumn 115, Issue 20, 2009, Pages 4648-4654

  Bezuhly, Michael ^a   Temple, Claire ^b   Sigurdson, Leif J ^c   Davis, Roger B ^d   Flowerdew, Gordon ^a   Cook Jr , E Francis ^e  

^a DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

^d BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Breast reconstruction; Survival

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST ENDOPROSTHESIS; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; CANCER CENTER; CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER SURVIVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA BASE; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MASTECTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMAPLASTY; MASTECTOMY; MIDDLE AGED; SEER PROGRAM;

EID: 70350120607     PISSN: 0008543X     EISSN: 10970142     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.24511     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Dean C, Chetty U, Forrest AP. Effects of immediate breast reconstruction on psychological morbidity after mastectomy. Lancet. 1983;1:459. (Pubitemid 13137383)
2. Rowland JH, Desmond KA, Meyerowitz BE, et al. Role of breast reconstructive surgery in physical and emotional outcomes among breast cancer survivors. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:1422-1429.
3. Franchelli S, Leone MS, Berrino P, et al. Psychological evaluation of patients undergoing breast reconstruction using 2 different methods: Autologous tissues versus prostheses. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;95:1213-1218.
4. Sandelin K, Wickman M, Billgren AM. Oncological outcome after immediate breast reconstruction for invasive breast cancer: a long-term study. Breast. 2004;13:210-218. (Pubitemid 38937125)
5. Medina-Franco H, Vasconez LO, Fix RJ, et al. Factors associated with local recurrence after skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction for invasive breast cancer. Ann Surg. 2002;235:814-819. (Pubitemid 34547299)
6. Vaughan A, Dietx JR, Aft R, et al. Patterns of local breast cancer recurrence after skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction. Am J Surg. 2007;194:438-443. (Pubitemid 47361047)
7. Gout S, Rouzier R, Missana MC, et al. Immediate reconstruction after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: effect on adjuvant treatment starting and survival. Ann Surg Oncol. 2005;12:161-166. (Pubitemid 40486625)
8. Downes KJ, Glatt BS, Kanchwala SK, et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction is an acceptable treatment option for patient with high-risk breast cancer. Cancer. 2005;103:906-913.
9. Spyrou GE, Titley OG, Cerqueiro J, et al. A survey of general surgeons' attitudes toward breast reconstruction. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1998;80:178-183.
10. Alderman AK, Hawley ST, Waljee J, et al. Correlates of referral practices of general surgeons to plastic surgeons for mastectomy reconstruction. Cancer. 2007;109:1715-1720. (Pubitemid 46668531)
11. Holmich LR, During M, Henriksen TF, et al. Delayed breast reconstruction with implants after invasive breast cancer does not impair prognosis. Ann Plast Surg. 2008;61:11-18.
12. Le GM, O'Malley CD, Glaser SL, et al. Breast implants following mastectomy in women with early-stage breast cancer: prevalence and impact on survival. Breast Cancer Res. 2005;7:R184-R193.
13. Shambaugh EM, Weiss MA, Axtell LM, et al. Summary staging guide for the cancer Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results reporting program. In: Fritz A, Ries L, eds. SEER Program Code Manual. 3rd ed. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute Available at: http://seer.cancer. gov/manuals/AppendC.pdf
14. SEER: Breast AJCC/UICC Stage. SEER Program: Comparative Staging Guide for Cancer, Major Cancer Sites, version 1.1; 2006 Available at: http://seer.cancer.gov/manuals/historic/comp-stage1.1.pdf
15. Li CI, Moe RE, Daling JR. Risk of mortality by histologic type of breast cancer among women aged 50 to 79 years. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:2149-2153. (Pubitemid 37248779)
16. Jatoi I, Chen BE, Anderson WF, et al. Breast cancer mortality trends in the United States according to estrogen receptor status and age at diagnosis. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25: 1683-1690. (Pubitemid 46797948)
17. Anderson WF, Jatoi I, Devesa SS. Distinct breast cancer incidence and prognostic patterns in the NCI's SEER program: Suggesting a possible link between etiology and outcome. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005;90:127-137. (Pubitemid 40568896)
18. Schafer JL. Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data. New York: Chapman and Hall, 1997.
19. Losken A, Carlson GW, Schoemann MB, et al. Factors that influence the completion of breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2004;52:258-261. (Pubitemid 38316295)
20. Spear SL, Mardini S, Ganz JC. Resource cost comparison of implant-based breast reconstruction versus TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112:101-105. (Pubitemid 36793375)
21. Hoshaw SJ, Klein PJ, Clark BD, et al. Breast implants and cancer: causation, delayed detection, and survival. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107:1393-1407.
22. Dayal HH, Power RN, Chiu C. Race and socio-economic status in survival from breast cancer. J Chronic Dis. 1982;35:675-683.
23. Gordon NH, Crowe JP, Brumberg DJ. Socioeconomic factors and race in breast cancer recurrence and survival. Am J Epidemiol. 1992;135:609-618.
24. Morrow M, Scott SK, Menck HR, et al. Factors influencing the use of breast reconstruction postmastectomy: A National Cancer Database Study. J Am Coll Surg, 2001;192:1-8. (Pubitemid 32065737)
25. Rowland JH, Dioso J, Holland MC, et al. Breast reconstruction after mastectomy: who seeks it, who refuses? Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;95:812-822.
26. Alderman AK, Hawley ST, Waljee J, et al. Understanding the impact of breast reconstruction on the surgical decision-making process for breast cancer. Cancer. 2008;112:489-494. (Pubitemid 351186189)