Delayed breast reconstruction with implants after invasive breast cancer does not impair prognosis

Annals of Plastic Surgery

Volumn 61, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 11-18

  Hölmich, Lisbet Rosenkrantz ^a,b   Düring, Maria ^c   Henriksen, Trine Foged ^a,b   Krag, Christen ^b   Tange, Ulla Brix ^c   Kjøller, Kim ^a   McLaughlin, Joseph K ^d,e   Olsen, Jørgen H ^f   Friis, Søren ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY   (Denmark)

^b GENTOFTE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^c International Center for Research and Research Training in Endocrine Disruption of Male Reproduction and Child Health   (Denmark)

^d INTERNATIONAL EPIDEMIOLOGY INSTITUTE   (United States)

^e VANDERBILT INGRAM CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^f Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center ^*

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Breast implant; Breast reconstruction; Disease free survival; Mortality; Radiation therapy; Survival

Indexed keywords

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT; HORMONE;

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST ENDOPROSTHESIS; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; CANCER INVASION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE FREE SURVIVAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HAZARD RATIO; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; LYMPH NODE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MASTECTOMY; MULTIMODALITY CANCER THERAPY; OVERALL SURVIVAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; SOCIOECONOMICS; TUMOR VOLUME; BREAST TUMOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENMARK; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; REGISTER; SURVIVAL; SURVIVAL RATE; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST IMPLANTS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DENMARK; DISEASE-FREE SURVIVAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMAPLASTY; MASTECTOMY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PROGNOSIS; REGISTRIES; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; SURVIVAL RATE;

EID: 48149089012     PISSN: 01487043     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31814fba15     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1227-1232.
2. Fisher B, Jeong JH, Anderson S, et al. Twenty-five-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing radical mastectomy, total mastectomy, and total mastectomy followed by irradiation. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:567-575.
3. van Dongen JA, Voogd AC, Fentiman IS, et al. Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:1143-1150.
4. Voogd AC, Nielsen M, Petersen JL, et al. Differences in risk factors for local and distant recurrence after breast-conserving therapy or mastectomy for stage I and II breast cancer: pooled results of two large European randomized trials. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:1688-1697.
5. Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1233-1241.
6. Al Ghazal SK, Fallowfield L, Blamey RW. Comparison of psychological aspects and patient satisfaction following breast conserving surgery, simple mastectomy and breast reconstruction. Eur J Cancer. 2000;36: 1938-1943.
7. Brandberg Y, Malm M, Blomqvist L. A prospective and randomized study, "SVEA," comparing effects of three methods for delayed breast reconstruction on quality of life, patient-defined problem areas of life, and cosmetic result. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105:66-74.
8. Handel N, Silverstein MJ, Waisman E, et al. Reasons why mastectomy patients do not have breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990; 86:1118-1122.
9. Spyrou GE, Titley OG, Cerqueiro J, et al. A survey of general surgeons' attitudes towards breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1998;80:178-183.
10. Georgiade GS, Riefkohl R, Cox E, et al. Long-term clinical outcome of immediate reconstruction after mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1985; 76:415-420.
11. Patel RT, Webster DJ, Mansel RE, et al. Is immediate postmastectomy reconstruction safe in the long-term? Eur J Surg Oncol. 1993;19:372-375.
12. Petit JY, Le M, Rietjens M, et al. Does long-term exposure to gel-filled silicone implants increase the risk of relapse after breast cancer? Tumori. 1998;84:525-528.
13. Vandeweyer E, Hertens D, Nogaret JM, et al. Immediate breast reconstruction with saline-filled implants: no interference with the oncologic outcome? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107:1409-1412.
14. Park AJ, Chetty U, Watson AC. Silicone breast implants and breast cancer. Breast. 1998;7:22-26.
15. Le GM, O'Malley CD, Glaser SL, et al. Breast implants following mastectomy in women with early-stage breast cancer: prevalence and impact on survival. Breast Cancer Res. 2005;7:R184-R193.
16. Andersen KW, Mouridsen HT. Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG). A description of the register of the nation-wide programme for primary breast cancer. Acta Oncol. 1988;27:627-647.
17. Friis S, Mellemkjaer L, McLaughlin JK, et al. Connective tissue disease and other rheumatic conditions following breast implants in Denmark. Ann Plast Surg. 1997;39:1-8.
18. Breiting VB, Hölmich LR, Brandt B, et al. Long-term health status of Danish women with silicone breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114:217-226.
19. Soerjomataram I, Louwman MW, Ribot JG, et al. An overview of prognostic factors for long-term survivors of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007 Mar 22 [Epub ahead of print].
20. Goldhirsch A, Glick JH, Gelber RD, et al. Meeting highlights: international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2005. Ann Oncol. 2005;16:1569-1583.
21. Overgaard M, Hansen PS, Overgaard J, et al. Postoperative radiotherapy in high-risk premenopausal women with breast cancer who receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group 82b Trial. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:949-955.
22. Murphy RX Jr, Wahhab S, Rovito PF, et al. Impact of immediate reconstruction on the local recurrence of breast cancer after mastectomy. Ann Plast Surg. 2003;50:333-338.
23. Deapen DM, Bernstein L, Brody GS. Are breast implants anticarcinogenic? A 14-year follow-up of the Los Angeles Study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;99:1346-1353.
24. Hoshaw SJ, Klein PJ, Clark BD, et al. Breast implants and cancer: causation, delayed detection, and survival. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001; 107:1393-1407.
25. Brinton LA, Lubin JH, Burich MC, et al. Breast cancer following augmentation mammoplasty (United States). Cancer Causes Control. 2000;11:819-827.
26. Su CW, Dreyfuss DA, Krizek TJ, et al. Silicone implants and the inhibition of cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;96:513-518.
27. Ramasastry SS, Weinstein LW, Zerbe A, et al. Regression of local and distant tumor growth by tissue expansion: an experimental study of mammary carcinoma 13,762 in rats. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;87:1-7.
28. Pivot X, Asmar L, Hortobagyi GN, et al. A retrospective study of first indicators of breast cancer recurrence. Oncology. 2000;58:185-190.
29. Perrone MA, Musolino A, Michiara M, et al. Early detection of recurrences in the follow-up of primary breast cancer in an asymptomatic or symptomatic phase. Tumori. 2004;90:276-279.
30. Haustein KO. Smoking and poverty. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2006;13:312-318.
31. Kunst AE, Bos V, Lahelma E, et al. Trends in socioeconomic inequalities in self-assessed health in 10 European countries. Int J Epidemiol. 2005;34:295-305.
32. Attree P. A critical analysis of UK public health policies in relation to diet and nutrition in low-income households. Matern Child Nutr. 2006; 2:67-78.
33. Quaade T, Engholm G, Johansen AM, et al. Mortality in relation to early retirement in Denmark: a population-based study. Scand J Public Health. 2002;30:216-222.
34. Dalton SO, During M, Ross L, et al. The relation between socioeco-nomic and demographic factors and tumour stage in women diagnosed with breast cancer in Denmark, 1983-1999. Br J Cancer. 2006;95:653-659.
35. Norredam M, Groenvold M, Petersen JH, et al. Effect of social class on tumour size at diagnosis and surgical treatment in Danish women with breast cancer. Soc Sci Med. 1998;47:1659-1663.
36. Baxter N, Goel V, Semple JL. Utilization and regional variation of breast reconstruction in Canada. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115:338-339.
37. Polednak AP. How frequent is postmastectomy breast reconstructive surgery? A study linking two statewide databases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108:73-77.
38. Alderman AK, McMahon L Jr, Wilkins EG. The national utilization of immediate and early delayed breast reconstruction and the effect of sociodemographic factors. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111:695-703.
39. Pomahac B, Recht A, May JW, et al. New trends in breast cancer management: is the era of immediate breast reconstruction changing? Ann Surg. 2006;244:282-288.
40. Ragaz J, Jackson SM, Le N, et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy in node-positive premenopausal women with breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:956-962.
41. Clarke M, Collins R, Darby S, et al. Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet. 2005;366:2087-2106.
42. Højris I, Overgaard M, Christensen JJ, et al. Morbidity and mortality of ischaemic heart disease in high-risk breast-cancer patients after adjuvant postmastectomy systemic treatment with or without radiotherapy: analysis of DBCG 82b and 82c randomised trials. Radiotherapy Committee of the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group. Lancet. 1999;354: 1425-1430.
43. Voordeckers M, Van de SJ, Vinh-Hung V, et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy after mastectomy for pT1-pT2 node negative (pN0) breast cancer: is it worth the effort? Radiother Oncol. 2003;68:227-231.