'Unwilling' versus 'unable': Capuchin monkeys' (Cebus apella) understanding of human intentional action

Developmental Science

Volumn 12, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 938-945

  Phillips, Webb ^a   Barnes, Jennifer L ^a   Mahajan, Neha ^a   Yamaguchi, Mariko ^b   Santos, Laurie R ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CEBIDAE; COMPREHENSION; CONCEPT FORMATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; VISION;

ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; CEBUS; COMPREHENSION; CONCEPT FORMATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTENTION; MALE; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 70350095577     PISSN: 1363755X     EISSN: 14677687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00840.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Behne, T., Carpenter, M., Call, J. Tomasello, M. (2005). Unwilling versus unable: infants' understanding of intentional action. Developmental Psychology, 41 (2 328-337.
2. Call, J., Hare, B., Carpenter, M. Tomasello, M. (2004). 'Unwilling' versus 'unable': chimpanzees' understanding of human intentional action. Developmental Science, 7 (4 488-498.
3. Corkum, V. Moore, C. (1998). The origins of joint visual attention in infants. Developmental Psychology, 34 (1 28 38.
4. Csibra, G., Biro, S., Koos, O. Gergely, G. (2003). One-year-old infants use teleological representations of actions productively. Cognitive Science, 27 (1 111-133.
5. Csibra, G., Gergely, G., Biro, S., Koos, O. Brockbank, M. (1999). Goal attribution without agency cues: the perception of 'pure reason' in infancy. Cognition, 72 (3 237-267.
6. Flombaum, J.I. Santos, L.R. (2005). Rhesus monkeys attribute perceptions to others. Current Biology, 15, 447-452.
7. Gergely, G. Csibra, G. (1997). Teleological reasoning in infancy: the infant's naive theory of rational action. A reply to Premack and Premack. Cognition, 63 (2 227-233.
8. Gergely, G., Nadasdy, Z., Csibra, G. Biro, S. (1995). Taking the intentional stance at 12 months of age. Cognition, 56 (2 165-193.
9. Hare, B., Addessi, E., Call, J., Tomasello, M. Visalberghi, E. (2003). Do capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) know what conspecifics do and do not see? Animal Behaviour, 65, 131-142.
10. Hare, B. Tomasello, M. (2004). Chimpanzees are more skillful in competitive than in cooperative cognitive tasks. Animal Behaviour, 68, 571-581.
11. Johnson, S.C., Booth, A. O'Hearn, K. (2001). Inferring the unseen goals of a non-human agent. Cognitive Development, 16 (1 637-656.
12. Johnson, S.C., Slaughter, V. Carey, S. (1998). Whose gaze will infants follow? The elicitation of gaze-following in 12-month-olds. Developmental Science, 1, 233-238.
13. Kuhlmeier, V., Wynn, K. Bloom, P. (2003). Attribution of dispositional states by 12-month-olds. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14 (5 402-408.
14. Meltzoff, A.M. (1995). Understanding the intentions of others: re-enactment of intended acts by 18-month-old children. Developmental Psychology, 31, 838-850.
15. Povinelli, D.J., Bering, J.M. Giambrone, S. (2000). Toward a science of other minds: escaping the argument by analogy. Cognitive Science, 24, 509-541.
16. Premack, D. Premack, A.J. (1997). Infants attribute value ± to the goal-directed actions of self-propelled objects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9 (6 848-859.
17. Santos, L.R., Nissen, A.G. Ferrugia, J. (2006). Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) know what others can and cannot hear. Animal Behaviour, 71 (5 1175 1181.
18. Saxe, R., Carey, S. Kanwisher, N. (2004). Understanding other minds: linking developmental psychology and functional neuroimaging. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 87 124.
19. Tomasello, M. Call, J. (1997). Primate cognition. New York : Oxford University Press.
20. Tomasello, M., Call, J. Hare, B. (2003). Chimpanzees understand psychological states - the question is which ones and to what extent. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 153-156.
21. Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T. Moll, H. (2005). Understanding and sharing intentions: the origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 675-691.
22. Tronick, E., Als, H., Adamson, L., Wise, S. Brazelton, T.B. (1978). The infant's response to entrapment between contradictory messages in face-to-face interaction. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 17 (1 1 13.
23. Woodward, A.L. (1998). Infants selectively encode the goal object of an actor's reach. Cognition, 69 (1 1 34.
24. Woodward, A.L., Sommerville, J.A. Guajardo, J.J. (2001). How infants make sense of intentional action. In B.F. Malle, L.J. Moses D.A. Baldwin (Eds Intentions and intentionality: Foundations of social cognition (pp. 149 169). Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.