Infants attribute value± to the goal-directed actions of self-propelled objects

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 9, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 848-856

  Premack, David ^a,b   Premack, Ann James ^a  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b PSL RESEARCH UNIVERSITY   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD BEHAVIOR; CHILD PSYCHOLOGY; COMPUTER MODEL; GAME; HABITUATION; HUMAN; INFANT; MOTION; MOTIVATION; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NORMAL HUMAN; OBJECT RELATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 0031468243     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/jocn.1997.9.6.848     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Baillargeon, R. (1995). Physical reasoning in infancy. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), Cognitive neuroscience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness. Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.
3. Bartsch, K. & Wellman, H. M. (in press). Children talk about the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Bennett, J. (1978). Some remarks about concepts. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1, 557-560.
5. Butterworth, G. (1990). The ontogeny and phylogeny of joint visual attention. In A. Whiten (Ed.), Natural theories of mind. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
6. Dasser, V., Ulbaek, I.,& Premack, D. (1989). The perception of intention. Science, 243, 365-367.
7. Dennett, D. C. (1978). Beliefs about beliefs. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1, 568-570.
8. Fernald, A. (1989). Intonation and communicative intent in mother speech to infants: Is the melody the message? Child Development, 60, 1497-1510.
9. Harman, G. (1978). Studying the chimpanzee's theory of mind. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1, 576-577.
10. Heider, E., & Simmel, M. (1944). An experimental study of apparent behavior. American Journal of Psychology, 57, 243-259.
11. Johansson, G. (1975). Visual motion perception. In R. Held & W. Richards (Eds.), Recent progress in perception. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
12. Leslie, A. M. (1987). Pretense and representation in infancy: the origins of "theory of mind." Psychotogical Review, 94, 412-426.
13. Leslie, A. M.,& Keeble, S. (1987). Do six-month-old infants perceive causality? Cognition, 25, 265-287.
14. Michotte, A. (1963). The perception of causality. Andover, MA: Methuen.
15. Poulin-Dubois, D., & Schultz, T. R. (1988). The development of the understanding of human behavior: From agency to intentionality. In J. W. Astington, P. L. Harris, & D. R. Olson (Eds.), Developing theories of mind. New York: Cambridge University Press.
16. Premack, D. (1990). The infant's theory of self-propelled objects. Cognition, 36, 1-16.
17. Premack, D., & Premack, A. J. (1994). Moral belief: Form vs content. In L. A. Hirschfeld & S. A. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture. New York: Cambridge University Press.
18. Premack, D., & Premack, A. J. (1995). Origins of social competence. In M. Gazzaniga (Ed.), Cognitive neuroscience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Premack, D., & Premack, A. J. (1997). Motor competence as integral to attribution of goal. Cognition, 63, 235-242.
20. Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? The Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 1, 516-526.
21. Samuels, A., & Ewy, H. (1985). Aesthetic preferences of faces during infancy. British Journal of Developmental Psychology. 3, 221-228.
22. Spelke, E. S. (1990). Principles of object perception. Cognitive Science. 14, 29-56.