A balanced approach to developing the enterprise architecture practice

Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing

Volumn 12 LNBIP, Issue , 2008, Pages 240-253

  Van Steenbergen, Marlies ^a   Van Den Berg, Martin ^a   Brinkkemper, Sjaak ^b  

^a Sogeti Netherlands   (Netherlands)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Architecture maturity Matrix; Enterprise architecture; Maturity models; Software process Improvement

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

5-LEVEL; ARCHITECTURE PRACTICE; DEVELOPMENT PATH; ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE; INDUSTRIAL CASE STUDY; MATURITY MODEL; MATURITY MODELS; SOFTWARE PROCESS IMPROVEMENT; WEAK POINTS;

SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE;

EID: 70350051043     PISSN: 18651348     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-88710-2_19     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Bucher, T., Fischer, R., Kurpjuweit, S., Winter, R.: Enterprise Architecture Analysis and Application - An Exploratory Study. In: EDOC workshop TEAR 2006, Hong Kong, Retrieved November 22, 2006, from tear2006.telin.nl. (2006)
2. Lankhorst, et al.: Enterprise Architecture at Work. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
3. CMMI: CMMISM for Systems Engineering, Software Engineering, Integrated Product and Process Development, and Supplier Sourcing (CMMI-SE/SW/IPPD/SS, V1.1) Staged Representation; CMU/SEI-2002-TR-012; ESC-TR-2002-2012 (2002)
4. Koomen, T., Pol, M.: Test Process Improvement, a practical step-by-step guide to structured testing. Addison-Wesley, Boston (1999)
5. GAO: A framework for assessing and improving enterprise architecture management (2003)
6. Appel, W.: Architecture Capability Assessment. In: Enterprise Planning & Architecture Strategies, vol.4(7). METAGroup (2000)
7. METAgroup: Diagnostic for Enterprise Architecture, META Practice (2001)
8. NASCIO: NASCIO enterprise architecture maturity model (2003)
9. Westbrock, T.: Architecture Process Maturity Revisited and Revised. METAgroup Delta 2902 (2004)
10. Hartman, A., Sifonis, J., Kador, J.: Net Ready: Strategies for Success in the E-conomy. McGraw-Hill, New York (2000)
11. Kaplan, R., Norton, D.: The balanced scorecard: measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review 70(1), 71-79 (1992)
12. Martinsons, M., Davison, R., Tse, D.: The balanced scorecard: a foundation for the strategic management of information systems. Decision Support Systems 25, 71-88 (1999)
13. Schelp, J., Stutz, M.: A balanced scorecard approach to measure the value of enterprise architecture. In: Tear workshop (June 2007)
14. Wagter, R., van den Berg, M., Luijpers, L., van Steenbergen, M.: Dynamic Enterprise Architecture: how to make it work. Wiley, Hoboken (2001)
15. van den Berg, M., van Steenbergen, M.: Building an enterprise architecture practice. Springer, Dordrecht (2006)
16. van den Berg, M., van Steenbergen, M.: Niveaus van werken onder architectuur (Levels of architectural maturity). Informatie 45(2), 52-56 (2003)