Genetic determinants of mate recognition in Brachionus manjavacas (Rotifera)

BMC Biology

Volumn 7, Issue , 2009, Pages 60-

  Snell, Terry W ^a   Shearer, Tonya L ^a   Smith, Hilary A ^a   Kubanek, Julia ^a   Gribble, Kristin E ^b   Welch, David B M ^b  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b MARINE BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASPARAGINASE; COMPLEMENTARY DNA; DOUBLE STRANDED RNA; PHEROMONE; PHOSPHATE; SODIUM CHLORIDE; GDPMANNOSE 4,6-DEHYDRATASE; GUANOSINE DIPHOSPHATE MANNOSE 4,6 DEHYDRATASE; HYDROLYASE; ISOPROTEIN; SEX PHEROMONE; SIGNAL PEPTIDE;

AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA LIBRARY; ENZYME GLYCOSYLATION; GENE FUNCTION; GENE IDENTIFICATION; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC MARKER; HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; MALE; MATE CHOICE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PROTEIN ISOLATION; PROTEIN MOTIF; PROTEIN PURIFICATION; RNA INTERFERENCE; ROTIFERA; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; CHEMISTRY; DNA SEQUENCE; FEMALE; GENE; GENE LIBRARY; GENE SILENCING; GENETIC TRANSFECTION; GENETICS; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; MOLECULAR GENETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT; UNTRANSLATED REGION;

ANIMALIA; BRACHIONIDAE; BRACHIONUS; BRACHIONUS PLICATILIS; HEXAPODA; ROTIFERA;

AMINO ACID MOTIFS; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; CONSERVED SEQUENCE; FEMALE; GENE KNOCKDOWN TECHNIQUES; GENE LIBRARY; GENES, HELMINTH; HYDRO-LYASES; MALE; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PROTEIN ISOFORMS; PROTEIN SORTING SIGNALS; RNA, DOUBLE-STRANDED; ROTIFERA; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SEX ATTRACTANTS; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; TRANSFECTION; UNTRANSLATED REGIONS;

EID: 70350018263     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17417007     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1741-7007-7-60     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Wyatt TD. Pheromones and Animal Behavior. 2003, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Heyland A, Hodin J, Reitzel AM. Hormone signaling in evolution and development: a non-model system approach. BioEssays 2004, 27:64-75.
3. Horth L. Sensory genes and mate choice: Evidence that duplications, mutations, and adaptive evolution alter variation in mating cue genes and their receptors. Genomics 2007, 90:159-175. 10.1016/j.ygeno.2007.03.021, 17544617.
4. Swanson WJ, Vacquier VD. The rapid evolution of reproductive proteins. Nat Genet 2002, 3:137-144.
5. Gilbert JJ. Contact chemoreception, mating behaviour, and sexual isolation in the rotifer genus Brachionus. J Exp Biol 1963, 40:625-641.
6. Gilbert JJ, Walsh EJ. Brachionus calyciflorus is a species complex: Mating behavior and genetic differentiation among four geographically isolated strains. Hydrobiologia 2005, 546:257-265.
7. Suatoni E, Vicario S, Rice S, Snell TW, Caccone A. Phylogenetic and biogeographic patterns in the salt water rotifer, Brachionus plicatilis. Mol Phylogenet Evol 2006, 41:86-98. 10.1016/j.ympev.2006.04.025, 16815046.
8. Snell TW, Kim J, Zelaya E, Resop R. Mate choice and sexual conflict in Brachionus plicatilis (Rotifera). Hydrobiologia 2007, 593:151-157.
9. Kubanek J, Snell TW. Quorum sensing in rotifers. Chemical Communication Among Microbes 2008, 453-461. Washington DC: ASM Press, Winans SC, Bassler BL.
10. Snell TW. Systematics, reproductive isolation and species boundaries in rotifers. Hydrobiologia 1989, 186/187:299-310.
11. Snell TW, Rico-Martinez R, Kelly LN, Battle TE. Identification of a sex pheromone from a rotifer. Mar Biol 1995, 123:347-353.
12. Snell TW, Nacionales MA. Sex pheromones and mate recognition in rotifers. Comp Biochem Physiol 1990, 97A:211-216.
13. Rico-Martinez R, Snell TW. Binding and blocking of mating in Brachionus plicatilis (Muller) and Brachionus rotundiformis (Tschugunoff) (Rotifera) females by an antibody against the mate recognition pheromone. Hydrobiologia 1997, 358:71-76.
14. Snell TW. Chemical ecology of rotifers. Hydrobiologia 387/388:267-276.
15. Fontaneto D, Giordani I, Melone G, Serra M. Disentangling the morphological stasis in two rotifer species of the Brachionus plicatilis species complex. Hydrobiologia 2007, 583:297-307.
16. Gómez A, Serra M, Carvalho GR, Lunt DH. Speciation in ancient cryptic species complexes: evidence from the molecular phylogeny of Brachionus plicatilis (Rotifera). Evolution 2002, 56:1431-1444.
17. Snell TW, Stelzer CP. Removal of surface glycoproteins and transfer among Brachionus species. Hydrobiologia 2005, 546:267-274.
18. Snell TW, Hawkinson CA. Behavioral reproductive isolation among populations of the rotifer Brachionus plicatilis. Evolution 1983, 37:1294-1305.
19. Gómez A, Serra M. Mate choice in male Brachionus plicatilis rotifers. Funct Ecol 1996, 10:681-687.
20. Aloia RC, Moretti RL. Mating behavior and ultrastructural aspects of copulation in the rotifer Asplanchna brightwelli. Trans Am Microsc Soc 1973, 92:371-380.
21. Schröder T. Precopulatory mate guarding and mating behaviour in the rotifer Epiphanes senta (Monogononta, Rotifera). Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2003, 270:1965-1970.
22. Snell TW, Kubanek JM, Carter WE, Payne AB, Kim J, Hicks M, Stelzer CP. A protein signal triggers sexual reproduction in Brachionus plicatilis (Rotifera). Mar Biol 2006, 149:763-773.
23. Derry AM, Hebert PDN, Prepas EE. Evolution of rotifers in saline and subsaline lakes: A molecular phylogenetic approach. Limnol Oceanogr 2003, 48:675-685.
24. Ewing B, Green P. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. II. Error probabilities. Genome Res 1998, 8:186-194.
25. Suga K, Mark Welch D, Tanaka Y, Sakakura Y, Hagiwara A. Analysis of expressed sequence tags of the cyclically parthenogenetic rotifer Brachionus plicatilis. PLoS One 2007, 2:e671. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000671., 10.1371/journal.pone.0000671, 1925144, 17668053.
26. Mark Welch DB, Mark Welch JL, Meselson M. Evidence for degenerate tetraploidy in bdelloid rotifers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008, 105:5145-5149. 10.1073/pnas.0800972105, 2278229, 18362354.
27. Rice P, Longden I, Bleasby A. EMBOSS: The European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite. Trends Genet 2000, 16:276-277. 10.1016/S0168-9525(00)02024-2, 10827456.
28. Rozas J, Sanchez-DelBarrio JC, Messeguer X, Rozas R. DnaSP, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods. Bioinformatics 2003, 19:2496-2497. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg359, 14668244.
29. Emanuelsson O, Brunak S, von Heijne G, Nielsen H. Locating proteins in the cell using TargetP, SignalP, and related tools. Nat Protoc 2007, 2:953-971. 10.1038/nprot.2007.131, 17446895.
30. Piano F, Schetter AJ, Morton DG, Gunsalus KC, Reinke V, Kim SK, Kemphues KJ. Gene clustering based on RNAi phenotypes of ovary-enriched genes in C. elegans. Curr Biol 2002, 12:1959-1964. 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)01301-5, 12445391.
31. Hall TA. BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 1999, 41:95-98.
32. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. Biometry. 1995, New York: W.H. Freeman.
33. Snell TW, Morris PD, Cecchine GA. Localization of the mate recognition pheromone in the marine rotifer Brachionus plicatilis. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 1993, 165:225-235.
34. Snell TW, Childress M, Winkler BC. Characterization of the mate recognition factor of the rotifer Brachionus plicatilis. Comp Biochem Physiol 1988, 89A:481-485.
35. Blows MW, Allan RA. Levels of mate recognition within and between two Drosophila species and their hybrids. Am Nat 1998, 152:826-837. 10.1086/286211, 18811430.
36. Ferveur JF. Cuticular hydrocarbons: Their evolution and roles in Drosophila pheromonal communication. Behav Genet 2005, 35:279-295. 10.1007/s10519-005-3220-5, 15864443.
37. Dickson BJ. Wired for sex: The neurobiology of Drosophila mating decisions. Science 2008, 322:904-909. 10.1126/science.1159276, 18988843.
38. Gleason JM, Jallon JM, Rouault JD, Ritchie MG. Quantitative trait loci for cuticular hydrocarbons associated with sexual isolation between Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia. Genetics 2005, 171:1789-1798. 10.1534/genetics.104.037937, 1456104, 16143629.
39. Dani FR, Jones GR, Destri S, Spencer SH, Turillazzi S. Deciphering the recognition signature within the cuticular chemical profile of paper wasps. Anim Behav 2001, 62:165-171.
40. Ginzel MD, Hanks LM. Contact pheromones as mate recognition cues of four species of longhorned beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). J Insect Behav 2003, 16:181-187.
41. Zhang A, Oliver JE, Chauhan K, Zhao B, Xia L, Xu Z. Evidence for contact sex recognition pheromone of the Asian longhorned beetle, Anoplophora glabripennis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Naturwissenschaften 2003, 90:410-413. 10.1007/s00114-003-0452-1, 14504784.
42. Singer TL. Roles of hydrocarbons in the recognition systems of insects. Am Zool 1998, 38:394-405.
43. Rouault JD, Marican C, Wicker-Thomas C, Jallon JM. Relations between cuticular hydrocarbon (HC) polymorphism, resistance against desiccation and breeding temperature; a model for HC evolution in D. melanogaster and D. simulans. Genetica 2004, 120:195-212. 10.1023/B:GENE.0000017641.75820.49, 15088658.
44. Alarie Y, Joly H, Dennie D. Cuticular hydrocarbon analysis of the aquatic beetle Agabus anthracinus Mannerheim (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae). Can Entomol 1998, 130:615-629.
45. Gahmberg CG, Tolvanen M. Why mammalian cell surface proteins are glycoproteins. Trends Biochem Sci 1996, 21:308-311.
46. Bertozzi CR, Kiessling LL. Chemical glycobiology. Science 2001, 291:2357-2364. 10.1126/science.1059820, 11269316.
47. Lonsdale DJ, Frey MA, Snell TW. The role of chemical signals in copepod reproduction. J Mar Syst 1998, 15:1-12.
48. Kelly LS, Snell TW. Chemical communication during mating of the copepod Tigriopus japonicus. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 1998, 353:737-744.
49. Ting JH, Snell TW. Purification and sequencing of a mate recognition protein from the copepod Tigriopus japonicus. Mar Biol 2003, 143:1-8.
50. Snell TW. Contact chemoreception and its role in zooplankton mate recognition. Chemical Communication in Crustaceans Springer, New York, Thiel M, Breithaupt T, .
51. East L, Isacke CM. The mannose receptor family. Biochim Biophys Acta 2002, 1572:364-386.