Increasing corporate social responsibility through an employee-centered approach

Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 279-290

  Nord, Walter R ^a   Fuller, Sally Riggs ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Corporate social responsibility; CSR; Employee centered; Grassroots; Organizational change

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349999396     PISSN: 08927545     EISSN: 15733378     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10672-009-9126-2     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Academy of Management Review. Briarcliff Manor (NY): Academy of Management, Pace University. Vol. 32, No. 3, July 2007.
2. Anderson, R. C. (1998). Mid-course correction: Toward a sustainable enterprise: The interface model. White River Junction: Chelsea Green.
3. Barnett, M. L. (2007). Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32, 794-816.
4. Bies, R. J. (2005). Are procedural justice and interactional justice conceptually distinct? In J. Greenberg & J. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 85-112). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
5. Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations (pp. 43-55). Greenwich: JAI.
6. Bies, R. J., Bartunek, J. M., Fort, T. L., & Zald, M. N. (2007). Corporations as social change agents: Individual, interpersonal, institutional, and environmental dynamics. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 788-793.
7. Brooks, M. (2008). It's the Little Things That Count. Unpublished manuscript, University of South Florida, Tampa.
8. Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1997). The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 1-34.
9. Chandler, A. (1962). Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the American industrial enterprise. Cambridge: The MIT.
10. Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(1), 1-25.
11. Greene, B. (2008). Politics and Control in Organizations: A Small Wins Approach to CSR. Unpublished manuscript, University of South Florida, Tampa.
12. Kleinrichert, D. (2007). Responsibility and Practice in Notions of Corporate Social Responsibility. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of South Florida, Tampa.
13. Meyerson, D. E. (2001a). Tempered radicals: How people use difference to inspire change at work. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
14. Meyerson, D. E. (2001b). Radical change, the quiet way. Harvard Business Review, 79(9), 92-100.
15. Meyerson, D. E., & Scully, M. A. (1995). Tempered radicalism and the politics of ambivalence and change. Organization Science, 6(5), 585-600.
16. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24, 403-441.
17. Spector, R., & McCarthy, P. D. (1995). The nordstrom way: The inside story of America's #1 customer service company. New York: Wiley.
18. Weick, K. E. (1984). Small wins: Redefining the scale of social problems. American Psychologist, 39(1), 40-49.
19. Weick, K. E. (1987). Substitutes for strategy. In D. J. Teece (Ed.), The competitive challenge (pp. 221-233). Cambrige: Ballinger.
20. Weick, K. E. (1999). Sensemaking as an organizational dimension of global change. In J. Dutton & D. Cooperrider (Eds.), Organizational dimensions of global change: No limits to cooperation (pp. 39-56). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
21. Weick, K. E. (2001). Making sense of the organization. Malden: Blackwell.
22. Weick, K. E., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2001). Managing the unexpected: Assuring high performance in an age of complexity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.