ShotgunFunctionalizeR: An R-package for functional comparison of metagenomes

Bioinformatics

Volumn 25, Issue 20, 2009, Pages 2737-2738

  Kristiansson, Erik ^a,b   Hugenholtz, Philip ^c   Dalevi, Daniel ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^c DOE JOINT GENOME INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; DATA ANALYSIS; DATA ANALYSIS SOFTWARE; GENE SEQUENCE; HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING; METAGENOMICS; METHODOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, GENETIC; GENOMICS; HUMANS; METAGENOME; METAGENOMICS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 70349993601     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp508     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Agresti,A. (2002) Categorical Data Analysis. Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics, Hoboken, USA.
2. Bairoch,A. (2000) The enzyme database in 2000. Nucleic Acids Res., 28, 304-305.
3. DeLong,E. et al. (2006) Community genomics among stratified microbial assemblages in the ocean's. Science, 311, 496-503.
4. Dudoit,S. and van der Laan,M. (2008) Multiple Testing Procedures with Applications to Genomics. Springer Series in Statistics, New York, USA.
5. Fleiss,J. et al. (2003) Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. Wiley, Hoboken, USA.
6. Hugenholtz,P. et al. (1998) Impact of culture-independent studies on the emerging phylogenetic view of bacterial diversity. J. Bacteriol., 180, 4765-4774.
7. Kanehisa,M. et al. (2002) The KEGG databases at GenomeNet. Nucleic Acids Res., 30, 42-46.
8. Kunin,V. et al. (2008) A bioinformatician's guide to metagenomics. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., 72, 557-578.
9. Markowitz,V. et al. (2008) IMG/M: A data management and analysis system for metagenomes. Nucleic Acids Res., 36, D534-D538.
10. Meyer,F. et al. (2009) Themetagenomics rast server - a public resource for the automatic phylogenetic and functional analysis of metagenomes. BMC Bioinformatics, 9, 386.
11. Mitra,S. et al. (2009) Visual and statistical comparison of metagenomes. Bioinformatics. [Epub ahead of print; doi:10.1093/ bioinformatics/btp341, June 10, 2009].
12. Ritz,K. (2007) The plate debate: Cultivable communities have no utility in contemporary environmental microbial ecology. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 60, 358-362.
13. Rivals,I. et al. (2007) Enrichment or depletion of a GO category within a class of genes. Bioinformatics, 23, 401-407.
14. Seshadri,R. et al. (2007) CAMERA: A community resource for metagenomics. PLOS Biol., 5, e75.
15. Tatusov,R. et al. (2003) The COG database: An updated version includes eukaryotes. BMC Genomics, 4, 41.