Travel and spatial patterns change when Chiropotes satanas chiropotes inhabit forest fragments

International Journal of Primatology

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 515-531

  Boyle, Sarah A ^a,b   Lourenço, Waldete C ^b   da Silva, Lívia R ^b   Smith, Andrew T ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SMITHSONIAN TROPICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Panama)

Author keywords

Amazon; Brazil; Conservation; Deforestation; Home range

Indexed keywords

DEFORESTATION; DEMOGRAPHY; FRUGIVORY; HABITAT CONSERVATION; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; PRIMATE; RANGE SIZE; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; VULNERABILITY;

AMAZONAS [BRAZIL]; BRAZIL; MANAUS; SOUTH AMERICA;

CHIROPOTES; CHIROPOTES SATANAS; PITHECIA;

EID: 70349986671     PISSN: 01640291     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10764-009-9357-y     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Achard, F., Eva, H. D., Stibig, H. J., Mayaux, P., Gallego, J., Richards, T., et al. (2002). Determination of deforestation rates of the world's humid tropical forests. Science, 297, 999-1002.
2. Altmann, J. (1974). Observational study of behavior: Sampling methods. Behaviour, 48, 227-265.
3. Anderson, J., Rowcliffe, J. M., & Colinshaw, G. (2007). Does the matrix matter? A forest primate in a complex agricultural landscape. Biological Conservation, 135, 212-222.
4. Attuquayefio, D. K., Gorman, M. L., & Wolton, R. J. (1986). Home range sizes in the wood mouse Apodmus sylvaticus: Habitat, sex and seasonal differences. Journal of Zoology, 210, 45-53.
5. Ayres, J. M. (1981). Observações sobre a ecologia e o comportamento dos cuxiús (Chiropotes albinasus e Chiropotes satanas, Cebidae: Primates). M.S. thesis. Manaus, Amazonas: Insituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia and Fundação Universidade do Amazonas.
6. Bicca-Marques, J. C. (2003). How do howler monkeys cope with habitat fragmentation? In L. K. Marsh (Ed.), Primates in fragments: Ecology and conservation (pp. 283-303). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
7. Bierregaard, R. O., Jr., Lovejoy, T. E., Kapos, V., Dossantos, A. A., & Hutchings, R. W. (1992). The biological dynamics of tropical rain-forest fragments. Bioscience, 42, 859-866.
8. Bierregaard, R. O., Jr., & Stouffer, P. C. (1997). Understory birds and dynamic habitat mosaics in Amazonian rainforests. In W. F. Laurance & R. O. Bierregaard Jr. (Eds.), Tropical forest remnants: Ecology, management, and conservation of fragmented communities (pp. 138-155). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9. Bingham, B. B., & Noon, B. R. (1997). Mitigation of habitat "take": Application to habitat conservation planning. Conservation Biology, 11, 127-139.
10. Bonvicino, C. R., Boubli, J. P., Otazú, I. B., Almeida, F. C., Nascimento, F. F., Coura, J. R., et al. (2003). Morphologic, karyotypic, and molecular evidence of a new form of Chiropotes (Primates, Pitheciinae). American Journal of Primatology, 61, 123-133.
11. Börger, L., Franconi, N., Ferretti, F., Meschi, F., de Michele, G., Gantz, A., et al. (2006). An integrated approach to indentify spatiotemporal and individual-level determinants of animal home range size. The American Naturalist, 168, 471-485.
12. Boyle, S. A. (2008a). The effects of forest fragmentation on primates in the Brazilian Amazon. Ph.D. dissertation. Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University.
13. Boyle, S. A. (2008b). Human impacts on primate conservation in central Amazonia. Tropical Conservation Science, 1, 6-17.
14. Boyle, S. A., Lourenço, W. A., da Silva, L. R., & Smith, A. T. (2009). Home range estimates vary with sample size and methods. Folia Primatologica, 80, 33-42.
15. Bull, E. L., & Holthausen, R. S. (1993). Habitat use and management of pileated woodpeckers in northeastern Oregon. Journal of Wildlife Management, 57, 335-345.
16. Burt, W. H. (1943). Territoriality and home range concepts as applied to mammals. Journal of Mammalogy, 24, 346-352.
17. Cederlund, G. N., & Okarma, H. (1988). Home range and habitat use of adult female moose. Journal of Wildlife Management, 52, 336-343.
18. Chapman, C. A., & Onderdonk, D. A. (1998). Forests without primates: Primate/plant codependency. American Journal of Primatology, 45, 127-141.
19. Clutton-Brock, T. H., & Harvey, P. H. (1977). Species differences in feeding and ranging behaviour in primates. In T. H. Clutton-Brock (Ed.), Primate ecology: Studies of feeding and ranging behaviour in lemurs, monkeys and apes (pp. 557-584). London: Academic Press.
20. Cristóbal-Azkarate, J., & Arroyo-Rodríguez, V. (2007). Diet and activity pattern of howler monkeys (Alouatta palliata) in Los Tuxtlas, Mexico: Effects of habitat fragmentation and implications for conservation. American Journal of Primatology, 69, 1-17.
21. Estrada, A., & Coates-Estrada, R. (1996). Tropical rain forest fragmentation and wild populations of primates at Los Tuxtlas, Mexico. International Journal of Primatology, 17, 759-783.
22. Estrada, A., Anzures, A., & Coates-Estrada, R. (1999). Tropical rain forest fragmentation, howler monkeys (Alouatta palliata), and dung beetles at Los Tuxtlas, Mexico. American Journal of Primatology, 48, 253-262.
23. Fedigan, L. M., Fedigan, L., Chapman, C., & Glander, K. E. (1988). Spider monkey home ranges: A comparison of radio telemetry and direct observation. American Journal of Primatology, 16, 19-29.
24. Ford, S. M., & Davis, L. C. (1992). Systematics and body size: Implications for feeding adaptation in New World monkeys. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 88, 415-468.
25. Gascon, C., Williamson, G. B., & da Fonseca, G. A. B. (2000). Ecology - Receding forest edges and vanishing reserves. Science, 288, 1356-1358.
26. Gascon, C., & Bierregaard, R. O., Jr. (2001). The biological dynamics of forest fragments project: The study site, experimental design, and research activity. In R. O. Bierregaard Jr., C. Gascon, T. E. Lovejoy & R. Mesquita (Eds.), Lessons from Amazonia: The ecology and conservation of a fragmented forest (pp. 31-42). New Haven: Yale University Press.
27. Gascon, C., Bierregaard, R. O., Jr., Laurance, W. F., & Rankin-De Mérona, J. M. (2001). Deforestation and forest fragmentation in the Amazon. In R. O. Bierregaard Jr., C. Gascon, T. E. Lovejoy & R. Mesquita (Eds.), Lessons from Amazonia: The ecology and conservation of a fragmented forest (pp. 22-30). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
28. Gese, E. M., Orrin, J. R., & Mytton, W. R. (1988). Home range and habitat use of coyotes in southeastern Colorado. Journal of Wildlife Management, 52, 640-646.
29. Gilbert, K. A. (2003). Primates and fragmentation of the Amazon forest. In L. K. Marsh (Ed.), Primates in fragments: Ecology and conservation (pp. 145-157). New York: Kluwer Academic.
30. Gilbert, K. A., & Setz, E. A. (2001). Primates in a fragmented landscape: Six species in Central Amazonia. In R. O. Bierregaard Jr., C. Gascon, T. E. Lovejoy & R. Mesquita (Eds.), Lessons from Amazonia: The ecology and conservation of a fragmented forest (pp. 262-270). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
31. Harcourt, A. H., & Doherty, D. A. (2005). Species-area relationships of primates in tropical forest fragments: A global analysis. Journal of Applied Ecology, 42, 630-637.
32. Harris, S., Cresswell, W. J., Forde, P. G., Trewhella, W. J., Woollard, T., & Wray, S. (1990). Home-range analysis using radio-tracing data-a review of problems and techniques particularly as applied to the study of mammals. Mammal Review, 20, 97-123.
33. Harvey, P. H., & Clutton-Brock, T. H. (1981). Primate home-range size and metabolic needs. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 8, 151-155.
34. Haskell, J. P., Ritchie, M. E., & Olff, H. (2002). Fractal geometry predicts varying body size scaling relationships for mammal and bird home ranges. Nature, 418, 527-530.
35. Hershkovitz, P. (1985). A preliminary taxonomic review of the South American bearded saki monkeys genus Chiropotes (Cebidae, Platyrrhini), with the description of a new subspecies. Fieldiana, 27, 1-46.
36. Hooge, P. N., & Eichenlaub, B. (1997). Animal Movement Extension to ArcView. Anchorage, AK: Alaska Biological Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey.
37. Irwin, M. T. (2007). Living in forest fragments reduces group cohesion in diademed sifakas (Propithecus diadema) in eastern Madagascar by reducting food patch size. American Journal of Primatology, 69, 434-447.
38. Irwin, M. T. (2008). Diademed sifaka (Propithecus diadema) ranging and habitat use in continuous and fragmented forest: higher density but lower viability in fragments? Biotropica, 40, 231-240.
39. Johns, A. D., & Skorupa, J. P. (1987). Responses of rain-forest primates to habitat disturbance - a review. International Journal of Primatology, 8, 157-191.
40. Kinzey, W. G., & Norconk, M. A. (1990). Hardness as a basis of fruit choice in two sympatric primates. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 81, 5-15.
41. Laurance, W. F., Delamonica, P., Laurance, S. G., Vasconcelos, H. L., & Lovejoy, T. E. (2000). Rainforest fragmentation kills big trees. Nature, 404, 836-836.
42. Laurance, W. F., Nascimento, H. E. M., Laurance, S. G., Andrade, A. C., Fearnside, P. M., Ribeiro, J. E. L., et al. (2006). Rain forest fragmentation and the proliferation of successional trees. Ecology, 87, 469-482.
43. Lee, J., & Wong, D. W. S. (2001). Statistical analysis with ArcView GIS. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
44. Lehman, S. M., Rajaonson, A., & Day, S. (2006). Lemur responses to edge effects in the Vohibola III Classified Forest, Madagascar. American Journal of Primatology, 68, 293-299.
45. Li, B., Chen, C., Ji, W., & Ren, B. (2000). Seasonal home range changes of the Sichuan snub-nosed monkey (Rhinopithecus roxellana) in the Qinling Mountains of China. Folia Primatologica, 71, 375-386.
46. Linnell, J. D. C., Andersen, R., Kvam, T., Andrén, H., Liberg, O., Odden, P., et al. (2001). Home range size and choice of management strategy for lynx in Scandinavia. Environmental Management, 27, 869-879.
47. Lovejoy, T. E., & Oren, D. C. (1981). The minimum critical size of ecosystems. In R. L. Burgess & D. M. Sharp (Eds.), Forest island dynamics in man-dominated landscapes (pp. 7-12). New York: Springer-Verlag.
48. Mace, G. M., & Harvey, P. H. (1983). Energetic constraints on home-range size. The American Naturalist, 121, 120-132.
49. Malcolm, J. R. (1997). Biomass and diversity of small mammals in Amazonian forest fragments. In W. F. Laurance & R. O. Bierregaard Jr. (Eds.), Tropical forest remnants: Ecology, management, and conservation of fragmented communities (pp. 207-221). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
50. Marsh, L. K. (2003). Primates in fragments: Ecology and conservation. New York: Kluwer Academic.
51. Martins, M. M., & Setz, E. Z. F. (2000). Diet of buffy tufted-eared marmosets (Callithrix aurita) in a forest fragment in southeastern Brazil. International Journal of Primatology, 21, 467-476.
52. Mbora, D. N. M., & Meikle, D. B. (2004). Forest fragmentation and the distribution, abundance and conservation of the Tana river red colobus (Procolobus rufomitratus). Biological Conservation, 118, 67-77.
53. Milton, K. (1984). Habitat, diet, and activity patterns of free-ranging woolly spider monkeys (Brachyteles arachnoides E. Geoffroy 1806). International Journal of Primatology, 5, 491-514.
54. Milton, K., & May, M. L. (1976). Body weight, diet and home range area in primates. Nature, 259, 459-462.
55. Norconk, M. A., & Kinzey, W. G. (1994). Challenge of neotropical frugivory: travel patterns of spider monkeys and bearded sakis. American Journal of Primatology, 34, 171-133.
56. Norconk, M. A., Raghanti, M. A., Martin, S. K., Grafton, B. W., Gregory, L. T., & De Dijn, B. P. E. (2003). Primates of Brownsberg Natuurpark, Suriname, with particular attention to the pitheciins. Neotropical Primates, 11, 94-100.
57. Odum, E. P., & Kuenzler, E. J. (1955). Measurement of territory and home range size in birds. Auk, 72, 128-137.
58. Onderdonk, D. A., & Chapman, C. A. (2000). Coping with forest fragmentation: the primates of Kibale National Park, Uganda. International Journal of Primatology, 21, 587-611.
59. Peetz, A. (2001). Ecology and social organization of the bearded saki Chiropotes satanas chiropotes (Primates: Pithecinae) in Venezuela. Ecotropical Monographs, 1, 1-170.
60. Powell, R. A. (2000). Animal home ranges and territories and home range estimators. In L. Boitani & T. K. Fuller (Eds.), Research techniques in animal ecology: Controversies and consequences (pp. 65-110). New York: Columbia University Press.
61. Rodgers, A. R., & Carr, A. P. (2002). HRE: The home range extension for ArcView. Ontario, Canada: Centre for Northern Forest Ecosystem Research, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources.
62. Rylands, A. B., & Keuroghlian, A. (1988). Primate populations in continuous forest and forest fragments in central Amazonia. Acta Amazônica, 18, 291-307.
63. Schwarzkopf, L., & Rylands, A. B. (1989). Primate species richness in relation to habitat structure in Amazonian rainforest fragments. Biological Conservation, 48, 1-12.
64. Silva, Jr., J. S., & Figueiredo, W. M. B. (2002). Revisão sistemática dos cuxiús, gênero Chiropotes Lesson, 1840 (Primates, Pithecidae) In Livro de resumos: Xth Congresso Brasileira de Primatologia: Amazônia-A última fronteira. Belém, Pará: Sociedade Brasileira de Primatologia.
65. Silva, S. S. B. (2003). Comportamento alimentar do cuxiú-preto (Chiropotes satanas) na área de influência do resrvatório da usina hidreléctric de Tucuruí-Pará. M.S. thesis. Belém, Pará: Museu Paraenses Emílio Goeldi and Universidade Federal do Pará.
66. Skorupa, J. P. (1986). Responses of rainforest primates to selective logging in Kibale Forest, Uganda: A summary report. In K. Benirschke (Ed.), Primates: The road to self-sustaining populations (pp. 57-70). New York: Springer-Verlag.
67. Strier, K. B. (2007). Conservation. In C. J. Campbell, A. Fuentes, K. C. MacKinnon, M. Panger & S. K. Bearder (Eds.), Primates in perspective (pp. 496-509). New York: Oxford University Press.
68. Tufto, J., Andersen, R., & Linnell, J. (1996). Habitat use and ecological correlates of home range size in a small cervid: the roe deer. Journal of Animal Ecology, 65, 715-724.
69. Tutin, C. E. G. (1999). Fragmented living: Behavioural ecology of primates in a forest fragment in the Lopé Reserve, Gabon. Primates, 40, 249-265.
70. Umapathy, G., & Kumar, A. (2003). Impacts of forest fragmentation on lion-tailed macaque and Nilgiri langur in Western Ghats, South India. In L. K. Marsh (Ed.), Primates in fragments: Ecology and conservation (pp. 163-189). New York: Kluwer Academic.
71. van Roosmalen, M. G. M., Mittermeier, R. A., & Milton, K. (1981). The bearded sakis, genus Chiropotes. In A. F. Coimbra-Filho & R. A. Mittermeier (Eds.), Ecology and behavior of neotropical primates (pp. 419-442). Rio de Janeiro: Academia Brasileira de Ciências.
72. van Roosmalen, M. G. M., Mittermeier, R. A., & Fleagle, J. G. (1988). Diet of the northern bearded saki (Chiropotes satanas chiropotes): A neotropical seed predator. American Journal of Primatology, 14, 11-35.
73. Veiga, L. M. (2006). A ecologia e o comportamento do cuxiú-preto (Chiropotes satanas) na paisagem fragmentada da Amazônia Oriental. Ph.D. dissertation. Belém, Pará: Universidade Federal do Pará.
74. Veiga, L. M., Silva, J., J. S., Mittermeier, R. A., & Boubli, J. P. (2008). Chiropotes chiropotes. In IUCN 2008. 2008 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. www.iucnredlist.org. Downloaded on 21 December 2008.
75. Wieczkowski, J. (2004). Ecological correlates of abundance in the Tana mangabey (Cercocebus galeritus). American Journal of Primatology, 63, 125-138.
76. Wiktander, U., Olsson, O., & Nilsson, S. G. (2001). Seasonal variation in home-range size, and habitat area requirement of the lesser spotted woodpecker (Dendrocopos minor) in southern Sweden. Biological Conservation, 100, 387-395.
77. Wong, S. N. P., & Sicotte, P. (2007). Activity budget and ranging patterns of Colobus vellerosus in forest fragments in central Ghana. Folia Primatologica, 78, 245-254.
78. Worton, B. J. (1987). A review of models of home range for animal movement. Ecological Modelling, 38, 277-298.