Pipeline iteration

ACL 2007 - Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 952-959

  Hollingshead, Kristy ^a   Roark, Brian ^a  

^a OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FINITE-STATE; RE-RANKING;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

PIPELINES;

EID: 70349965428     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. J.K. Baker. 1979. Trainable grammars for speech recognition. In Speech Communication papers for the 97th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America.
2. D. Blaheta and E. Charniak. 1999. Automatic compensation for parser figure-of-merit flaws. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of ACL, pages 513-518.
3. S. Caraballo and E. Charniak. 1998. New figures of merit for best-first probabilistic chart parsing. Computational Linguistics, 24(2):275-298.
4. E. Charniak and M. Johnson. 2005. Coarse-to-fine n-best parsing and MaxEnt discriminative reranking. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of ACL, pages 173-180.
5. E. Charniak, S. Goldwater, and M. Johnson. 1998. Edge-based best-first chart parsing. In Proceedings of the 6th Workshop for Very Large Corpora, pages 127-133.
6. E. Charniak, M. Johnson, M. Elsner, J.L. Austerweil, D. Ellis, S.R. Iyangar, J. Moore, M.T. Pozar, C. Hill, T.Q. Vu, and I. Haxton. 2006. Multi-level course-to-fine PCFG parsing. In Proceedings of the HLT-NAACL Annual Meeting, pages 168-175.
7. E. Charniak. 2000. A Maximum-Entropy-inspired parser. In Proceedings of the 1st Annual Meeting of NAACL and 6th Conference on ANLP, pages 132-139.
8. J.R. Finkel, C.D. Manning, and A.Y. Ng. 2006. Solving the problem of cascading errors: Approximate Bayesian inference for linguistic annotation pipelines. In Proceedings of EMNLP, pages 618-626.
9. J. Fiscus. 1997. A post-processing system to yield reduced word error rates: Recognizer output voting error reduction (ROVER). In Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding.
10. V. Goel, S. Kumar, and W. Byrne. 2000. Segmental minimum Bayes-risk ASR voting strategies. In Proceedings of ICSLP, pages 139-142.
11. J. Goodman. 1996. Parsing algorithms and metrics. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of ACL, pages 177-183.
12. J. Goodman. 1998. Parsing inside-out. Ph.D. thesis, Harvard University.
13. K. Hall and M. Johnson. 2004. Attention shifting for parsing speech. In Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting of ACL, pages 40-46.
14. K. Hollingshead, S. Fisher, and B. Roark. 2005. Comparing and combining finite-state and context-free parsers. In Proceedings of HLT-EMNLP, pages 787-794.
15. K. Lari and S.J. Young. 1990. The estimation of stochastic context-free grammars using the inside-outside algorithm. Computer Speech and Language, 4(1):35-56.
16. M.P. Marcus, M.A. Marcinkiewicz, and B. Santorini. 1993. Building a large annotated corpus of English: The Penn treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19:314-330.
17. D. McClosky, E. Charniak, and M. Johnson. 2006. Reranking and self-training for parser adaptation. In Proceedings of COLING-ACL, pages 337-344.
18. F.J. Och and H. Ney. 2003. A systematic comparison of various statistical alignment models. Computational Linguistics, 29.
19. A. Ratnaparkhi. 1999. Learning to parse natural language with maximum entropy models. Machine Learning, 34(1-3):151-175.
20. F. Sha and F. Pereira. 2003. Shallow parsing with conditional random fields. In Proceedings of the HLT-NAACL Annual Meeting, pages 134-141.
21. E.F. Tjong Kim Sang and S. Buchholz. 2000. Introduction to the CoNLL-2000 shared task: Chunking. In Proceedings of CoNLL, pages 127-132.
22. A. Yeh. 2000. More accurate tests for the statistical significance of result differences. In Proceedings of the 18th International COLING, pages 947-953.