Attention shifting for parsing speech

Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 40-46

  Hall, Keith ^a   Johnson, Mark ^b  

^a Brown Univerity   (United States)

^b BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ITERATIVE METHODS; MODELING LANGUAGES; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; SYNTACTICS;

ATTENTION SHIFTING; IT FOCUS; LANGUAGE MODEL; MULTI-STAGES; PROBABILISTICS; SPEECH RECOGNITION LANGUAGES; SYNTACTIC ANALYSIS;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

EID: 84858407423     PISSN: 0736587X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Don Blaheta and Eugene Charniak. 1999. Automatic compensation for parser figure-of-merit flaws. In Proceedings of the 37th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 513–518.
2. Robert J. Bobrow. 1990. Statistical agenda parsing. In DARPA Speech and Language Workshop, pages 222–224.
3. Sharon Caraballo and Eugene Charniak. 1998. New figures of merit for best-first probabilistic chart parsing. Computational Linguistics, 24(2):275–298, June.
4. Eugene Charniak, Don Blaheta, Niyu Ge, Keith Hall, John Hale, and Mark Johnson. 1999. BLLIP 1987–89 wsj corpus release 1. LDC corpus LDC2000T43.
5. Eugene Charniak. 1993. Statistical Language Learning. MIT Press.
6. Eugene Charniak. 2000. A maximum-entropy-inspired parser. In Proceedings of the 2000 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics., ACL, New Brunswick, NJ.
7. Eugene Charniak. 2001. Immediate-head parsing for language models. In Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.
8. Ciprian Chelba and Frederick Jelinek. 1998. A study on richer syntactic dependencies for structured language modeling. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pages 225–231.
9. Sharon Goldwater, Eugene Charniak, and Mark Johnson. 1998. Best-first edge-based chart parsing. In 6th Annual Workshop for Very Large Corpora, pages 127–133.
10. Joshua Goodman. 1997. Global thresholding and multiple-pass parsing. In Proceedings of the Second Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 11–25.
11. Joshua Goodman. 2001. A bit of progress in language modeling, extendend version. In Microsoft Research Technical Report MSR-TR-2001-72.
12. Keith Hall and Mark Johnson. 2003. Language modeling using efficient best-first bottom-up parsing. In Proceedings of IEEE Automated Speech Recognition and Understanding Workshop.
13. Mark Johnson. 1998. PCFG models of linguistic tree representations. Computational Linguistics, 24:617–636.
14. Dan Klein and Christopher D. Manning. 2003. Accurate unlexicalized parsing. In Proceedings of the 41st Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL-03).
15. Christopher D. Manning and Hinrich Schütze. 1999. Foundations of statistical natural language processing. MIT Press.
16. Mitchell Marcus, Beatrice Santorini, and Mary Ann Marcinkiewicz. 1993. Building a large annotated corpus of english: The penn treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19:313–330.
17. Brian Roark. 2001. Probabilistic top-down parsing and language modeling. Computational Linguistics, 27(3):249–276.
18. Peng Xu, Ciprian Chelba, and Frederick Jelinek. 2002. A study on richer syntactic dependencies for structured language modeling. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 191–198.