Enantiospecific synthesis and allylation of all-carbon-substituted a-chiral allylic stannanes

Angewandte Chemie - International Edition

Volumn 48, Issue 25, 2009, Pages 4634-4638

  Schmidtmann, Eric S ^a   Oestreich, Martin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Allylation; Allylic substitution; Enantiospecificity; Stannanes; Stereoselective synthesis

Indexed keywords

ALLYLATION; ALLYLIC SUBSTITUTION; ENANTIOSPECIFICITY; STANNANES; STEREOSELECTIVE SYNTHESIS;

COMPLEXATION; STEREOCHEMISTRY; SUBSTITUTION REACTIONS; ZINC;

STEREOSELECTIVITY;

EID: 70349939395     PISSN: 14337851     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/anie.200901384     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. For comprehensive overviews, see: a) B. W. Gung in Organic Reactions, Vol. 64 (Ed.: L. E. Overman). Wiley, Hoboken, 2004, pp. 1-113:
2. b) R. L. Marshall in Science of Synthesis, Vol. 5 (Ed.: M. G. Molony), Thieme, Stuttgart, 2003, pp. 573-605.
3. For authoritative reviews, see: a) J. A. Marshall, J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 8153-8166;
4. b) J. A. Marshall, Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 31-47.
5. For selected reviews on carbonyl allylation, see: a) J. F. Bower, I. S. Kim, R. L. Patman, M. J. Krische, Angew. Chem. 2009, 121, 36-48;
6. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009. 48, 34-46 (for a nice summary of chiral allylic metal reagents in the introduction);
7. b) H. Lachance, D. G. Hall in Organic Reactions, Vol. 73 (Ed.: S. E. Denmark), Wiley, Hoboken, 2008, pp. 1 -573 (for a comprehensive overview of allylboration);
8. c) S. E. Denmark, J. Fu, Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 2763-2794;
9. d) S. E. Denmark, N. G. Almstead in Modern Carbonyl Chemistry (Ed.: J. Otera), Wiley, Weinheim, 2000, pp. 299-401;
10. e) S. E. Chemler, W R. Roush in Modern Carbonyl Chemistry (Ed.: J. Otera), Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2000, pp. 403-490;
11. f) C. E. Masse, J. S. Panek, Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 1293-1316;
12. g) Y. Yamamoto. N. Asao, Chem. Rev. 1993, 93, 2207-2293.
13. a) V. J. Jephcote. A. J. Pratt, E. J. Thomas, J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1984, 800-802;
14. b) A. J. Pratt, E. J. Thomas, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1 1989, 1521-1527.
15. a) T. Krämer, J.-R. Schwark, D. Hoppe, Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 7037-7040;
16. b) J. A. Marshall, G. S. Welmaker, B. W. Gung. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 647-656.
17. To the best of our knowledge, only a single study on the deliberate preparation of Z-configured a-chiral allylic stannanes has been reported: S. Okamoto, S.-i. Matsuda, D. K. An, F. Sato, Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 6323-6326.
18. For selected syntheses of (primary) allylic stannanes by allylic substitution, see: a) Y. Naruta. K. Maruyama. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1983, 1264-1265;
19. b) B. M. Trost, J. W. Herndon, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 1706, 6835-6837;
20. c) S. Matsubara, K. Wakamatsu, Y. Morizawa, N. Tsuboniwa, K. Oshima, H. Nozaki, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1985, 58, 1196-1199;
21. d) S. Weigand. R. Brückner, Synthesis 1996, 475-482:
22. e) O. A. Wallner, K. J. Szabó, Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 1829-1831.
23. Oshima and Nozaki tested bis(triorganostannyl) zinc compounds as nucleophilic sources of tin among seminal contributions to transition-metal- catalyzed carbon-element bond formation: a) J.-i. Hibino, S. Matsubara, Y. Morizawa, K. Oshima, H. Nozaki. Tetrahedron Lett. 1984, 25, 2151-2154:
24. b) S. Matsubara, J.-i. Hibino, Y. Morizawa, K. Oshima, H. Nozaki, J. Organomet. Chem. 1985, 285, 163-172.
25. Tin-based zinc reagents have been employed in 1,2-additions to aldehydes: a) S. Mohapatra, A. Bandyopadhyay, D. K. Barma, J. H. Capdevila, J. R. Falck, Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 4759-4762;
26. b) A. He. J. R. Falck, Angew. Chem. 2008, 120, 6688-6691:
27. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 6586-6589.
28. Y. Yamamoto, Acc. Chem. Res 1987, 20, 243-249.
29. For copper-catalyzed reactions of silicon-based zinc reagents, see: a) M. Oestreich, B. Weiner, Synlett 2004, 2139-2142 (for conjugate addition);
30. b) M. Oestreich, G. Auer, Adv. Synth. Catal. 2005, 347. 637-640 (for allylic substitution);
31. c) G. Auer, M. Oestreich, Chem. Commun. 2006, 311-313 (for reactions with alkynes, 1,3-dienes, and styrene).
32. E. S. Schmidtmann, M. Oestreich, Chem. Commun. 2006, 3643-3645.
33. Although triorganostannyl lithium compounds are already relatively soft, in contrast to the related hard triorganosilyl lithium reagents, it is necessary to form the corresponding zinc compounds to enable the allylic substitution of benzoates and acetates without deacylation.
34. 2O might be advantageous (see the Supporting Information).
35. M. A. Vincent, I. H. Hillier, R. J. Hall, E. J. Thomas, J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 4680-4684.
36. The relative configuration was determined unequivocally for both diastereomers following a reductive ozonolyis and acetal-ization (see the Supporting Information).
37. G. Bringmann, G. Künkel, T. Geuder, Synlett 1990, 253-255.
38. S. E. Denmark, E.J. Weber, T.M. Wilson, T.M. Willson, Tetrahedron 1989, 45, 1053-1065.
39. For reactions with aldehydes, see: a) Y. Yamamoto, Y. Saito, K. Maruyama, J. Organomet. Chem. 1985, 292. 311-318;
40. b) G. E. Keck, D. R. Romer, J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 6083-6089;
41. c) J. M. Tinsley, E. Mertz, P. Y. Chong, R.-A. F. Rarig, W R. Roush, Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 4245-4248.
42. Reaction with glyoxalates would yield versatile Panek-type systems: R. T. Beresis, J. S. Solomon. M. G. Yang, N. F. Yain. J. S. Panek, Org. Synth. 1997, 75. 78-86.