Botanical literacy: What and how should students learn about plants?

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 96, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 1753-1759

  Uno, Gordon E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

Author keywords

Botanical literacy; Inquiry instruction; Learning theory; Misconceptions; Scientific literacy; Thinking skills

Indexed keywords

BOTANY; LEARNING; LITERACY; STUDENT;

EID: 70349932416     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.0900025     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Bauerlein, M. 2008. The dumbest generation: How the digital age stupefies young Americans and jeopardizes our future. Penguin Group, New York, New York, USA.
2. Biological Sciences Curriculum Study. 1993. Developing biological literacy. BSCS, Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA.
3. Bransford, J. D., A. L. Brown, and R. R. Cocking. 1999. How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
4. Cohen, G. L., J. Garcia, V. Purdie-Vaughns, N. Apfel, and P. Brzustoski. 2009. Recursive processes in self-affirmation: Intervening to close the minority achievement gap. Science 324: 400-403.
5. Cunningham, S., and Y. George [eds.]. 2004. Invention and impact: Building excellence in undergraduate science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education. American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS], Washington, D.C., USA.
6. D' Avanzo, C. 2008. Biology concept inventories: Overview, status, and next steps. Bio Science 58: 1079-1085.
7. Dean, C. 2005. Scientific savvy? In U.S., not much. New York Times, 30 August. Website http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/30/science/30profile.html.
8. Dobzhansky, T. 1973. Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. American Biology Teacher 35: 125-129.
9. Fox, M. A., and N. Hackerman [eds.]. 2003. Evaluating and improving undergraduate education in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
10. Friedman, T. L. 2005. The world is flat. Farrar Straus and Giroux, New York, New York, USA.
11. Harris Interactive Poll. 2008. U.S. leisure time plummets 20% in 2008 [online]. Website http://www.marketingcharts.com/television/ us-leisure-time-plummets-20-in-2008-hits-new-low-7470/harris-interactive-poll-favorite-leisure-activities-december-2008jpg/ [accessed 14 April 2009].
12. Hershey, D. R. 2004. Avoid misconceptions when teaching about plants [online]. Website http://www.actionbioscience.org/education/her-shey.html [accessed 23 July 2008].
13. Hershey, D. R. 2005. More misconceptions to avoid when teaching about plants [online]. Website http://www.actionbioscience.org/education/hershey3.html [accessed 23 July 2008].
14. Hestenes, D., M. Wells, and G. Swackhamer. 1992. Force concept inventory. Physics Teacher 30: 141-151.
15. Huang, A. S. 2009. Science needs ace communicators and politicians. Science News 175: 32.
16. Kingsolver, B., S. L. Hopp, and C. Kingsolver. 2007. Animal, vegetable, miracle: A year of food life. Harper Collins, New York, New York, USA.
17. Laugksch, R. C.2000. Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview. Science Education 84: 71-94.
18. Marbach-Ad, G. 2004. Expectations and difficulties of first year college students in biology. Journal of College Science Teaching 33: 18-23.
19. McCray, R. A., R. L. DeHaan, and J. A. Schuck [eds.]. 2003. Improving undergraduate instruction in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
20. Miller, J. D. 1998. The measurement of civic scientific literacy. Public Understanding of Science 7: 203-223.
21. Miller, S., C. Pfund, C. M. Pribbenow, and J. Handelsman. 2008. Scientific teaching in practice. Science 322: 1329-1330.
22. Mintzes, J. J., J. H. Wandersee, and J. D. Novak. 1998. Teaching science for understanding: A human constructivist view. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA.
23. National Academy of Sciences. 2007. Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
24. National Research Council. 1999. Transforming undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
25. Pellegrino, J. W., N. Chudowsky, and R. Glaser [eds.]. 2001. Knowing what students know: the science and design of educational assessment. National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
26. National Science Foundation.2007. Asia's rising science and technology strength. Special report 07-319, National Science Foundation, Arlington, Virginia, USA.
27. National Survey of Student Engagement. 2004. Annual report. Center for Postsecondary Research, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.
28. Pollan, M. 2001. The botany of desire. Random House, New York, New York, USA.
29. Sundberg, M. D. 2004. Where is botany going? Plant Science Bulletin 50: 2-7.
30. Uno, G. E. 1994. The state of pre-college botanical education. American Biology Teacher 56: 263-266.
31. Uno, G. E. 2007. The struggle for botany majors. Plant Science Bulletin 53: 102-103.
32. Wandersee, J. H., J. J. Mintzes, and J. D. Novak. 1994. Research on alternative conceptions in science. In D. Gabel [ed.],Handbook of research on science teaching and learning: A project of the National Science Teachers Association, 177-210. Macmillan, New York, New York, USA.
33. Wandersee, J. H., and E. E. Schussler.1999. Preventingplantblindness. American Biology Teacher 61: 84-86.
34. Wiggins, G., and J. McTighe. 2005. Understanding by design. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria, Virginia, USA.
35. Wilson, C. D., C. W. Anderson, M. Heidemann, J. Merrill, B. W. Merritt, G. Richmond, D. F. Sibley, and J. M. Parker. 2006. Assessing students' ability to trace matter in dynamic systems in cell biology. CBE Life Sciences Education 5: 323-331.