Does concomitant low back pain affect revision total knee arthroplasty outcomes?

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 467, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 2623-2629

  Novicoff, Wendy M ^a   Rion, David ^a   Mihalko, William M ^a   Saleh, Khaled J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LOW BACK PAIN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCORING SYSTEM; SHORT FORM 36; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; HOSPITALIZATION; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; NORTH AMERICA; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE; REOPERATION; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOW BACK PAIN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NORTH AMERICA; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PAIN MEASUREMENT; QUESTIONNAIRES; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 70349924105     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-0882-y     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons. National Hospital Discharge Survey, 1991-2004. US Department of Health and Human Services; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; National Center for Health Statistics. Available at: http://www.aaos.org/Research/stats/Knee%20Revision%20Chart.pdf. Accessed May 31, 2008.
2. N Bellamy WW Buchanan 1984 Outcome measurement in osteoarthritis clinical trials: the case for standardization Clin Rheumatol. 3 293 303 6488707 10.1007/BF02032334 1:STN:280:DyaL2M%2FisFyjsA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 15072109)
3. N Bellamy WW Buchanan CH Goldsmith J Campbell LW Stitt 1988 Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee J Rheumatol. 15 1833 1840 3068365 1:STN:280:DyaL1M7lslCrsQ%3D%3D
4. KJ Bozic S Durbhakula DJ Berry JM Naessens K Rappaport M Cisternas KJ Saleh HE Rubash 2005 Differences in patient and procedure characteristics and hospital resource use in primary and revision total joint arthroplasty: a multicenter study J Arthroplasty. 20 suppl 3 17 25 16213998 10.1016/j.arth.2005. 04.021 (Pubitemid 41425781)
5. CM Callahan BG Drake DA Heck RS Dittus 1994 Patient outcomes following tricompartmental total knee replacement: a meta-analysis JAMA. 271 1349 1357 8158821 10.1001/jama.271.17.1349 1:STN:280:DyaK2c3htVKqsg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 24132462)
6. RD Crowninshield AG Rosenberg SM Sporer 2006 Changing demographics of patients with total joint replacement Clin Orthop Relat Res. 443 266 272 16462450 10.1097/01.blo.0000188066.01833.4f (Pubitemid 44324955)
7. RV Deshmukh RD Scott 2001 Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: long-term results Clin Orthop Relat Res. 392 272 278 11716395 10.1097/00003086-200111000- 00035
8. A Escobar JM Quintana A Bilbao J Azkarate JI Guenaga JC Arenaza LF Gutierrez 2007 Effect of patient characteristics on reported outcomes after total knee replacement Rheumatology. 46 112 119 16735451 10.1093/rheumatology/ kel184 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28jis12hsA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 44932797)
9. O Ethgen O Bruyère F Richy C Dardennes JY Reginster 2004 Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty: a qualitative and systematic review of the literature J Bone Joint Surg Am. 86 963 974 15118039
10. RC Hartley NG Barton-Hanson R Finley RW Parkinson 2002 Early patient outcomes after primary and revision total knee arthroplasty: a prospective study J Bone Joint Surg Br. 84 994 999 12358393 10.1302/0301-620X.84B7.12607 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38vpslSltw%3D%3D
11. G Hawker C Melfi J Paul R Green C Bombardier 1995 Comparison of a generic (SF-36) and a disease specific (WOMAC) (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) instrument in the measurement of outcomes after knee replacement surgery J Rheumatol. 22 1193 1196 7674255 1:STN:280:DyaK2MvgsVGltA%3D%3D
12. G Hawker J Wright P Coyte J Paul R Dittus R Croxford B Katz C Bombardier D Heck D Freund 1998 Health-related quality of life after knee replacement J Bone Joint Surg Am. 80 163 173 9486722 1:STN:280:DyaK1c7ks1WhtQ%3D%3D
13. DA Heck RL Robinson CM Partridge RM Lubitz DA Freund 1998 Patient outcomes after knee replacement Clin Orthop Relat Res. 356 93 110 9917673 10.1097/00003086-199811000-00015
14. JN Insall LD Dorr RD Scott WS Norman 1989 Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system Clin Orthop Relat Res. 248 13 14 2805470
15. RL Kane KJ Saleh TJ Wilt B Bershadsky 2005 The functional outcomes of total knee arthroplasty J Bone Joint Surg Am. 87 1719 1724 16085610 10.2106/JBJS.D.02714 (Pubitemid 41061189)
16. RL Kane KJ Saleh TJ Wilt B Bershadsky WW Cross III RM MacDonald I Rutks 2003 Total knee replacement Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ). 86 1 8
17. DM Kennedy PW Stratford DL Riddle SE Hanna JD Golish 2008 Assessing recovery and establishing prognosis following total knee arthroplasty Phys Ther. 88 22 32 17986495
18. S Kurtz F Mowat K Ong N Chan E Lau M Halpern 2005 Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002 J Bone Joint Surg Am. 87 1487 1497 15995115 10.2106/JBJS.D.02441 (Pubitemid 40917748)
19. S Kurtz K Ong E Lau F Mowat M Halpern 2007 Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030 J Bone Joint Surg Am. 89 780 785 17403800 10.2106/JBJS.F.00222 (Pubitemid 46564282)
20. SM Kurtz KL Ong J Schmier K Zhao F Mowat E Lau 2009 Primary and revision arthroplasty surgery caseloads in the United States from 1990 to 2004 J Arthroplasty. 24 195 203 18534428 10.1016/j.arth.2007.11.015
21. C Lavernia DJ Lee VH Hernandez 2006 The increasing financial burden of knee revision surgery in the United States Clin Orthop Relat Res. 446 221 226 16672891 10.1097/01.blo.0000214424.67453.9a (Pubitemid 44318285)
22. M Lequesne 1991 Indices of severity and disease activity for osteoarthritis Semin Arthritis Rheum. 20 6suppl 2 48 54 1866630 10.1016/0049-0172(91)90027-W 1:STN:280:DyaK3Mzislaiuw%3D%3D
23. EA Lingard JN Katz RJ Wright EA Wright CB Sledge 2001 Kinemax Outcomes Group. Validity and responsiveness of the Knee Society Clinical Rating System in comparison with the SF-36 and WOMAC J Bone Joint Surg Am. 83 1856 1864 11741066
24. CA McHorney JE Ware Jr JF Lu CD Sherbourne 1994 The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups Med Care. 32 40 66 8277801 10.1097/00005650-199401000-00004 1:STN:280:DyaK2c7gsVeltQ%3D%3D
25. CA McHorney JE Ware Jr AE Raczek 1993 The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs Med Care. 31 247 263 8450681 10.1097/00005650-199303000-00006 1:STN:280:DyaK3s7ps1antA%3D%3D
26. National Arthritis Data Workgroup 2008 Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the United States Arthritis Rheum. 58 26 35 10.1002/art.23176
27. National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health, US Department of Health and Human Services. Handout on Health: Backpain. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health; 2005. NIH Publication No 05-5282.
28. JA Rand DM Ilstrup 1991 Survivorship analysis of total knee arthroplasty: cumulative rates of survival of 9200 total knee arthroplasties J Bone Joint Surg Am. 73 397 409 2002078 1:STN:280:DyaK3M7mtFKntQ%3D%3D
29. P Rasanen P Paavolainen H Sintonen AM Koivisto M Blom OP Ryynanen RP Roine 2007 Effectiveness of hip or knee replacement surgery in terms of quality-adjusted life years and costs Acta Orthop. 78 108 115 17453401 10.1080/17453670610013501 (Pubitemid 46570266)
30. KJ Saleh K Mulhall B Bershadsky H Ghomrawi LE White CM Buyea K Krackow 2005 Development and validation of a lower-extremity activity scale: use for patients treated with revision total knee arthroplasty J Bone Joint Surg Am. 87 1985 1994 16140813 10.2106/JBJS.D.02564 (Pubitemid 41279129)
31. KJ Saleh ER Santos HM Ghomrawi J Parvizi KJ Muhall 2006 Socioeconomic issues and demographics of total knee arthroplasty revision Clin Orthop Relat Res. 446 15 21 16672866 10.1097/01.blo.0000214416.91216.77 (Pubitemid 44318257)
32. RK Shields LJ Enloe KC Leo 1999 Health related quality of life in patients with total hip or knee replacement Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 80 572 579 10326924 10.1016/S0003-9993(99)90202-2 1:STN:280:DyaK1M3ls1ymtA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 29221050)
33. JE Ware Jr CD Sherborne 1992 The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection Med Care. 30 473 483 1593914 10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002
34. SL Whitehouse EA Lingard JN Katz ID Learmonth 2003 Development and testing of a reduced WOMAC function scale J Bone Joint Surg Br. 85 706 711 12892194 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3szlvFanuw%3D%3D