Suitability of GRIND-based principal properties for the description of molecular similarity and ligand-based virtual screening

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Volumn 49, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 2129-2138

  Durán, Ángel ^a   Zamora, Ismael ^a   Pastor, Manuel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LIGANDS;

DESCRIPTORS; GRID-INDEPENDENT; MOLECULAR SIMILARITY; STANDARD CONDITIONS; VIRTUAL SCREENING;

QUALITY CONTROL;

LIGAND;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; DRUG DESIGN; DRUG SCREENING; FEASIBILITY STUDY; METHODOLOGY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PROTEIN DATABASE; QUALITY CONTROL;

DATABASES, PROTEIN; DRUG DESIGN; DRUG EVALUATION, PRECLINICAL; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; LIGANDS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; QUALITY CONTROL; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 70349919668     PISSN: 15499596     EISSN: 1549960X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci900228x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Martin, Y. C.; Kofron, J. L.; Traphagen, L. M. Do structurally similar molecules have similar biological activity. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 19, 4350-4358.
2. Johnson, M.; Lajiness, M.; Maggiora, G. Molecular similarity: a basis for designing drug screening programs. Prog. Clin. Biol. Res. 1989. 291, 167-171.
3. Lajiness, M. S.; Johnson, M. A.; Maggiora, G. M. Implementing drug screening programs using molecular similarity methods. Pmg. Clin. Biol. Res. 1989, 291, 173-176.
4. Willett, P.; Barnard, J. M.; Downs, G. M. Chemical Similarity Searching. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 6, 983-996.
5. Hristozov, D.; Oprea, T. I.; Gasteiger, J. Ligand-based virtual screening by novelty detection with self-organizing maps. J. Chem. lnf. Model. 2007, 6, 2044-2062.
6. Muchmore, S. W.; Debe, D. A.; Metz, J. T.; Brown, S. P.; Martin, Y. C.; Hajduk, P. J. Application of belief theory to similarity data fusion for use in analog searching and lead hopping. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2008, 5, 941-948.
7. Pastor, M.; Cruciani, G.; McLay, I.; Pickett, S.; Clementi, S. GRid- INdependent descriptors (GRIND): a novel class of alignment- independent three-dimensional molecular descriptors. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 17, 3233-3243.
8. Pastor, M. Alignment-independent Descriptors from Molecular Interaction Fields. In Molecular Interaction Fields, Applications in Drug Discovery and ADME Prediction; Cruciani, G., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2005; pp 117-143.
9. Duran, A.; Martinez, G. C.; Pastor, M. Development and validation of AMANDA, a new algorithm for selecting highly relevant regions in Molecular Interaction Fields. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2008, 9, 1813-1823.
10. Gregori-Puigjane, E.; Mestres, J. SHED: Shannon entropy descriptors from topological feature distributions. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2006, 4, 1615-1622.
11. Carosati, E.; Mannhold, R.; Wahl, P.; Hansen, J. B.; Fremming, T.; Zamora, I.; Cianchetta, G.; Baroni, M. Virtual screening for novel openers of pancreatic K(ATP) channels. J. Med. Chem. 2007, 9, 2117-2126.
12. Skagerberg, B.; Bonelli, D.; Clementi, S.; Cruciani, G.; Ebert, C. Principal Properties for Aromatic Substituents. A Multivariate Approach for Design in QSAR. Quant. Struct. Act. Relat. 1989, 1, 32-38.
13. Hellberg, S.; Sjoestroem, M.; Skagerberg, B.; Wold, S. Peptide quantitative structure-activity relationships, a multivariate approach. J. Med. Chem. 1987, 7, 1126-1135.
14. Oprea, T. I.; Gottfries, J. Chemography: the art of navigating in chemical space. J Comb. Chem. 2001, 2, 157-166.
15. Larsson, J.; Gottfries, J.; Muresan, S.; Backlund, A. ChemGPS-NP: tuned for navigation in biologically relevant chemical space. J. Nat. Prod. 2007, 5, 789-794.
16. Olah, M.; Mracec, M.; Ostopovici, L.; Rad, R.; Bora, A.; Hadaruga, N.; Olah, I.; Banda, M.; Simon, Z.; Mracec, M.; Oprea, T. I. WOMBAT: World of Molecular Bioactivity. In Chemoinformatics in Drug Discovery; Oprea, T. I., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: New York, 2004; pp 223-239.
17. Oprea, T. I.; Davis, A. M.; Teague, S. J.; Leeson, P. D. Is there a difference between leads and drugs? A historical perspective. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 5, 1308-1315.
18. Good, A. C.; Oprea, T. I. Optimization of CAMD techniques 3. Virtual screening enrichment studies: a help or hindrance in tool selection. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 2008, 3-4, 169-178.
19. CORINA; Version 2. 4; Molecular Networks GmbH: Erlangen, Germany; 2001.
20. GOLPE, Version 4. 6. 0; Multivariate Infometric Analysis Srl. : Perugia, Italy; 2003.
21. Hudson, B. D.; Hyde, R. M.; Rahr, E.; Wood, J.; Osman, J. Parameter Based Methods for Compound Selection from Chemical Databases. Quant. Struct. Act. Relat. 1996, 4, 285-289.
22. Marengo, E.; Todeschini, R. A new algorithm for optimal, distance- based experimental design. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1992, 1, 37-44.
23. Huang, N.; Shoichet, B. K.; Irwin, J. J. Benchmarking sets for molecular docking. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 23, 6789-6801.
24. von Korff, M.; Freyss, J.; Sander, T. Comparison of Ligand- and Structure-Based Virtual Screening on the DUD Data Set. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2009, 49, 209-231.
25. Irwin, J. J.; Shoichet, B. K. ZINC- a free database of commercially available compounds for virtual screening. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2005, 1, 177-182.
26. Pentacle, Version 1. 0. 3; Molecular Discovery Ltd. : Perugia, Italy; 2009.
27. Wold, S.; Esbensen, K.; Geladi, P. Principal component analysis. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1987, 1 - 3, 37-52.
28. Truchon, J. F.; Bayly, C. I. Evaluating virtual screening methods: good and bad metrics for the "early recognition" problem. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2007, 2, 488-508.
29. De Maesschalck, R.; Jouan-Rimbaud, D.; Massart, D. L. The Mahal- anobis distance. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2000, 1, 1-18.
30. SPSS, version 12; SPSS Inc. : Chicago, IL., 2003.
31. Hert, J.; Willett, P.; Wilton, D. J.; Acklin, P.; Azzaoui, K.; Jacoby, E.; Schuffenhauer, A. Comparison of fingerprint-based methods for virtual screening using multiple bioactive reference structures. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 3, 1177-1185.
32. Hristozov, D. P.; Oprea, T. I.; Gasteiger, J. Virtual screening applications: a study of ligand-based methods and different structure representations in four different scenarios. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 2007, 10-11, 617-640.
33. Masek, B. B.; Shen, L.; Smith, K. M.; Pearlman, R. S. Sharing chemical information without sharing chemical structure. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2008, 2, 256-261.