Should jitter be measured by peak picking or by waveform matching?

Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica

Volumn 61, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 305-308

  Boersma, Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER; GLOTTIS; MEASUREMENT; NOISE; NOTE; PITCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SOUND; SPEECH; VOICE; WAVEFORM; WHITE NOISE;

HUMANS; SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY; SPEECH; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; SPEECH PRODUCTION MEASUREMENT; TIME FACTORS; VOICE DISORDERS;

EID: 70349894136     PISSN: 10217762     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000245159     Document Type: Note

References (5)

1. Maryn P, Corthals P, De Brodt M, Van Cauwenberge P, Deliyski D: Perturbation Measures of Voice: a comparative study between Multi-Dimensional Voice Program and Praat. Folia Phoniatr Logop 2009; 61: 217-226.
2. Kay Elemetrics Corp: Multi-Dimensional Voice Program (MDVP) Model 5105: Software Instruction Manual. Lincoln Park, Kay Elemetrics, 2003.
3. Boersma P: Stemmen meten met Praat. Stem-, Spraak- en Taalpathologie 2004; 12: 237-251.
4. Titze IR, Liang H: Comparison of F 0 extraction methods for high-precision voice perturbation measurements. J Speech Hear Res 1993; 36: 1120-1133.
5. Parsa V, Jamieson DG: A comparison of high precision F0 extraction algorithms for sustained vowels. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1999; 42: 112-126.