The role of ideology in shaping academics' conceptions of their discipline

Teaching in Higher Education

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 565-577

  Fanghanel, Joëlle ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WEST LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Discipline; Ideology; Socio cultural theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349876839     PISSN: 13562517     EISSN: 14701294     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13562510903186790     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Allen, M., and P. Ainley. 2007. Education make you fick, innit?: What's gone wrong with England's schools, colleges and universities and how to start putting it right. London: Tufnell Press.
2. Barnett, R. 1990. The idea of higher education. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
3. Barnett, R. 2000. Realising the university in an age of supercomplexity. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
4. Bauman, Z. 1997. Universities: Old, new and different. In The postmodern university? Contested visions of higher education in society, eds. A. Smith and F. Webster, 17-26. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
5. Becher, T. 1989. Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
6. Becher, T., and P.R. Trowler. 2001. Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines, 2nd ed. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
7. Bernstein, B. 2000. Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique, 2nd ed. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
8. Biglan, A. 1973. Relationships between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments. Journal of Applied Psychology 57, no. 3: 204-13.
9. Clark, B.R. 1987. The academic life: Small worlds, different worlds. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
10. Cownie, F. 2004. Legal academics: Culture and identities. Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart Publishing.
11. Donald, J. 1995. Disciplinary differences in knowledge validation. In Disciplinary differences in teaching and learning: Implications for practice, eds. N. Hativa and M. Marincovich, 7-17. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
12. Donald, J. 2002. Learning to think: Disciplinary perspectives. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
13. Donald, J. 2008. The commons: Disciplinary and interdisciplinary encounters. In The university and its disciplines: Teaching and learning within and beyond disciplinary boundaries, ed. C. Kreber, 35-49. New York and Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
14. Durkheim, E. 1977. The evolution of educational thought: Lectures on the formation and development of secondary education in France. London: Routledge and Paul Kegan.
15. Engeström, Y. 1987. Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit.
16. Fanghanel, J. 2009. Pedagogical constructs: Socio-cultural conceptions of teaching and learning in higher education. Saarbrü cken: VDM Verlag.
17. Giddens, A. 1984. The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
18. Halsey, A.H. 1982. The decline of donnish dominion? Oxford Review of Education 8, no. 3: 215-29.
19. Henkel, M. 2000. Academic identities and policy change in higher education. London: Jessica Kingsley.
20. Kuhn, T.S. 1970. The structure of scientific revolutions, 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
21. Muller, J. 2009. Forms of knowledge and curriculum coherence. Journal of Education and Work 22, no. 3: 205-26.
22. Neumann, R., S. Parry, and T. Becher. 2002. Teaching and learning in their disciplinary contexts: A conceptual analysis. Studies in Higher Education 27, no. 4: 405-17.
23. Saunders, M. 2000. Understanding education and work: Themes and issues. In Routledge international companion to education, eds. B. Moon, M. Pereetz and S. Brown, 683-704. London and New York: Routledge.
24. Saunders, M., and J. Machell. 2000. Understanding emerging trends in higher education curricula and work connections. Higher Education Policy 13: 287-302.
25. Shulman, L.S. 2005. Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus 134, no. 3: 52-9.
26. Trowler, P.R. 1998. Academics responding to change: New higher education frameworks and academic cultures. Buckingham: Society for Research in Higher Education and Open University Press.
27. Trowler, P.R. 2008. Culture and change in higher education: Theories and practices. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
28. Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Young, M.F.D. 2000. Rescuing the sociology of educational knowledge from the extremes of voice discourse: Towards a new theoretical basis for the sociology of the curriculum. British Journal of Sociology of Education 21, no. 4: 523-36.
30. Young, M.F.D. 2008. Bringing knowledge back. In From social constructivism to social realism in the sociology of education. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.