Improving patient opinion mining through multi-step classification

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 5729 LNAI, Issue , 2009, Pages 70-76

  Xia, Lei ^a   Gentile, Anna Lisa ^b   Munro, James ^c   Iria, José ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BARI   (Italy)

^c Patient Opinion ^*  (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATICALLY TRACKING; CLASSIFICATION ACCURACY; CLASSIFICATION MODELS; DATA SETS; FEATURE SETS; LEARNING MODELS; MULTI-STEP; MULTI-STEP CLASSIFICATION; OPINION MINING; POLARITY CLASSIFICATION; REAL-WORLD; SINGLE-STEP; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TEXT SNIPPETS; TRAINING MATERIAL;

CLASSIFIERS; LABELS; LEARNING SYSTEMS;

TEXT PROCESSING;

EID: 70349865196     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-04208-9_13     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Gindl, S., Liegl, J.: Evaluation of different sentiment detection methods for polarity classi- fication on web-based reviews. In: Proceedings of the18th European Conference on Artifi- cial Intelligence (ECAI 2008), ECAI Workshop on Computational Aspects of Affectual and Emotional Interaction, Patras, Greece (2008)
2. Abbasi, A., Chen, H., Salem, A.: Sentiment analysis in multiple languages: Feature selection for opinion classification in web forums. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 26(3) (2008)
3. Boiy, E., Hens, P., Deschacht, K., Moens, M.: Automatic sentiment analysis in on-line text. In: Chan, L., Martens, B. (eds.) ELPUB, pp. 349-360 (2007)
4. Gamon, M.: Sentiment classification on customer feedback data: noisy data, large feature vectors, and the role of linguistic analysis. In: COLING 2004: Proceedings of the 20th international conference on Computational Linguistics, Morristown, NJ, USA, p. 841. Association for Computational Linguistics (2004)
5. Niu, Y., Zhu, X., Li, J., Hirst, G.: Analysis of polarity information in medical text. In: AMIA Annu. Symp. Proc., pp. 570-574 (2005)
6. Pang, B., Lee, L., Vaithyanathan, S.: Thumbs up? Sentiment classification using machine learning techniques. In: Proceedings of the 2002 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pp. 79-86 (2002)
7. Hatzivassiloglou, V., McKeown, K.: Predicting the semantic orientation of adjectives. In: Proceedings of the eighth conference on European chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Morristown, NJ, USA, pp. 174-181. Association for Computational Linguistics (1997)
8. Koller, D., Sahami, M.: Hierarchically classifying documents using very few words. In: Fisher, D. (ed.) ICML, pp. 170-178. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1997)
9. Dumais, S., Chen, H.: Hierarchical classification of web content. In: SIGIR, pp. 256-263 (2000)
10. Pang, B., Lee, L.: A sentimental education: Sentiment analysis using subjectivity summarization based on minimum cuts. In: Proceedings of the ACL, pp. 271-278 (2004)
11. Niu, Y., Zhu, X., Hirst, G.: Using outcome polarity in sentence extraction for medical question-answering. In: AMIA Annu. Symp. Proc., pp. 599-603 (2006)
12. Esuli, A., Sebastiani, F.: Sentiwordnet: A publicly available lexical resource for opinion mining. In: Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2006), pp. 417-422 (2006)
13. Efron, M.: Cultural orientation: Classifying subjective documents by cocitation analysis. In: Proceedings of the 2004 AAAI Fall Symposium on Style and Meaning in Language, Art, Music, and Design, pp. 41-48 (2004)
14. Agrawal, R., Rajagopalan, S., Srikant, R., Xu, Y.: Mining newsgroups using networks arising from social behavior. In: WWW 2003: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on World Wide Web, pp. 529-535. ACM, New York (2003)
15. Yu, H., V.H.: Towards answering opinion questions: Separating facts from opinions and identifying the polarity of opinion sentences. In: Proceedings of the 2003 conference on Empirical methods in natural language processing, Morristown, NJ, USA, pp. 129-136. Association for Computational Linguistics (2003)
16. Mccallum, A., Nigam, K.: A comparison of event models for naive bayes text classification. In: AAAI Workshop on Learning for Text Categorization (1998)