The diversity and evolution of batesian mimicry in papilio swallowtail butterflies

Evolution

Volumn 63, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 2707-2716

  Kunte, Krushnamegh ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Character state path network; Microevolution; Polymorphism; Speciational evolution

Indexed keywords

BUTTERFLY; CLADISTICS; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ANALYSIS; MIMICRY; NUMERICAL MODEL; PHYLOGENY; POLYMORPHISM; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY);

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BUTTERFLY; CLASSIFICATION; EVOLUTION; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENETICS; HUMAN; PHYLOGENY; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ANIMALS; BUTTERFLIES; EVOLUTION; HUMANS; PHYLOGENY; POLYMORPHISM, GENETIC; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

PAPILIO; PAPILIONIDAE;

EID: 70349863286     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00752.x     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Alroy, J. 1998. Cope's rule and the dynamics of body mass evolution in North American fossil mammals. Science 280 : 731 734.
2. Amundsen, T. 2000. Why are female birds ornamented? Trends Ecol. Evol. 15 : 149 155.
3. Anonymous. 2009. HOSTS - a Database of the World's Lepidopteran Hostplants. Natural History Museum, London http://www.nhm.ac.uk/jdsml/research- curation/research/projects/hostplants/index.dsml Accessed May 2009.
4. Badyaev, A. V. 2005. Maternal inheritance and rapid evolution of sexual size dimorphism: passive effects or active strategies? Am. Nat. 166 : S17 S30.
5. Bates, H. W. 1862. Contributions to an insect fauna of the Amazon Valley (Lepidoptera: Heliconidae). Trans. Linn. Soc., Lond. 23 : 495 556.
6. Brower, J. V. Z. 1957. Experimental studies of mimicry in some North American butterflies. Nature 180 : 444.
7. Brower, J. V. Z. 1958. Experimental studies of mimicry in some North American butterflies: Part II. Battus philenor and Papilio troilus, P. polyxenes and P. glaucus. Evolution 12 : 123 136.
8. Ceccarelli, F. S., and R. H. Crozier. 2007. Dynamics of the evolution of Batesian mimicry: molecular phylogenetic analysis of ant-mimicking Myrmarachne (Araneae: Salticidae) species and their ant models. J. Evol. Biol. 20 : 286 295.
9. Chai, P. 1990. Relationships between visual characteristics of rainforest butterflies and responses of a specialized insectivorous bird. Pp. 31 60 in M. Wicksten, ed. Adaptive coloration in invertebrates. Texas A and M University Sea Grant Program (TAMU-SG-90106).
10. Chenoweth, S., H. Rundle, and M. Blows. 2008. Genetic constraints and the evolution of display trait sexual dimorphism by natural and sexual selection. Am. Nat. 171 : 22 34.
11. Clark, R., S. M. Brown, S. C. Collins, C. D. Jiggins, D. G. Heckel, and A. P. Vogler. 2008. Colour pattern specification in the mocker swallowtail Papilio dardanus: the transcription factor invected is a candidate for the mimicry locus H. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 275 : 1181 1188.
12. Clauset, A., and D. H. Erwin. 2008. The evolution and distribution of species body size. Science 321 : 399 401.
13. Codella, S. G., Jr., and R. C. Lederhouse. 1989. Intersexual comparison of mimetic protection in the black swallowtail butterfly, Papilio polyxenes: experiments with captive blue jay predators. Evolution 43 : 410 420.
14. Edmunds, M. 1974. Defence in animals. Longman, London.
15. Eltringham, H. 1910. African mimetic butterflies. Clarendon Press, Oxford. U.K.
16. Fisher, R. A. 1958. The genetical theory of natural selection. 2nd ed. Dover Publications, New York.
17. Flanagan, N. S., A. Tobler, A. Davison, O. G. Pybus, D. D. Kapan, S. Planas, M. Linares, D. Heckel, and W. O. McMillan. 2004. Historical demography of Müllerian mimicry in the neotropical Heliconius butterflies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101 : 9704 9709.
18. Ford, E. B. 1965. Genetic polymorphism. Faber and Faber, London.
19. Häuser, C. L., R. de Jong, G. Lamas, R. K. Robbins, C. Smith, and R. I. Vane-Wright. 2005. Papilionidae - revised GloBIS/GART species checklist (2nd draft) http://www.insects-online.de/frames/papilio.htm Accessed 2008.
20. Jiggins, C. D., R. Mallarino, K. R. Willmott, and E. Bermingham. 2006. The phylogenetic pattern of speciation and wing pattern change in Neotropical Ithomia butterflies (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Evolution 60 : 1454 1466.
21. Joron, M., R. Papa, M. Beltran, N. Chamberlain, J. Mavarez, S. Baxter, M. Abanto, E. Bermingham, S. J. Humphray, J. Rogers et al. 2006. A conserved supergene locus controls colour pattern diversity in Heliconius butterflies. PLoS Biol. 4 : e303.
22. Koch, P. B., B. Behnecke, and R. H. Ffrench-Constant. 2000. The molecular basis of melanism and mimicry in a swallowtail butterfly. Curr. Biol. 10 : 591 594.
23. Kunte, K. 2008. Mimetic butterflies support Wallace's model of sexual dimorphism. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 275 : 1617 1624.
24. Lande, R. 1980. Sexual dimorphism, sexual selection, and adaptation in polygenic characters. Evolution 34 : 292 305.
25. Maddison, W. P., and D. R. Maddison. 2006. Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis, version 1.12.
26. Mallet, J. 2004. Poulton, Wallace and Jordan: how discoveries in Papilio butterflies led to a new species concept 100 years ago. Syst. Biodiv. 1 : 441 452.
27. Marsh, N. A., C. A. Clarke, M. Rothschild, and D. N. Kellett. 1977. Hypolimnas bolina (L.), a mimic of danaid butterflies, and its model Euploea core (Cram.) store cardioactive substances. Nature 268 : 726 728.
28. Mullen, S. P., E. B. Dopman, and R. G. Harrison. 2008. Hybrid zone origins, species boundaries, and the evolution of wing-pattern diversity in a polytypic species complex of North American admiral butterflies (Nymphalidae: Limenitis). Evolution 62 : 1400 1417.
29. Pfennig, D., W. R. Harcombe, and K. S. Pfennig. 2001. Frequency-dependent Batesian mimicry. Nature 410 : 323.
30. Pfennig, D., G. Harper, A. Brumo, W. Harcombe, and K. Pfennig. 2007. Population differences in predation on Batesian mimics in allopatry with their model: selection against mimics is strongest when they are common. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 61 : 505 511.
31. Prudic, K. L., and J. C. Oliver. 2008. Once a Batesian mimic, not always a Batesian mimic: mimic reverts back to ancestral phenotype when the model is absent. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 275 : 1125 1132.
32. Prudic, K. L., J. C. Oliver, and F. A. H. Sperling. 2007. The signal environment is more important than diet or chemical specialization in the evolution of warning coloration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA 104 : 19381 19386.
33. Rettenmeyer, C. W. 1970. Insect mimicry. Ann. Rev. Ent. 15 : 43 74.
34. Ries, L., and S. P. Mullen. 2008. A rare model limits the distribution of its more common mimic: a twist on frequency-dependent Batesian mimicry. Evolution 62 : 1798 1803.
35. Ritland, D. B., and L. P. Brower. 1991. The viceroy butterfly is not a batesian mimic. Nature 350 : 497 498.
36. Ruxton, G. D., T. N. Sherratt, and M. P. Speed. 2004. Avoiding attack: the evolutionary ecology of crypsis, warning signals and mimicry. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
37. Savage, W. K., and S. P. Mullen. 2009. A single origin of Batesian mimicry among hybridizing populations of admiral butterflies (Limenitis arthemis) rejects an evolutionary reversion to the ancestral phenotype. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B doi : 10.1098/rspb.2009.0256.
38. Scriber, J. M., Y. Tsubaki, and R. C. Lederhouse, eds. 1995. Swallowtail butterflies: their ecology and evolutionary biology. Scientific Publishers, Inc., Gainesville, Florida.
39. Sheppard, P. M. 1975. Natural selection and heredity. 4th ed. Hutchinson and Co., London.
40. Striedter, G. F. 2005. Principles of brain evolution. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA.
41. Turner, J. R. G. 1978. Why male butterflies are non-mimetic: natural selection, sexual selection, group selection, modification and sieving. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 10 : 385 432.
42. Tyler, H., K. S. Brown, Jr., and K. Wilson. 1994. Swallowtail butterflies of the Americas. Scientific Publishers, Gainesville, USA.
43. Uesugi, K. 1995. Mimicry in Papilio polytes and its ecological meaning. Pp. 165 172 in J. M. Scriber, Y. Tsubaki, and R. C. Lederhouse, eds. Swallowtail butterflies: their ecology and evolutionary biology. Scientific Publishers, Gainesville, Florida.
44. Vane-Wright, R. I. 1971. The systematics of Drusillopsis Oberthür (Satyrinae) and the supposed Amathusiid Bigaena van Eecke (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae), with some observations on Batesian mimicry. Trans. R. Ent. Soc., Lond. 123 : 97 123.
45. Vane-Wright, R. I. 1979. Towards a theory of the evolution of butterfly colour patterns under directional and disruptive selection. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 11 : 141 152.
46. Vane-Wright, R. I., D. C. Raheem, A. Cieslak, and A. P. Vogler. 1999. Evolution of the mimetic African swallowtail butterfly Papilio dardanus: molecular data confirm relationships with P. phorcas and P. constantinus. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 66 : 215 229.
47. Wallace, A. R. 1865. On the phenomena of variation and geographical distribution as illustrated by the Papilionidae of the Malayan Region. Trans. Linn. Soc., Lond. 25 : 1 71.
48. Wallace, A. R. 1889. Darwinism: an exposition of the theory of natural selection with some of its applications. 2nd ed. MacMillan, London.
49. Wickler, W. 1968. Mimicry in plants and animals. World University Library, London.
50. Wynter-Blyth, M. A. 1957. Butterflies of the Indian Region. Bombay Natural History Society, Mumbai.
51. Zakharov, E. V., M. S. Caterino, and F. A. H. Sperling. 2004. Molecular phylogeny, historical biogeography, and divergence time estimates for Swallowtail Butterflies of the genus Papilio (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). Syst. Biol. 53 : 193 215.