Sperm competition and reproductive mode influence sperm dimensions and structure among snakes

Evolution

Volumn 63, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 2513-2524

  Tourmente, Maximiliano ^a,b   Gomendio, Montserrat ^c   Roldan, Eduardo R S ^c,d   Giojalas, Laura C ^a,b   Chiaraviglio, Margarita ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CÓRDOBA   (Argentina)

^b Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto M Lillo   (Argentina)

^c MUSEO NACIONAL DE CIENCIAS NATURALES   (Spain)

^d ROYAL VETERINARY COLLEGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Mating systems; Reproductive strategies; Selection sexual; Snakes; Sperm competition; Sperm structure

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENCOUNTER RATE; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; SEXUAL SELECTION; SIZE; SNAKE; SPERM COMPETITION;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BODY WEIGHT; CLASSIFICATION; CYTOLOGY; MALE; ORGAN SIZE; PHYLOGENY; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCTION; SNAKE; SPERMATOZOON; TESTIS;

ANIMALS; BODY WEIGHT; MALE; ORGAN SIZE; PHYLOGENY; REPRODUCTION; SNAKES; SPERMATOZOA; TESTIS;

SERPENTES;

EID: 70349850952     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00739.x     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Aldridge, R. D., and W. S. Brown. 1995. Male reproductive cycle, age at maturity, and cost of reproduction in the timber rattlesnake (Crotalus horridus). J. Herpetol. 29 : 399 407.
2. Aldridge, R. D., and D. Duvall. 2002. Evolution of the mating season in the pitvipers of North America. Herpetological Monographs 16 : 1 25.
3. Anderson, M. J., and A. F. Dixson. 2002. Sperm competition: motility and the midpiece in primates. Nature 416 : 496.
4. Anderson, M. J., J. Nyholt, and A. F. Dixson. 2005. Sperm competition and the evolution of sperm midpiece volume in mammals. J. Zool. 267 : 135 145.
5. Anderson, M. J., A. S. Dixson, and A. F. Dixson. 2006. Mammalian sperm and oviducts are sexually selected: evidence for co-evolution. J. Zool. 270 : 682 686.
6. Balshine, S., B. J. Leach, F. Neat, N. Y. Werner, and R. Montgomerie. 2001. Sperm size of African cichlids in relation to sperm competition. Behav. Ecol. 12 : 726 731.
7. Bertona, M., and M. Chiaraviglio. 2003. Reproductive biology, mating aggregations, and sexual dimorphism of the argentine boa constrictor (Boa constrictor occidentalis). J. Herpetol. 37 : 510 516.
8. Birkhead, T. R., J. G. Martinez, T. Burke, and D. P. Froman. 1999. Sperm mobility determines the outcome of sperm competition in the domestic fowl. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 266 : 1759 1764.
9. Bonnet, X., G. Naulleau, and R. Shine. 1999. The dangers of leaving home: dispersal and mortality in snakes. Biol. Conserv. 89 : 39 50.
10. Briskie, J. V., and R. Montgomerie. 1992. Sperm size and sperm competition in birds. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 247 : 89 95.
11. Briskie, J. V., R. Montgomerie, and T. R. Birkhead. 1997. The evolution of sperm size in birds. Evolution 51 : 937 945.
12. Brown, G. P., and R. Shine. 2002. Reproductive ecology of a tropical natricine snake, Tropidonophis mairii (Colubridae). J. Zool. 258 : 63 72.
13. Byrne, P. G., J. D. Roberts, and L. W. Simmons. 2002. Sperm competition selects for increased testes mass in Australian frogs. J. Evol. Biol. 15 : 347 355.
14. Byrne, P. G., L. W. Simmons, and R. J. Dale. 2003. Sperm competition and the evolution of gamete morphology in frogs. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 270 : 2079 2086.
15. Cardozo, G., P. C. Rivera, M. Lanfri, M. Scavuzzo, C. N. Gardenal, and M. Chiaraviglio. 2007. Effects of habitat loss on the genetic structure of populations of the Argentine boa constrictor (Boa constrictor occidentalis). Pp. 328 339 in R. W. Henderson and R. Powell, eds. Biology of the Boas and Pythons. Eagle Mountain Publishing, Eagle Mountain, Utah.
16. Carpenter, J. W., T. Y. Mashima, and D. J. Rupiper. 2001. Exotic Animal Formulary. Saunders Co., Philadelphia, PA.
17. Chiaraviglio, M. 2006. The effects of reproductive condition on thermoregulation in the Argentina boa constrictor (Boa constrictor occidentalis) (Boidae). Herpetological Monographs 20 : 172 177.
18. Chiaraviglio, M., and M. Bertona. 2007. Reproduction and thermoregulation are principal factors that influence habitat selection in the Argentine boa constrictor (Boa constrictor occidentalis). Pp. 76 87 in R. W. Henderson and R. Powell, eds. Biology of the Boas and Pythons. Eagle Mountain Publishing, Eagle Mountain, Utah.
19. Clark, A. G., D. J. Begun, and T. Prout. 1999. Female x male interactions in Drosophila sperm competition. Science 283 : 217 220.
20. Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
21. Cook, P. A., and M. J. G. Gage. 1995. Effects of risks of sperm competition on the numbers of eupyrene and apyrene sperm ejaculated by the moth Plodia interpunctella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 36 : 261 268.
22. Duvall, D., S. J. Arnold, and G. W. Schuett. 1992. Pitviper mating systems: Ecological potential, sexual selection and microevolution. Pp. 321 336 in J. A. Campbell and E. D. Brodie Jr., eds. Biology of the Pitvipers. Selva Press, Tyler, TX.
23. Eddy, E. M. 2007. The scaffold role of the fibrous sheath. Pp. 45 62 in E. R. S. Roldan and M. Gomendio, eds. Spermatology. Nottingham Univ. Press, Nottingham, U.K.
24. Eddy, E. M., and D. A. O'Brien 1994. The spermatozoon. Pp. 29 77 in E. Knobil and J. D. Neil, eds. The physiology of reproduction. Raven Press, New York.
25. Eddy, E. M., K. Toshimori, and D. A. O'Brien. 2003. Fibrous sheath of mammalian spermatozoa. Microsc. Res. Tech. 61 : 103 115.
26. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125 : 1 15.
27. Fitzpatrick, J. L., R. Montgomerie, J. K. Desjardins, K. A. Stiver, N. Kolm, and S. Balshine. 2009. Female promiscuity promotes the evolution of faster sperm in cichlid fishes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106 : 1128 1132.
28. Freckleton, R., P. H. Harvey, and M. D. Pagel. 2002. Phylogenetic analysis and comparative data: a test and review of evidence. Am. Nat. 160 : 712 726.
29. Froman, D. P., T. Pizzari, A. J. Feltmann, H. Castillo, and T. R. Birkhead. 2002. Sperm mobility: mechanisms of fertilizing efficiency, genetic variation and phenotypic relationship with male status in the domestic fowl, Gallus gallus domesticus. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 269 : 607 612.
30. Gage, M. J. G. 1994. Associations between body size, mating pattern, testis size and sperm lengths across butterflies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 258 : 247 254.
31. Gage, M. J. G., C. P. Macfarlane, S. Yeates, R. G. Ward, J. B. Searle, and G. A. Parker. 2004. Spermatozoal traits and sperm competition in atlantic salmon: relative sperm velocity is the primary determinant of fertilization success. Curr. Biol. 14 : 44 47.
32. Gomendio, M., and E. R. S. Roldan. 1991. Sperm competition influences sperm size in mammals. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 243 : 181 185.
33. Gomendio, M., and E. R. S. Roldan 1993. Coevolution between male ejaculates and female reproductive biology in eutherian mammals. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 252 : 7 12.
34. Gomendio, M., and E. R. S. Roldan 2008. Implications of diversity in sperm size and function for sperm competition and fertility. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 52 : 439 447.
35. Gomendio, M., A. H. Harcourt, and E. R. S. Roldan. 1998. Sperm competition in mammals. Pp. 667 756 in T. R. Birkhead and A. P. Moller, eds. Sperm competition and sexual selection. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
36. Gomendio, M., J. Martin-Coello, C. Crespo, C. Magaña, and E. R. S. Roldan. 2006. Sperm competition enhances functional capacity of mammalian spermatozoa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103 : 15113 15117.
37. Harvey, P. H., and M. D. Pagel. 1991. The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
38. Holman, L., R. Freckleton, and R. R. Snook. 2008. What use is an infertile sperm? A comparative study of sperm-heteromorphic Drosophila. Evolution 62 : 374 385.
39. Hosken, D. J. 1997. Sperm competition in bats. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 264 : 385 392.
40. Hunter, F. M., and T. R. Birkhead. 2002. Sperm viability and sperm competition in insects. Curr. Biol. 12 : 121 123.
41. Immler, S., and T. R. Birkhead. 2007. Sperm competition and sperm midpiece size: no consistent pattern in passerine birds. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 274 : 561 568.
42. Immler, S., M. Saint-Jalme, L. Lesobre, G. Sorci, Y. Roman, and T. R. Birkhead. 2007. The evolution of sperm morphometry in pheasants. J. Evol. Biol. 20 : 1008 1014.
43. Jamieson, B. G. M. 1999. Spermatozoal phylogeny of the vetebrata. Pp. 303 331 in C. Glagnon, ed. The male gamete: from basic science to clinical applications. Cache River Press, Vienna, IL.
44. Jennions, M. D., and N. I. Passmore. 1993. Sperm competition in frogs: testis size and "sterile male" experiment on Chiromantis xerampelina (Rhacophoridae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. Lond. 50 : 211 220.
45. Johnson, D. P., and J. V. Briskie. 1999. Sperm competition and sperm length in shorebirds. Condor 101 : 848 854.
46. LaMunyon, C. W., and S. Ward. 1998. Larger sperm outcompete smaller sperm in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 265 : 1997 2002.
47. LaMunyon, C. W., and S. Ward. 1999. Evolution of sperm size in nematodes: sperm competition favours larger sperm. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 266 : 263 267.
48. LaMunyon, C. W., and S. Ward. 2002. Evolution of larger sperm in response to experimentally increased sperm competition in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 269 : 1125 1128.
49. Lüpold, S., G. M. Linz, J. W. Rivers, D. F. Westneat, and T. R. Birkhead. 2008. Sperm competition selects beyond relative testes size in birds. Evolution 63 : 391 402.
50. Lüpold, S., S. Calhim, S. Immler, and T. R. Birkhead. 2009. Sperm morphology and sperm velocity in passerine birds. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 276 : 1175 1181.
51. Mader, D. R. 2005. Reptile Medicine and Surgery. Saunders, Philadelphia, PA.
52. Madsen, T., and R. Shine. 2000. Energy versus risk: costs of reproduction in free-ranging pythons in tropical Australia. Aust. Ecol. 25 : 670 675.
53. Madsen, T., R. Shine, J. Loman, and T. Hakansson. 1992. Why do female adders copulate so frequently? Nature 355 : 440 441.
54. Malo, A. F., M. Gomendio, J. Garde, B. Lang-Lenton, A. J. Soler, and E. R. S. Roldan. 2006. Sperm design and sperm function. Biol. Lett. 2 : 246 249.
55. Martins, M., O. A. V. Marques, and I. Sazima. 2002. Ecological and phylogenetic correlates of feeding habits in Neotropical Pitvipers of the genus Bothrops. Pp. 307 328 in G. W. Schuett, M. Hoggren, M. E. Douglas, and H. W. Greene, eds. Biology of the Vipers. Eagle Mountain Publishing, Eagle Mountain, Utah.
56. Méndez, F. R., and M. Villagrán. 1998. Reproducción asincrónica de Sceloporus palaciosi (Sauria: Phrynosomatidae) en México, con comentarios sobre sus ventajas y regulación. Rev. Biol. Trop. 46 : 1159 1161.
57. Miki, K., W. Willis, P. Brown, E. Goulding, K. Fulcher, and E. M. Eddy. 2002. Targeted disruption of the AKAP4 gene causes defects in sperm flagellum and motility. Dev. Biol. 248 : 331 342.
58. Miki, K., W. Qu, E. H. Goulding, W. D. Willis, D. O. Bunch, L. F. Strader, S. D. Perreault, E. M. Eddy, and D. A. O'Brien. 2004. Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase-S, a sperm-specific glycolytic enzyme, is required for sperm motility and male fertility. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101 : 16501 16506.
59. Miller, G. T., and S. Pitnick. 2002. Sperm-Female Coevolution in Drosophila. Science 298 : 1230 1233.
60. Minder, A. M., D. J. Hosken, and P. I. Ward. 2005. Co-evolution of male and female reproductive characters across the Scatophagidae (Diptera). J. Evol. Biol. 18 : 60 69.
61. Morrow, E. H., and M. J. G. Gage. 2000. The evolution of sperm length in moths. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 267 : 307 313.
62. Nagakawa, S. 2004. A farewell to Bonferroni: the problems of low statistical power and publication bias. Behav. Ecol. 15 : 1044 1045.
63. Narisawa, S., N. B. Hecht, E. Goldberg, K. M. Boatright, J. C. Reed, and J. L. Millan. 2002. Testis-specific cytochrome c-null mice produce functional sperm but undergo early testicular atrophy. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22 : 5554 5562.
64. Naulleau, G., and X. Bonnet. 1996. Body condition threshold for breeding in a viviparous snake. Oecologia 107 : 301 306.
65. Oliver, S. C., B. G. M. Jamieson, and D. M. Scheltinga. 1996. The ultrastructure of spermatozoa of Squamata. II. Agamidae, Varanidae, Colubridae, Elapidae, and Boidae (Reptilia). Herpetologica 52 : 216 241.
66. Olsson, M., and T. Madsen. 1998. Sexual selection and sperm competition in reptiles. Pp. 503 578 in T. R. Birkhead and A. P. Moller, eds. Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
67. Olsson, M., T. Madsen, and R. Shine. 1997. Is sperm really so cheap? Costs of reproduction in male adders, Vipera berus. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 264 : 455 459.
68. Parker, G. A. 1998. Sperm competition and the evolution of ejaculates: towards a theory base. Pp. 3 54 in T. R. Birkhead and A. P. Moller, eds. Sperm competition and sexual selection. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
69. Pitnick, S., G. T. Miller, M. Schneider, and T. A. Markow. 2003. Ejaculate-female coevolution in Drosophila mojavensis. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 270 : 1507 1512.
70. Presgraves, D. C., R. H. Baker, and G. S. Wilkinson. 1999. Coevolution of sperm and female reproductive tract morphology in stalk-eyed flies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 266 : 1041 1047.
71. Radwan, J. 1996. Intraspecific variation in sperm competition success in the bulb mite: a role for sperm size. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 263 : 855 859.
72. Rivera, P. C., C. N. Gardenal, and M. Chiaraviglio. 2006. Sex-biased dispersal and high levels of gene flow among local populations in the argentine boa constrictor, Boa constrictor occidentalis. Aust. Ecol. 31 : 948 955.
73. Roldan, E. R. S., M. Gomendio, and A. D. Vitullo. 1992. The evolution of euhterian spermatozoa and underlying selective forces: female selection and sperm competition. Biol. Rev. 67 : 551 593.
74. Rosenthal, R. 1991. Meta-analytic procedures for social research. SAGE Publications, Newbury Park, CA.
75. Rosenthal, R. 1994. Parametric measures of effect size. Pp. 231 244 in H. Cooper and L. Hedges, eds. The handbook of research synthesis. SAGE Publications, New York, NY.
76. Rosnow, R., and R. Rosenthal. 2003. Effect sizes for experimenting psychologists. Can. J. Exp. Psychol. 57 : 221 237.
77. Scrocchi, G. J., I. Agüero, V. Arzamendia, P. Cacivio, H. Carcacha, M. Chiaraviglio, A. Giraudo, S. Kretzschmar, G. Leynaud, M. S. López, et al. 2000. Categorización de las serpientes de Argentina. Pp. 76 93 in E. O. Lavilla, E. Richard, and G. Scrocchi, eds. Categorizacion de los anfibios y reptiles de la República Argentina. Asociación Herpetológica Argentina, San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentina.
78. Sever, D. M., and W. C. Hamlett. 2002. Female sperm storage in reptiles. J. Exp. Zoolog. 292 : 187 199.
79. Shine, R. 1988. The evolution of large body size in females: a critique of Darwin's "fecundity advantage" model. Am. Nat. 131 : 124 131.
80. Shine, R. 2003. Reproductive strategies in snakes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 270 : 995 1004.
81. Shine, R., and T. Madsen. 1997. Prey abundance and predator reproduction: rats and pythons on a tropical Australian floodplain. Ecology 78 : 1078 1086.
82. Slowinski, J. B., and R. Lawson. 2002. Snake phylogeny: evidence from nuclear and mitochondrial genes. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 24 : 194 202.
83. Smithson, M. 2003. Confidence intervals. SAGE Publications, London, U.K.
84. Snook, R. R. 2005. Sperm in competition: not playing by the numbers. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20 : 46 53.
85. Stockley, P., M. J. G. Gage, G. A. Parker, and A. P. Møller. 1997. Sperm competition in fishes: the evolution of testis size and ejaculate characteristics. Am. Nat. 149 : 933 954.
86. Tomkins, J. L., and L. W. Simmons. 2002. Measuring relatie investment: a case study of testes investment in species with alternative male reproductive tactics. Anim. Behav. 63 : 1009 1016.
87. Tourmente, M., G. Cardozo, M. Bertona, A. Guidobaldi, L. Giojalas, and M. Chiaraviglio. 2006. The ultrastructure of the spermatozoa of Boa constrictor occidentalis, with considerations on its mating system and sperm competition theories. Acta Zool. 87 : 25 32.
88. Tourmente, M., L. Giojalas, and M. Chiaraviglio. 2008. Sperm ultrastructure of Bothrops alternatus and Bothrops diporus (Viperidae, Serpentes), and its possible relation to the reproductive features of the species. Zoomorphology 127 : 241 248.
89. Turner, R. M. 2006. Moving to the beat: a review of mammalian sperm motility regulation. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 18 : 25 38.
90. Vidal, N., and S. B. Hedges. 2002. Higher-level relationships of snakes inferred from four nuclear and mitochondrial genes. C. R. Biol. 325 : 977 985. (Pubitemid 35422611)
91. Vidal, N., S. G. Kindl, A. Wong, and S. B. Hedges. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships of xenodontine snakes inferred from 12S and 16S ribosomal RNA sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 14 : 389 402.
92. Zaher, H. 1999. Hemipenial morphology of the South American xenodontine snakes: with a proposal for a monophyletic Xenodontinae and a reappraisal of colubroid hemipenes. Bulletin of the AMNH 240.
93. Zug, G. R., L. J. Vitt, and J. P. Caldwell. 2001. Herpetology: an introductory biology of amphibians and reptiles. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.