Objectives and methodology: Guidelines of the Italian Society for Haemostasis and Thrombosis (SISET)

Thrombosis Research

Volumn 124, Issue 5, 2009, Pages

  Iorio, Alfonso ^a   Ageno, Walter ^b   Cosmi, Benilde ^c   Imberti, Davide ^d   Lussana, Federico ^e   Siragusa, Sergio ^f   Tormene, Daniela ^g   Tosetto, Alberto ^h   Cattaneo, Marco ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PERUGIA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF INSUBRIA   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^d Provincia di Piacenza   (Italy)

^e SAN PAOLO HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^f UNIVERSITY OF PALERMO   (Italy)

^g UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^h SAN BORTOLO HOSPITAL   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DATA EXTRACTION; DECISION MAKING; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEMOSTASIS; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL SOCIETY; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION; PEER REVIEW; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THROMBOSIS;

EID: 70349849540     PISSN: 00493848     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2009.05.014     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Armstrong E.C. The well-built clinical question: the key to finding the best evidence efficiently. WMJ 98 (1999) 25-28
2. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. SIGN 50: A guideline developers' handbook. SIGN Publication No. 50. February 2001, last updated May 2004. Available from: http://www.sign.ac.uk.
3. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Guideline Development Methods: Information for National Collaborating Centres and Guideline Developers. London: National Institute for Clinical Excellence. February 2004, updated 2005. Available from: www.nice.org.
4. Guyatt G., Vist G., Falck-Ytter Y., Kunz R., Magrini N., Schunemann H., and for the GRADE working group. An emerging consensus on grading recommendations?. ACP J Club 144 (2006) A08
5. Guyatt G., Gutterman D., Baumann M., Addrizzo-Harris D., Hylek E.M., Phillips B., et al. Grading strength of recommendations and quality of evidence in clinical guidelines: report from an American college of chest physicians task force. Chest 129 (2006) 174-181
6. Baumann M.H., and Gutterman D.D. American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Guidelines-the Next Generation: Considering Resource Use and Evolution to a Single Grading System. Chest 129 (2006) 10-12
7. The GRADE working group. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 328 (2004) 1490-1494
8. The GRADE working group. Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations II: A pilot study of a new system for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations. BMC Health Serv Res 23 (2005) 5-25
9. Brook R.H., Chassin M.R., Fink A., Solomon D.H., Kosecoff J., and Park R.E. A method for the detailed assessment of the appropriateness of medical technologies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2 (1986) 53-63