American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based guidelines - The next generation: Considering resource use and evolution to a single grading system

Chest

Volumn 129, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 10-12

  Baumann, Michael H ^a,b,c   Gutterman, David D ^a,c,d,e  

^a University of Mississippi Medical School ^*

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c American College of Osteopathic Emergency Physicians   (United States)

^d MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN   (United States)

^e VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COST UTILITY ANALYSIS; EDITORIAL; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; THORAX DISEASE;

EID: 33144488246     PISSN: 00123692     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1378/chest.129.1.10     Document Type: Editorial

References (10)

1. American College of Chest Physicians. Health and Science Policy Committee. Available at: http://www.chestnet.org/ about/committees/hsp.php. Accessed September 17, 2005
2. Diagnosis and management of lung cancer: ACCP evidence-based guidelines. Chest 2003; 123(suppl):1-326
3. Diagnosis and management of pulmonary arterial hypertension: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 2004; 126(suppl):1-92
4. The Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy: evidence-based guidelines. Chest 2004; 126(suppl):1-703
5. Dolovich MB, Ahrens RC, Hess DR, et al. Device selection and outcomes of aerosol therapy, evidence-based guidelines; American College of Chest Physicians/American College of Asthma, Allergy, and Immunology. Chest 2005; 127:335-471
6. Hogue CW Jr, Creswell LL, Guterman DD, et al. Epidemiology, mechanisms, and risks: American College of Chest Physicians guidelines for the prevention and management of postoperative atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. Chest 2005; 128(suppl):9S-16S
7. Irwin RS. Diagnosis and management of cough: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 2006; 129(suppl):24
8. Atkins D, Best D, Briss P, et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2004; 328:1490-1497
9. Guyatt G, Gutterman D, Baumann MH, et al. Grading strength of recommendations and quality of evidence in clinical guidelines: report from an American College of Chest Physicians Task Force. Chest 2006; 129:174-187
10. Guyatt G, Baumann M, Pauker S, et al. Addressing resource allocation issues from clinical practice guideline panels: suggestions from an American College of Chest Physicians Task Force. Chest 2006; 129:182-187