New developments in technology management education: Background issues, program initiatives, and a research agenda

Academy of Management Learning and Education

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 324-336

  Phan, Phillip ^a   Siegel, Donald ^b   Wright, Mike ^c  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349832955     PISSN: 1537260X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5465/AMLE.2009.44287934     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Ambos, T., Makela, K., Birkinshaw, J., & D'Este, P. 2008. When does university research get commercialized? Creating ambidexterity in research institutions. Journal of Management Studies, 45: 1424-1447.
2. Becher, T., & Trowler, P. R. 2001. Academic tribes and territories. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
3. Carlile, R. P. 2002. A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science, 13: 442-455.
4. Inkpen, A., & Tsang, E. 2005. Social capital, networks and knowledge transfer. Academy of Management Review, 30(1): 146-165.
5. Koh, W., & Phan, P. In Press. The National Innovation System in Singapore. In V. K., Narayanan, & G. O'Connor, (Eds.), Encyclopedia for Technology, Innovation and Management, Blackwell Press: U.K.
6. Locke, R., & Schöne, K. 2004. The entrepreneurial shift: Americanization in European high-technology management education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Markman, G., Phan, P., Balkin, D., & Gianiodis, P. 2004. Entrepreneurship from the ivory tower: Do incentive systems matter? Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(3- 4): 353-364.
8. Markman, G., Siegel, D., & Wright, M. 2008. Research and technology commercialization. Journal of Management Studies, 45: 1401-1423.
9. Meyer, M. 2008. University patenting and IP management approaches in Europe. Brighton: SPRU, University of Sussex.
10. Muller-Camen, M., & Salzgeber, S. 2005. Changes in academic work and the chair regime: The case of German business administration academics. Organization Studies, 26(2): 271-290.
11. Mustar, P., & Wright, M. 2009. Convergence or path dependency in policies to foster the creation of university spin-off firms? A comparison of France and the United Kingdom. Journal of Technology Transfer, forthcoming.
12. Nambisan, S., & Willemon, D. 2003. A global study of graduate management of technology programmes. Technovation, 23: 949-962.
13. Pfeffer, J., & Fong, C. T. 2002. The end of business schools? Less success than meets the eye. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 1(1): 78-95.
14. Pfeffer, J., & Fong, C. T. 2004. The business school "business": Some lessons from the U.S. experience. Journal of Management Studies, 41(8): 1501-1520.
15. Phan, P., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. 2005. Science parks and incubators: Observations, synthesis and future research. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(2): 165-182.
16. Siegel, D. S., & Phan, P. 2005. Analyzing the effectiveness of university technology transfer: Implications for entrepreneurship education. In G. D. Libecap, (Ed.), Advances in the study of entrepreneurship, innovation, and economic growth, volume 16: University entrepreneurship and technology transfer: 1-38. JAI Press: Oxford, UK.
17. Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D., & Link, A. N. 2003. Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the productivity of university technology transfer offices: An exploratory study. Research Policy, 32(1): 27-48.
18. Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D., Atwater, L., & Link, A. N. 2004. Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: Qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 21(1-2): 115-142.
19. Siegel, D. S., & Wright M. 2007. Intellectual property: The assessment. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 23(4): 529-540.
20. Souitaris V., Zerbinati, S., & Al-Laham, A. 2007. Do entrepreneurship programmes raise entrepreneurial intentions of science and engineering students? The effects of learning, inspiration and resources. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(4): 566-591.
21. Starkey, K., Hatchuel, A., & Tempest, S. 2004. Rethinking the business school. Journal of Management Studies, 41(8): 1521-1532.
22. Suddaby, R., & Greenwood, R. 2001. Colonizing knowledge: Commodification as a dynamic of jurisdictional expansion in professional service firms. Human Relations, 54: 933-953. (Pubitemid 33581002)
23. Szulanski, G. 1996. Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 27-43.
24. Van Burg, E., Romme, G. L., Gilsing, V. A, & Reymenk, I. M. M. J. 2008. Creating university spin-offs: A science-based design perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25: 114-128.
25. Wright, M., Piva, E., Mosey, S., & Lockett, A. 2009. Academic entrepreneurship and the role of business schools. Journal of Technology Transfer.