E-learning: Trends and future development

Advances in Computer-Supported Learning

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 122-144

  Ertl, Bernhard ^a,b   Winkler, Katrin ^b   Mandl, Heinz ^b  

^a BUNDESWEHR UNIVERSITY MUNICH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349826143     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-355-5.ch006     Document Type: Chapter

References (39)

1. Alexander, D. L. (1985). Successfully implementing strategic decisions. Long Range Planning, 18(3), 91-97.
2. Altenburg, E., Arnold, G., & Schürmann, A. (2003). Stationenlernen im fächerübergreifenden Sachunterricht. Donauwörth: Auer.
3. Back, A., Seufert, S., & Kramhöller, S. (1998). Technology enabled management education. iomanagement, 21(3), 36-40.
4. Belanger, F., & Jordan, D. H. (2000). Evaluation and implementation of distance learning: Technologies, tools and techniques. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
5. Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Wozney, et al. (2004). How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 379-439.
6. Brehm, S. S., & Brehm, J. W. (1981). Psychological reactance-A theory of freedom and control. New York: Academic Press.
7. Bürg, O., Kronburger, K., & Mandl, H. (2004). Implementation von e-learning in unternehmen-Akzeptanzsicherung als zentrale Herausforderung (Forschungsbericht Nr. 170). München: Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Department Psychologie, Institut für Pädagogische Psychologie.
8. th Biennial Conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI), Nicosia, Cyprus.
9. Davies, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-339.
10. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1992). The initiation and regulation of intrinsically motivated learning and achievement. In A. K. Boggiano & T. S. Pittman (Eds.), Achievement and motivation: A social-developmental perspective (pp. 9-36). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Dochy, F., Segers, M., Van den Bossche, P., & Gijbels, D. (2003). Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 13(5), 533-568.
12. eLearningNews.net. (2005). Survey predicts transatlantic increase in blended learning. Retrieved September 8, 2005, from http://www.elearningnews.net/view_news.php?news_id=505
13. Erlach, C., Hausmann, I., Mandl, H., & Trillitzsch, U. (2002). Knowledge Master-A collaborative learning program for Knowledge Management. In T. H. Davenport & G. J. B. Probst (Eds.), Kowledge management case book. Siemens best practicesi (pp. 208-227). Erlangen: Publicis KommunikationsAgentur GWA.
14. Goodhue, D. L. (1995). Understanding user evaluations of information systems. Management Science, 41(12), 1827-1844.
15. Gratton, L. (1996). Implementing a strategic vision-Key factors for success. Long Range Planning, 29(3), 290-303.
16. Haben, M. (2002). E-learning in large German companies-Most of the concepts are not effective. Computerwoche, 30(22), 12-16.
17. Harhoff, D., & Küpper, C. (2002). Akzeptanz von E-Learning. Eine empirische Studie in Zusammenarbeit von Cognos und dem Institut für Innovationsforschung, Technologiemanagement und Entrepreneurship. München: INNOtec.
18. Hasenbein, M. (2003). Evaluation einer Webbasierten lernumgebung: Das lernmodul "Mediendidaktik" für lehramtsstudierende im aufbaustudie ngang medienpädagogik. Unpublished term paper, Ludwig-Maximilians- Universität, München.
19. Hinkofer, L., & Mandl, H. (2003). Implementation von e-learning in einem pharmaunternehmen (Praxisbericht Nr. 28). München: LudwigsMaximilians-Universität, Lehrstuhl für Empirische Pädagogik und Pädagogische Psychologie.
20. Kollar, I., & Fischer, F. (2004). Internal and external cooperation scripts in Web-based collaborative inquiry learning. Effects on the acquisition of domain-specific and general knowledge. In P. Gerjets, P. Kirschner, J. Elen, & R. Joiner (Eds.), Instructional design for effective and enjoyable computer-supported learning. Proceedings of the first joint meeting of the EARLI SIGs Instructional Design and Learning and Instruction with Computers [CD-ROM] (pp.37-47). Tuebingen: Knowledge Media Research Center.
21. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22. Learnframe.com. (2005). About e-learning. Retrieved September 8, 2005, from http://www.learnframe.com/aboutelearning/
23. Mandl, H., Ertl, B., & Kopp, B. (in press). Cooperative learning in computer supported learning environments. In L. Verschaffel, F. Dochy, M. Boekaerts, & S. Vosniadou (Eds.), Instructional psychology: Past, present and future trends. Fifteen Essays in Honor of Erik De Corte (pp. 165-182). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
24. th birthday of August Flammer. Mahwah, NY: Erlbaum.
25. Mandl, H., Gruber, H., & Renkl, A. (1996). Communities of practice toward expertise: Social foundation of university instruction. In P. B. Baltes & U. Staudinger (Eds.), Interactive minds. Life-span perspectives on the social foundation of cognition (pp. 394-411). New York: Cambridge University Press.
26. Mandl, H., & Winkler, K. (2004). E-Learning-Trends und zukünftige entwicklungen. In K. Rebensburg (Ed.), Grundfragen multimedialen lehrens und lernens (pp. 17-29). Norderstedt: Books on Demand.
27. th Conference of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), Montréal, Canada.
28. Raimond, P., & Eden, C. (1990). Making strategy work. Long Range Planning. International Journal of Strategic Management, 32(5), 97-105.
29. Reinmann-Rothmeier, G., & Mandl, H. (2001a). Unterrichten und lernumgebungen gestalten. In A. Krapp & B. Weidenmann (Eds.), Pädagogische Psychologie (pp. 601-646). Weinheim: Beltz.
30. Reinmann-Rothmeier, G., & Mandl, H. (2001b). Virtuelle seminare in hochschule und weiterbildung: Drei beispiele aus der praxis. Bern: Huber.
31. Renkl, A., Gruber, H., & Mandl, H. (1999). Situated learning in instructional settings: From euphoria to feasibility. In J. Bliss, R. Saljö, & P. Light (Eds.), Learning sites: Social and technological resources for learning (pp. 101-109). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
32. Renkl, A., Mandl, H., & Gruber, H. (1996). Inert knowledge: Analyses and remedies. Educational Psychologist, 31(2), 115-121.
33. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 265-283.
34. Scriven, M. (1980). The logic of evaluation. Iverness: Edgepress.
35. Sweller, J., Van Merrienboër, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251-296.
36. Tarlatt, A. (2001). Implementierung von strategien im unternehmen. Wiesbaden: Gabler.
37. Volery, T., & Lord, D. (2000). Critical success factors in online education. The International Journal of Educational Management, 14(5), 216-223.
38. Weinberger, A., Ertl, B., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Epistemic and social scripts in computer-supported collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 33(1), 1-30.
39. Zumbach, J., & Reimann, P. (2003). Influence of feedback on distributed problem based learning. Enhancing online communities in group functioning and well-being. In B. Wasson, S. Ludvigsen, & U. Hoppe (Eds.), Designing for change (pp. 219-228). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher.