Evaluating the adaptation of a learning system before the prototype is ready: A paper-based lab study

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 5535 LNCS, Issue , 2009, Pages 331-336

  Ley, Tobias ^a,b   Kump, Barbara ^c   Maas, Antonia ^b   Maiden, Neil ^d   Albert, Dietrich ^b  

^a KNOW CENTER   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRAZ   (Austria)

^c GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

^d CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Adaptive Learning Systems; Evaluation; Knowledge Space Theory; Learning Need Analysis; Task based Competency Assessment

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE LEARNING SYSTEMS; EVALUATION; KNOWLEDGE SPACE THEORY; LEARNING NEED ANALYSIS; TASK-BASED COMPETENCY ASSESSMENT;

ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS;

EDUCATION;

EID: 70349819805     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-02247-0_32     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Van Velsen, L., Van Der Geest, T., Klaassen, R., Steehouder, M.: User-centered evaluation of adaptive and adaptable systems: a literature review. The Knowledge Engineering Review 23(3), 261-281 (2008)
2. Brusilovsky, P., Karagiannidis, C., Sampson, D.: The Benefits of Layered Evaluation of Adaptive Applications and Services. In: Weibelzahl, S., Chin, D., Weber, G. (eds.) Empirical evaluation of adaptive systems. Workshop at the UM 2001, pp. 1-8 (2001)
3. Paramythis, A., Totter, A., Stephanidis, C.: A modular approach to the evaluation of adaptive user interfaces. In: Weibelzahl, S., Chin, D., Weber, G. (eds.) Empirical evaluation of adaptive systems: Workshop at the UM 2001, pp. 9-24 (2001)
4. Weibelzahl, S., Lauer, C.U.: Framework for the evaluation of adaptive CBR-systems. In: Vollrath, I., Schmitt, S., Reimer, U. (eds.) Experience Management as Reuse of Knowledge. GWCBR 2001, pp. 254-263. Baden-Baden, Germany (2001)
5. Lindstaedt, S.N., Ley, T., Scheir, P., Ulbrich, A.: Applying Scruffy Methods to Enable Work-integrated Learning. Upgrade: The European Journal of the Informatics Professional 9(3), 44-50 (2008)
6. Korossy, K.: Extending the theory of knowledge spaces: A competence-performance approach. Zeitschrift für Psychologie 205, 53-82 (1997)
7. Ley, T., Ulbrich, A., Scheir, P., Lindstaedt, S.N., Kump, B., Albert, D.: Modelling Competencies for supporting Work-integrated Learning in Knowledge Work. Journal of Knowledge Management 12(6), 31-47 (2008)
8. Maiden, N.A., Jones, S.V.: The RESCUE Requirements Engineering Process - An Integrated User-centered Requirements Engineering Process, Version 4.1. Centre for HCI Design, The City University, London/UK (2004)
9. Hoffman, C., Nathan, B., Holden, L.: A Comparison of Validation Criteria: Objective versus Subjective Performance Measures and Self- versus Supervisor Ratings. Personnel Psychology 44, 601-619 (1991)
10. Mabe, P., West, S.: Validity of Self-Evaluation of Ability: A Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology 67, 280-296 (1982)
11. Ley, T.: Organizational Competency Management - A Competence Performance Approach. Shaker, Aachen (2006)
12. Muellerbuchhof, R., Zehrt, P.: Vergleich subjektiver und objektiver Messverfahren für die Bestimmung von Methodenkompetenz am Beispiel der Kompetenzmessung bei technischem Fachpersonal. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie 48, 132-138 (2004)