Assessment of quality of life and participation within an outpatient rehabilitation setting

Disability and Rehabilitation

Volumn 31, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 906-913

  Ackerley, Suzanne J ^a,b   Gordon, Heather J ^a   Elston, Alison F ^a   Crawford, Lorna M ^a   McPherson, Kathryn M ^c  

^a AUCKLAND DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^c AUCKLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Outpatient; Participation; Quality of life; Rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CLINICAL PRACTICE; DISABILITY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTPATIENT; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; QUALITY OF LIFE; RATING SCALE; REHABILITATION MEDICINE; ADOLESCENT; AGED; MIDDLE AGED; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; QUESTIONNAIRE; REHABILITATION CENTER;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTPATIENTS; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REHABILITATION CENTERS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 70349781103     PISSN: 09638288     EISSN: 14645165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09638280802356419     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Stucki G. International classification of functioning, disability, and health (ICF): a promising framework and classification for rehabilitation medicine. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2005;84: 733-740. (Pubitemid 41416269)
2. World Health Organisation. Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health ICF. Internet. 2002. http:// www.who.int/classifications/ icf/site/beginners/bg.pdf
3. Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOLBREF quality of life assessment. The WHOQOL Group. Psychol Med 1998;28:551-558.
4. Mayo NE, Wood-Dauphinee S, Côté R, Durcan L, Carlton J. Activity, participation, and quality of life 6 months poststroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:1035-1042.
5. Taylor W, McPherson K. Measuring quality of life. Aust J Rehabil Couns 1999;5:69-77.
6. Tulsky DS, Rosenthal M. Quality of life measurement in rehabilitation medicine: building an agenda for the future. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83 (Suppl 2):S1-S3.
7. Cardol M, Brandsma JW, De Groot IJM, Van Den Bos GAM, De Jong BA. Handicap questionnaires: what do they assess? Disabil Rehabil 1999;21:97-105.
8. Cardol M, De Jong BA, Ward CD. On autonomy and participation in rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24:970- 974; discussion 975-1004.
9. Torenbeek M, Caulfield B, Garrett M, Van Harten W. Current use of outcome measures for stroke and low back pain rehabilitation in five European countries: first results of the ACROSS project. Int J Rehabil Res 2001;24:95-101.
10. Turner-Stokes L, Turner-Stokes T. The use of standardized outcome measures in rehabilitation centres in the UK. Clin Rehabil 1997;11:306-313.
11. WaDe DT. Measurement in neurological rehabilitation. Curr Opin Neurol Neurosurg 1992;5:682-686.
12. Panesar BS, Morrison P, Hunter J. A comparison of three measures of progress in early lower limb amputee rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil 2001;15:157-171.
13. Williams G, Robertson V, Greenwood K, Goldie P, Morris ME. The concurrent validity and responsiveness of the highlevel mobility assessment tool for measuring the mobility limitations of people with traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006;87:437-442.
14. Hunt SM, McKenna SP, McEwen J, Backett EM, Williams J, Papp E. A quantitative approach to perceived health status: a validation study. J Epidemiol Community Health 1980;34: 281-286.
15. Coons SJ, Rao S, Keininger DL, Hays RD. A comparative review of generic quality-of-life instruments. Pharmacoeconomics 2000;17:13-35.
16. Salter K, Jutai JW, Teasell R, Foley NC, Bitensky J, Bayley M. Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF participation. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27:507-528. (Pubitemid 40716304)
17. Trigg R, Wood VA. The subjective index of physical and social outcome (SIPSO): a new measure for use with stroke patients. Clin Rehabil 2000;14:288-299.
18. Whiteneck GG, Charlifue SW, Gerhart KA, Overholser JD, Richardson GN. Quantifying handicap: a new measure of long-term rehabilitation outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992;73:519-526.
19. Willer B, Ottenbacher KJ, Coad ML. The community integration questionnaire. A comparative examination. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1994;73:103-111
20. Cardol M, Beelen A, Van den Bos GA, De Jong BA, De Groot IJ, De Haan RJ. Responsiveness of the impact on participation and autonomy questionnaire. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 83:1524-1529.
21. Schmidt S, Bullinger M. Current issues in cross-cultural quality of life instrument development. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84 (Suppl 2):S29-S34.
22. Fukuhara S, Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Wada S, Gandek B. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity of the Japanese SF- 36 health survey. J Clin Epidemiol 1998;51:1045-1053.
23. Scott KM, Sarfati D, Tobias MI, Haslett SJ. A challenge to the cross-cultural validity of the SF-36 health survey: factor structure in Maori, Pacific and New Zealand European ethnic groups. Soc Sci Med 2000;51:1655-1664.
24. Hahn EA, Cella D. Health outcomes assessment in vulnerable populations: measurement challenges and recommendations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84 (Suppl 2):S35-S42.
25. Carr AJ, Higginson IJ. Are quality of life measures patient centred? BMJ 2001;322:1357-1360.
26. Dijkers MP. Individualization in quality of life measurement: instruments and approaches. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84 (Suppl 2):S3-S14.
27. Skevington SM, Lotfy M, O'Connell KA. The World Health Organization's WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL group. Qual Life Res 2004;13:299-310.
28. Taylor WJ, Myers J, Simpson RT, McPherson KM, Weatherall M. Quality of life of people with rheumatoid arthritis as measured by the World Health Organization quality of life instrument, short form (WHOQOL-BREF): score distributions and psychometric properties. Arthritis Rheum 2004;51:350-357.
29. Perenboom RJ, Chorus AM. Measuring participation according to the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Disabil Rehabil 2003;25:577-587.
30. Harwood RH, Gompertz P, Ebrahim S. Handicap one year after a stroke: validity of a new scale. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1994;57:825-829.
31. Westergren A, Hagell P. Initial validation of the Swedish version of the London handicap scale. Qual Life Res 2006;15:1251-1256.
32. Hershkovitz A, Belooseesky Y, Brill S, Gottlieb D. Is a day hospital rehabilitation programme associated with reduction of handicap in stroke patients? Clin Rehabil 2004;18:261-266.
33. Lo Raymond, Harwood R, Woo J, Yeung F, Ebrahim S. Cross-cultural validation of the London handicap scale in Hong Kong Chinese. Clin Rehabil 2001;15:177-185. (Pubitemid 32273204)
34. The British Society of Rehabilitation Medicine: Measurement of outcome in rehabilitation. Internet. 2000. http://www.bsrm. co.uk/ClinicalGuidance/ OutcomeMeasuresB3.pdf
35. Jenkinson C, Mant J, Carter J, WaDe D, Winner S. The London handicap scale: are-evaluation of its validity using standard scoring and simple summation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000;68:365-367.
36. Enderby PM, Wood VA, WaDe DT, Hewer RL. The Frenchay Aphasia screening test: a short, simple test for aphasia appropriate for non-specialists. Int Rehabil Med 1987;8:166-170.
37. Goodglass H, Kaplan E, editors. The Assessment of Aphasia and Related Disorders, 2nd ed. Lea & Febiger: Philadelphia; 1983.
38. World Health Organisation: WHOQOL-BREF Introduction, administration, scoring and generic version of the assessment. Internet. 1996. http://www.who.int/mental-health/media/en/76.pdf
39. Harwood RH, Rogers A, Dickinson E, Ebrahim S. Measuring handicap: the London handicap scale, a new outcome measure for chronic disease. Qual Health Care 1994;3:11-16.
40. Pain K, Dunn M, Anderson G, Darrah J, Kratochvil M. Quality of life: What does it mean in rehabilitation. J Rehabil 1998;64:5.
41. Sturm JW, Donnan GA, Dewey HM, MacDonnell RA, Gilligan AK, Srikanth V, Thrift AG. Quality of life after stroke: the North East Melbourne stroke incidence study (NEMESIS). Stroke 2004;35:2340-2345.
42. Ackerman IN, Graves SE, Bennell KL, Osborne RH. Evaluating quality of life in hip and knee replacement: psychometric properties of theWorld Health Organization quality of life short version instrument. Arthritis Rheum 2006;55:583-590.
43. Saxena S, Carlson D, Billington R. The WHO quality of life assessment instrument (WHOQOL-Bref): the importance of its items for cross-cultural research. Qual Life Res 2001;10:711-721.
44. D'Alisa S, Baudo S, Mauro A, Miscio G. How does stroke restrict participation in long-term post-stroke survivors? Acta Neurol Scand 2005;112:157-162.
45. Cheung E, Alvaro R, Colotla V. Psychological distress in workers with traumatic upper or lower limb amputations following industrial injuries. Rehabil Psychol 2003;48:109-112.
46. Kotila M, Numminen H, Waltimo O, Kaste M. Depression after stroke: results of the FINNSTROKE study. Stroke 1998;29:368-372.
47. Zhang L, Abreu BC, Gonzales V, Seale G, Masel B, Ottenbacher KJ. Comparison of the community integration questionnaire, the Craig handicap assessment and reporting technique, and the disability rating scale in traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2002;17:497-509.
48. Sandstrom M, Lundin-Olsson L. Development and evaluation of a new questionnaire for rating perceived participation1. Clin Rehabil 2007;21:833-845.
49. Ueda S, Okawa Y. The subjective dimension of functioning and disability: what is it and what is it for? Disabil Rehabil 2003;25:596-601.
50. WaDe DT, Halligan P. New wine in old bottles: the WHO ICF as an explanatory model of human behaviour. Clin Rehabil 2003;17:349-354.
51. Geyh S, Cieza A, Kollerits B, Grimby G, Stucki G. Content comparison of health-related quality of life measures used in stroke based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF): a systematic review. Qual Life Res 2007;16:833-851.