The relative importance of the face and body in judgments of human physical attractiveness

Evolution and Human Behavior

Volumn 30, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 409-416

  Currie, Thomas E ^a,b,d   Little, Anthony C ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

^d Graduate School of Arts and Sciences   (Japan)

Author keywords

Bodies; Evolution; Facial attractiveness; Multiple cues; Preferences; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349778477     PISSN: 10905138     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.06.005     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Alicke M.D., Smith R.H., and Klotz M.L. Judgments of physical attractiveness: The role of faces and bodies. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 12 (1986) 381-389
2. Barber N. The evolutionary psychology of physical attractiveness: Sexual selection and human morphology. Ethnology and Sociobiology 16 (1995) 395-424
3. Brown W.M., Cronk L., Grochow K., Jacobson A., Liu C.K., Popovic Z., and Trivers R. Dance reveals symmetry especially in young men. Nature 438 (2005) 1148-1150
4. Brown W.M., and Moore C. Is prospective altruist-detection an evolved solution to the adaptive problem of subtle cheating in cooperative ventures? Supportive evidence using the Wason selection task. Evolution and Human Behavior 21 (2000) 25-37
5. Brunswick E. Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments (1955), University of California Press, Berkeley
6. Buss D.M. The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating (1994), Basic Books, New York
7. Buss D.M., and Schmitt D.P. Sexual Strategies Theory-An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review 100 (1993) 204-232
8. Candolin U. The use of multiple cues in mate choice. Biological Reviews 78 (2003) 575-595
9. Fan J., Dai W., Liu F., and Wu J. Visual perception of male body attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 272 (2005) 219-226
10. Fessler D.M.T., Nettle D., Afshar Y., Pinheiro I.D., Bolyanatz A., Mulder M.B., Cravalho M., Delgado T., Gruzd B., Correia M.O., Khaltourina D., Korotayev A., Marrow J., de Souza L.S., and Zbarauskaite A. A cross-cultural investigation of the role of foot size in physical attractiveness. Archives of Sexual Behavior 34 (2005) 267-276
11. Furnham A., Lavancy M., and McClelland A. Waist to hip ratio and facial attractiveness: A pilot study. Personality and Individual Differences 30 (2001) 491-502
12. Gangestad S.W., and Thornhill R. Facial masculinity and fluctuating asymmetry. Evolution and Human Behavior 24 (2003) 231-241
13. Gibson R.M. Female choice in sage grouse: The roles of attraction and active comparison. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 39 (1996) 55-59
14. Grammer K., and Thornhill R. Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection-The role of symmetry and averageness. Journal of Comparative Psychology 108 (1994) 233-242
15. Holland B., and Rice W.R. Perspective: Chase-away sexual selection: Antagonistic seduction versus resistance. Evolution 52 (1998) 1-7
16. Honekopp J., Rudolph U., Beier L., Liebert A., and Muller C. Physical attractiveness of face and body as indicators of physical fitness in men. Evolution and Human Behavior 28 (2007) 106-111
17. Iwasa Y., and Pomiankowski A. The evolution of mate preferences for multiple sexual ornaments. Evolution 48 (1994) 853-867
18. Johnstone R.A. Multiple displays in animal communication: 'Backup signals' and 'multiple messages'. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 351 (1996) 329-338
19. Kenrick D.T., Sadalla E.K., Groth G., and Trost M.R. Evolution, traits, and the stages of human courtship-Qualifying the parental investment model. Journal of Personality 58 (1990) 97-116
20. Kodric-Brown A., and Nicoletto P.F. Female choice in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata): The interaction between male color and display. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 50 (2001) 346-351
21. Kunzler R., and Bakker T.C.M. Female preferences for single and combined traits in computer animated stickleback males. Behavioral Ecology 12 (2001) 681-685
22. Little A.C., Jones B.C., Waitt C., Tiddeman B.P., Feinberg D.R., Perrett D.I., Apicella C.L., and Marlowe F.W. Symmetry is related to sexual dimorphism in faces: Data across culture and species. PLOS one 3 5 (2008) e2106 10.1371/journal.pone.0002106
23. Manning J.T., Scutt D., Whitehouse G.H., and Leinster S.J. Breast asymmetry and phenotypic quality in women. Evolution and Human Behavior 18 (1997) 223-236
24. Miller G.F., and Todd P.M. Mate choice turns cognitive. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2 (1998) 190-198
25. Moller A.P., and Pomiankowski A. Why have birds got multiple sexual ornaments?. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 32 (1993) 167-176
26. Moller A.P., Saino N., Taramino G., Galeotti P., and Ferrario S. Paternity and multiple signaling: Effects of a secondary sexual character and song on paternity in the barn swallow. American Naturalist 151 (1998) 236-242
27. Morrison E.R., Gralewski L., Campbell N., and Penton-Voak I.S. Facial movement varies by sex and is related to attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior 28 (2007) 186-192
28. Mueser K.T., Grau B.W., Sussman M.S., and Rosen A.J. You're only as pretty as you feel: Facial expression as a determinant of physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46 (1984) 469-478
29. Oda R., Hiraishi K., and Matsumoto-Oda A. Does an altruist-detection cognitive mechanism function independently of a cheater-detection cognitive mechanism? Studies using Wason selection tasks. Evolution and Human Behavior 27 (2006) 366-380
30. Peters M., Rhodes G., and Simmons L.W. Contributions of the face and body to overall attractiveness. Animal Behaviour 73 (2007) 937-942
31. Pomiankowski A., and Iwasa Y. Evolution of multiple sexual preferences by Fisher runaway process of sexual selection. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 253 (1993) 173-181
32. Rhodes G., and Simmons L.W. Symmetry, attractiveness and sexual selection. In: Dunbar R.I.M., and Barrett L. (Eds). The Oxford Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology (2007), Oxford University Press, New York 333-364
33. Rowe C. Receiver psychology and the evolution of multicomponent signals. Animal Behaviour 58 (1999) 921-931
34. Singh D. Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness-Role of waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65 (1993) 293-307
35. Smith K.L., Cornelissen P.L., and Tovee M.J. Color 3D bodies and judgements of human female attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior 28 (2007) 48-54
36. Smith M.E., and Belk M.C. Risk assessment in western mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis): Do multiple cues have additive effects?. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 51 (2001) 101-107
37. Thornhill R., and Grammer K. The body and face of woman: One ornament that signals quality?. Evolution and Human Behavior 20 (1999) 105-120