Analysis of actuator delay compensation methods for real-time testing

Engineering Structures

Volumn 31, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 2643-2655

  Chen, Cheng ^a   Ricles, James M ^b  

^a SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Lehigh University   (United States)

Author keywords

Actuator delay; Compensation; Difference equation; Discrete transfer function; Frequency response; Magnitude; Phase; Real time testing

Indexed keywords

ACTUATOR DELAY; COMPENSATION; DISCRETE TRANSFER FUNCTION; MAGNITUDE; PHASE; REAL-TIME TESTING;

ACTUATORS; APPROXIMATION THEORY; CONTROL THEORY; DIFFERENCE EQUATIONS; FREQUENCY RESPONSE; FUNCTION EVALUATION; METHOD OF MOMENTS; REAL TIME SYSTEMS; TRANSFER FUNCTIONS;

TIME DOMAIN ANALYSIS;

DISCRETE ELEMENT METHOD; DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; HYDRAULIC STRUCTURE; MOMENT TENSOR; PARAMETERIZATION; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; REAL TIME; SEISMIC RESPONSE; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE; TESTING METHOD; TRANSFER FUNCTION;

EID: 70349775645     PISSN: 01410296     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.06.012     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Mahin S.A., and Shing P.B. Pseudodynamic method for seismic testing. J Struct Eng 111 7 (1985) 1482-1503
2. Shing P.B., and Mahin S.A. Computational aspects of a seismic performance test method using on-line computer control. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 13 4 (1985) 507-526
3. Takanashi K., and Nakashima M. Japanese activities on online testing. J Eng Mech 113 7 (1987) 1014-1032
4. Mahin S., Shing P.B., Thewalt C.R., and Hanson R.D. Pseudodynamic test method: Current status and future direction. J Struct Eng 115 8 (1989) 2113-2128
5. Shing P.B., Nakashima M., and Bursi O.S. Application of pseudodynamic test method to structural research. Earthq Spectra 12 1 (1996) 1121-1141
6. Dermitzakis SN, Mahin SA. Development of substructuring techniques for on-line computer controlled seismic performance testing. Report UBC/EERC-85/04. Berkeley: Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California; 1985
7. Soong T.T., and Spencer Jr. B.F. Supplemental energy dissipation: State-of-the-art and state-of-the-practice. Eng Struct 24 3 (2002) 243-259
8. Shing BP. Development of high-speed on-line substructuring testing system at the University of Colorado. Oxford (UK): CASCADE Technical Workshop; 2002
9. Nakashima M., Kato H., and Takaoka E. Development of real-time pseudodynamic testing. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 21 1 (1992) 79-92
10. Horiuchi T., Inoue M., Konno T., and Namita Y. Real-time hybrid experimental system with actuator delay compensation and its application to a piping system with energy absorber. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 28 10 (1999) 1121-1141
11. Nakashima M. Development, potential, and limitations of real-time on-line (pseudo-dynamic) testing. Phil Trans R Soc 359 (2001) 1851-1867
12. Blakeborough A., Williams M.S., Darby A.P., and Williams D.M. The development of real-time substructure testing. Phil Trans R Soc 359 (2001) 1869-1891
13. Wu B., Xu G., Wang Q., and Williams M.S. Operator-splitting method for real-time substructure testing. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 35 3 (2006) 93-314
14. Chen C., Ricles J.M., Marullo T.M., and Mercan O. Real-time hybrid testing using the unconditionally stable explicit CR integration algorithm. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 38 1 (2009) 23-44
15. Horiuchi T., and Konno T. A new method for compensating actuator delay in real-time hybrid experiment. Phil Trans R Soc 359 (2001) 1893-1909
16. Darby A.P., Blakeborough A., and Williams M.S. Real-time substructuring tests using hydraulic actuator. J Eng Mech 125 10 (2001) 1133-1139
17. Wallace M.I., Sieber J., Neild S.A., Wagg D.J., and Krauskopf B. Stability analysis of real-time dynamic substructuring using delay differential equation models. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 34 15 (2005) 1817-1832
18. Mercan O., and Ricles J.M. Stability and accuracy analysis of outer loop dynamics in real-time pseudodynamic testing of SDOF systems. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 36 11 (2007) 1523-1543
19. Chen C., and Ricles J.M. Stability analysis of explicit integration algorithms with actuator delay for real-time hybrid testing. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 37 4 (2008) 597-613
20. Carrion JE, Spencer Jr BF. Real-time hybrid testing using model-based delay compensation. In: 4th International conference on earthquake engineering, 2006
21. Zhao J., French C., Shield C., and Posbergh T. Considerations for the development of real-time dynamic testing using servo-hydraulic actuation. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 32 11 (2003) 1773-1794
22. Jung R.Y., and Shing P.B. Performance evaluation of a real-time pseudodynamic test system. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 35 7 (2006) 789-810
23. Mercan O. Analytical and experimental studies on large scale, real-time pseudodynamic testing. Ph.D. dissertation. Bethlehem (PA): Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Lehigh University; 2007
24. Chen C. Development and numerical simulation of hybrid effective testing method. Ph.D. dissertation. Bethlehem (PA): Lehigh University; 2007
25. Wallace M.I., Wagg D.J., and Neild S.A. An adaptive polynomial based forward prediction algorithm for multi-actuator real-time dynamic substructuring. Proc R Soc A 461 (2005) 3807-3826
26. Bonnet P.A., Lim C.N., William M.S., Blakeborough A., Neild S.A., Stoten D.P., et al. Real-time hybrid experiments with Newmark integration, MCSmd outer-loop control and multi-tasking strategies. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 36 1 (2007) 119-141
27. Ahmadizadeh M., Mosqueda G., and Reihorn A.M. Compensation of actuator delay and dynamics for real-time hybrid structural simulation. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 37 1 (2008) 21-42
28. Nakashima M., and Masaoka N. Real-time online test for MDOF systems. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 28 4 (1992) 393-420
29. Franklin G.F., Powell J.D., and Naeini A.E. Feedback control of dynamic system. 4th ed. (2002), Prentice-Hall, New Jersey
30. Ogata K. Discrete-time control systems. 2nd ed. (1995), Prentice-Hall, New Jersey
31. Ramirez M.R. New Methods in Transient Analysis ASME PVP-vol. 246/AMD-VOL. 143 (1992)
32. Mugan A., and Hulbert G.M. Frequency domain analysis of time integration methods for semidiscrete finite element equations, Part I. Parabolic problems. Int J Numer Methods Eng 51 3 (2001) 333-350
33. Mugan A., and Hulbert G.M. Frequency domain analysis of time integration methods for semidiscrete finite element equations, Part II. Hyperbolic and parabolic-hyperbolic problems. Int J Numer Methods Eng 51 3 (2001) 351-376
34. Chen C., and Ricles J.M. Development of direct integration algorithm for structural dynamics using discrete control theory. J Eng Mech 134 8 (2008) 676-683
35. Chen C., and Ricles J.M. Stability analysis of direct integration algorithms under nonlinear structural dynamics. J Eng Mech 134 9 (2008) 703-711
36. MATLAB (2007). Version 7.0. Natick, (MA): Mathworks Inc
37. Newmark N.M. A method of computation for structural dynamics. J Eng Mech 85 3 (1959) 67-94
38. Ricles JM. Real-time multi-directional (RTMD) earthquake simulation facility users guide. 2nd ed. Bethlehem (PA): Lehigh University; 2006. http://www.nees.lehigh.edu/res/RTMD_Users_Guide.pdf
39. Kontopanos A. Experimental investigation of a prototype elastomeric structural damper. M.S. thesis. Bethlehem (PA): Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Lehigh University; 2006