An adaptive polynomial based forward prediction algorithm for multi-actuator Real-time dynamic substructuring

Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences

Volumn 461, Issue 2064, 2005, Pages 3807-3826

  Wallace, M I ^a   Wagg, D J ^a   Neild, S A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Delay compensation; Numerical experimental testing; Real time; Substructuring; Synchronization theory

Indexed keywords

ACTUATORS; ERRORS; ONLINE SYSTEMS; PLANT SHUTDOWNS; SYNCHRONIZATION;

ADAPTIVE FEEDBACK; COMPLEX STRUCTURE; CONTROL LOOP; DELAY COMPENSATION; DELAY ERRORS; DYNAMIC BEHAVIOURS; EXPERIMENTAL TECHNIQUES; EXPERIMENTAL TEST; FORWARD PREDICTION; GENERIC APPROACH; HYBRID MODEL; LOSS OF ACCURACY; MASS-SPRING-DAMPER SYSTEM; NUMERICAL MODELS; NUMERICAL-EXPERIMENTAL TESTING; PLANT DYNAMICS; PRIOR KNOWLEDGE; REAL-TIME; REAL-TIME DYNAMIC SUBSTRUCTURING; SINGLE-STEP; SUBSTRUCTURING; TRANSFER SYSTEMS;

ADAPTIVE ALGORITHMS;

EID: 33846051930     PISSN: 13645021     EISSN: 14712946     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2005.1532     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. This article cites 16 articles http://rspa.royalsocietypublishing.org/ content/461/2064/3807.full.html#ref-list-1 Article cited in: http://rspa.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/461/2064/3807.full. html#related-urls An adaptive polynomial based forward prediction algorithm for multi-actuator real-time dynamic substructuring
2. Ashwin, P. 1998 Non-linear dynamics, loss of synchronisation and symmetry breaking. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng G 212, 183-187. (doi:10.1243/0954410981532252.)
3. åström, K. J. and Wittenmark, B. 1995 Adaptive control, 2nd edn. New York: Addison-Wesley.
4. Blakeborough, A., Williams, M. S., Darby, A. P. and Williams, D. M. 2001 The development of real-time substructure testing. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 359, 1869-1891. (doi:10.1098/rsta.2001.0860.)
5. Darby, A. P., Blakeborough, A. and Williams, M. S. 2001a Improved control algorithm for real-time substructure testing. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 30, 431-448. (doi:10.1002/eqe.18.)
6. Darby, A. P., Blakeborough, A. and Williams, M. S. 2001b Real-time substructure tests using hydraulic actuator.J. Eng. Mech. Am. Soc. Civil Eng. 125, 1133-1139.
7. Darby, A. P., Williams, M. S. and Blakeborough, A. 2002 Stability and delay compensation for real-time substructure testing. J. Eng. Mech. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 128, 1276-1284.
8. Donea, J., Magonette, P., Negro, P., Pegon, P., Pinto, A. and Verzeletti, G. 1996 Pseudodynamic capabilities of the ELSA laboratory for earthquake testing of large structures. Earthquake Spectra 12, 163-180. (doi:10.1193/1.1585873.)
9. Gawthrop, P. J., Wallace, M. I. and Wagg, D. J. 2005 Bond-graph based substructuring of dynamical systems. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 34, 687-703.
10. Horiuchi, T., Inoue, M., Konno, T. and Namita, Y. 1999 Real-time hybrid experimental system with actuator delay compensation and its application to a piping system with energy absorber. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 28, 1121-1141. (doi:10.1002 /(SICI) 1096-9845 (199910) 28:10! 1121::AID-EQE858O3.3. CO;2-F.)
11. Kreyszig, E. 1999 Advanced engineering mathematics, 8th edn. New York: Wiley.
12. Mahin, S. A. and Shing, P. B. 1985 Pseudodynamic method of seismic testing. J. Struct. Eng. 111, 1482-1503.
13. Mosqueda, G. 2003 Continuous hybrid simulation with geographically distributed substructures. Ph. D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley.
14. Nakashima, M. and Masaoka, N. 1999 Real-time on-line test for MDOF systems. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 28, 393-420. (doi:10.1002 /(SICI) 1096-9845 (199904) 28:4!393::AID-EQE823O3.3. CO;2-3.)
15. Nakashima, M., Kato, H. and Takaoka, E. 1992 Development of real-time pseudo dynamic testing. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 21, 779-792.
16. Neild, S. A., Drury, D., Wagg, D. J., Stoten, D. P. and Crewe, A. J. 2002 Implementing real time adaptive control methods for substructuring of large structures. In Proc. 3rd World Conf. on Structural Control, Como, Italy, 7-12 April 2002 (ed. F. Casciati), vol. 2, pp. 811-817.
17. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
18. Neild, S. A., Stoten, D. P., Drury, D. and Wagg, D. J. 2005 Control issues relating to real-time substructuring experiments using a shaking table. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 34, 1171-1192. (doi:10.1002/eqe.473.)
19. Pinto, A. V., Pegon, P., Magonette, G. and Tsionis, G. 2004 Pseudo-dynamic testing of bridges using non-linear substructuring. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 33, 1125-1146. (doi:10.1002/eqe.393.)
20. Sivaselvan, M. V., Reinhorn, A., Liang, Z. and Shao, X. 2004 Real-time dynamic hybrid testing of structural systems. In Proc. 13th World Conf. Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, Canada, 1-6 August 2004, paper no. 1644.
21. Wagg, D. J. and Stoten, D. P. 2001 Substructuring of dynamical systems via the adaptive minimal control synthesis algorithm. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 30, 865-877. (doi:10.1002/eqe.44.)
22. Wallace, M. I., Wagg, D. J. and Neild, S. A. 2004 Multi-actuator substructure testing with applications to earthquake engineering: how do we assess accuracy? In Proc. 13th World Conf. Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, Canada, 1-6 August 2004, paper no. 3241.
23. Williams, M. S. and Blakeborough, A. 2001 Laboratory testing of structures under dynamic loads: an introductory review. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 359, 1651-1669. (doi:10.1098/rsta.2001.0880.)