Status homogamy in the preindustrial marriage market: Partner selection according to age, social origin, and place of birth in nineteenth-century rural Sweden

Journal of Family History

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 387-406

  Dribe, Martin ^a   Lundh, Christer ^b  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Age homogamy; Geographic endogamy; Marriage market; Nineteenth century; Partner selection; Social homogamy

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMMUNITY CARE; ECONOMICS; EDUCATION; ETHNIC GROUP; ETHNOLOGY; FAMILY HEALTH; FAMILY RELATION; FAMILY SIZE; HISTORY; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; LEGAL ASPECT; MARRIAGE; MINORITY GROUP; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL CLASS; SOCIAL STATUS; SPOUSE; SWEDEN;

COMMUNITY NETWORKS; ETHNIC GROUPS; FAMILY CHARACTERISTICS; FAMILY HEALTH; FAMILY RELATIONS; HISTORY, 19TH CENTURY; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MARRIAGE; MINORITY GROUPS; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL CLASS; SOCIAL CONDITIONS; SPOUSES; SWEDEN;

EID: 70349756765     PISSN: 03631990     EISSN: 15525473     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0363199009344708     Document Type: Article

References (95)

1. H. J. Habakkuk, Population Growth and Economic Development since 1750 (Leicester, UK: Leicester University Press, 1971).
2. E. A. Wrigley and Roger S. Schofield, The Population History of England 1541-1871: A Reconstruction (London: Edward Arnold, 1981).
3. Also see Deepak Lal, Unintended Consequences. The Impact of Factor Endowments, Culture and Politics on Long-run Economic Performance (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999).
4. John Hajnal, European Marriage Patterns in Perspective, in Population in History, ed. D. V. Glass and D. E. C. Eversley (London: Edward Arnold, 1965), 101-43.
5. John Hajnal, Two Kinds of Pre-industrial Household Formation System, in Family Forms in Historic Europe, ed. R. Wall, P. Laslett, and J. Robin (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1983), 65-104.
6. Peter Laslett, Family and Household as Work Group and Kin Group: Areas of Traditional Europe Compared, in Family Forms in Historic Europe, ed. R. Wall, P. Laslett, and J. Robin (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1983), 513-63.
7. William G. Skinner, Family Systems and Demographic Processes, in Anthropological Demography. Towards a New Synthesis, ed. D. I. Kertzer and T. Fricke (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997), 53-95.
8. Theo Engelen and Arthur P. Wolf, eds., Marriage and the Family in Eurasia. Perspectives on the Hajnal Hypothesis (Amsterdam: Aksant, 2005).
9. Hajnal, Two Kinds of Pre-industrial.
10. Richard Wall, Real Property, Marriage and Children: The Evidence from Four Pre-industrial Communities, in Land, Kinship and Life-Cycle, ed. R. M. Smith (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1984), 443-79.
11. Timothy W. Guinnane, Re-thinking the Western European Marriage Pattern: The Decision to Marry in Ireland at the Turn of the Century, Journal of Family History 16, no. 1 (1991): 47-64.
12. Guinnane, Re-thinking the Western European Marriage Pattern.
13. Martin Dribe and Christer Lundh, Retirement as a Strategy for Land Transmission: A Micro-study of Preindustrial Rural Sweden, Continuity and Change 20, no. 2 (2005): 165-91.
14. See, e.g., David Gaunt, The Property and Kin Relationships of Retired Farmers in Northern and Central Europe, in Family Forms in Historic Europe, ed. R. Wall, P. Laslett, and J. Robin (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1983), 249-79.
15. Christer Lundh and Mats Olsson, The Institution of Retirement on Scanian Estates in the Nineteenth Century, Continuity and Change 17, no. 3 (2002): 373-403.
16. E.g.,Erik Beekink, Aart C. Liefbroer, and Frans van Poppel, Changes in Choice of Spouse as an Indicator of a Society in a State of Transition: Woerden, 1830-1930, Historical Social Research 22, no. 1/2 (2002): 231-53.
17. Marco H. D. van Leeuwen and Ineke Maas, Partner Choice and Homogamy in the Nineteenth Century: Was There a Sexual Revolution in Europe? Journal of Social History 36, no. 1 (2002): 101-23.
18. Marco H. D. van Leeuwen, Ineke Maas, and Andrew Miles, eds., Marriage Choices and Class Boundaries: Social Endogamy in History, International Review of Social History 50, suppl. 13 (2005): 247-74.
19. Bart van de Putte, Homogamy by Geographical Origin: Segregation in Nineteenth-century Flemish Cities (Gent, Leuven, and Aalst), Journal of Family History 28, no. 3 (2003): 364-90.
20. Beekink, Liefbroer, and van Poppel, Changes in Choice of Spouse.
21. Bart van de Putte and Koen Matthijs, Romantic Love and Marriage. A Study of Age Homogamy in 19th Century Leuven, Revue Belge d'Histoire Contemporaine 31, no. 3/4 (2001): 579-619.
22. Frans van Poppel, Aart C. Liefbroer, Jeroen K. Vermunt, and Wilma Smeenk, Love, Necessity and Opportunity: Changing Patterns of Marital Age Homogamy in the Netherlands, 1850-1993, Population Studies 55, no. 1 (2001): 1-13.
23. E.g., Beekink, Liefbroer, and van Poppel, Changes in Choice of Spouse.
24. van de Putte, Homogamy by Geographical Origin.
25. Bart van de Putte, The Influence of Modern City Life on Marriage in Ghent at the Turn of the Century: Cultural Struggle and Social Differentiation in Demographic Behavior, Journal of Family History 32, no. 4 (2007): 433-58.
26. van de Putte and Matthijs, Romantic Love and Marriage.
27. E.g., Andrew J. Cherlin, The Deinstitutionalization of American Marriage, Journal of Marriage and Family 66, no. 4 (2004): 848-61.
28. Stephanie Coontz, The World Historical Transformation of Marriage, Journal of Marriage and Family 66, no. 4 (2004): 974-79.
29. Michael Mitterauer and Reinhard Sieder, The European Family: Patriarchy to Partnership from the Middle Ages to the Present (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983), chap. 6.
30. Edward Shorter, The Making of the Modern Family (Glasgow, UK: Fontana Books, 1977), chap. 2.
31. Lawrence Stone, The Family, Sex and Marriage in England 1500-1800 (London: Penguin, 1979), chap. 7.
32. Ernest W. Burgess and Harvey J. Locke, The Family: From Institution to Companionship (New York: American Book Company, 1945).
33. William J. Goode, The Family (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1964), 108-9.
34. Shorter, Making of the Modern Family, 152-63, 250-62.
35. Stone, Family, Sex and Marriage, chap. 7.
36. Also see van Leeuwen and Maas, Partner Choice and Homogamy.
37. E.g., John Gillis, Making Time for Family: The Invention of Family Time(s) and the Reinvention of Family History, Journal of Family History 21, no. 1 (1996): 4-21.
38. Koen Matthijs, Demographic and Sociological Indicators of Privatisation of Marriage in the 19th Century in Flanders, European Journal of Population 19, no. 4 (2003): 375-412.
39. Cherlin, Deinstitutionalization of American Marriage.
40. E.g., Coontz, World Historical Transformation of Marriage.
41. E.g., Pierre Bourdieu, Marriage Strategies as Strategies of Social Reproduction, in Family and Society. Selections from the Annales Economies, Sociétiés, Civilisations, ed. R. Forster and O. Ranum (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1976), 117-44.
42. E.g., Matthijs Kalmijn, Intermarriage and Homogamy: Causes, Patterns, Trends, Annual Review of Sociology 24 (1998): 395-421.
43. Robert D. Mare, Five Decades of Educational Assortative Mating, American Sociological Review 56, no. 1 (1991): 15-32.
44. Jeroen Smits, Wout Ultee, and Jan Lammers, Educational Homogamy in 65 Countries: The Explanation of Differences in Openness with Country-level Explanatory Variables, American Sociological Review 63, no. 2 (1998): 264-85.
45. Skinner, Family Systems and Demographic Processes.
46. Helena Z. Lopata, Widows: The Middle East, Asia and the Pacific (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1987).
47. Gary S. Becker, A Treatise on the Family (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981).
48. Martin Dribe and Christer Lundh, Finding the Right Partner: Rural Homogamy in Nineteenth-century Sweden, International Review of Social History 50, suppl. (2005): 149-77.
49. See, e.g., van Leeuwen and Maas, Partner Choice and Homogamy. For a different view, see Beekink, Liefbroer, and van Poppel, Changes in Choice of Spouse.
50. Mare, Five Decades.
51. Smits, Ultee, and Lammers, Educational Homogamy in 65 Countries. For evidence for Sweden.
52. see Ursula Henz and Jan O. Jonsson, Who Marries Whom in Sweden? in Who Marries Whom? Educational Systems as Marriage Markets in Modern Societies, ed. H.-P. Blossfeld and A. Timm (Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer, 2003), 235-66.
53. Kalmijn, Intermarriage and Homogamy.
54. Skinner, Family Systems and Demographic Processes.
55. Roger Schofield, The Relationship between Demographic Structure and Environment in Pre-industrial Western Europe, in Sozialgeschichte der familie in der Neuzeit Europas, ed. W. Conze (Stuttgart, Germany, 1976), 147-60.
56. John E. Knodel, Demographic Behavior in the Past. A Study of Fourteen German Village Populations in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1988), 137.
57. Mitterauer and Sieder, European Family, 65-66.
58. van Poppel at al., Love, Necessity and Opportunity.
59. Maxine P. Atkinson and Becky L. Glass, Marital Age Heterogamy and Homogamy, 1900 to 1980, Journal of Marriage and Family 47, no. 3 (1985): 685-91.
60. Harriet B. Presser, Age Difference between Spouses. Trends, Patterns, and Social Implications, American Behavioral Scientist 19, no. 2 (1975): 190-205.
61. Zhenchao Qian, Changes in Assortative Mating: The Impact of Age and Education, 1970-1990, Demography 35, no. 3 (1998): 279-92.
62. van de Putte and Matthijs, Romantic Love and Marriage.
63. van Poppel et al., Love, Necessity and Opportunity.
64. van Poppel et al., Love, Necessity and Opportunity.
65. Martin Dribe and Christer Lundh, Gender Aspects of Inheritance Strategies and Land Transmission in Rural Scania, Sweden, 1720-1840, History of the Family 10, no. 3 (2005): 293-308.
66. Dribe and Lundh, Retirement as a Strategy.
67. E.g., Margareta Matovic, Migration, Family Formation, and Choice of Marriage Partners in Stockholm, 1860-1890, in Urbanization in History. A Process of Dynamic Interaction, ed. A. van der Woude, J. de Vries, and A. Hayami (Oxford, UK: Clarendon, 1990), 220-42.
68. Michel Oris, The Age at Marriage of Migrants during the Industrial Revolution in the Region of Liège, History of the Family 5, no. 4 (2000): 391-413.
69. van de Putte, Homogamy by Geographical Origin.
70. Martine Segalen, Mean Age at Marriage and Kinship Networks in a Town under the Influence of the Metropolis: Nanterre 1800-1850, Journal of Family History 16, no. 1 (1991): 65-78.
71. The Scanian Demographic Database is maintained by the Centre for Economic Demography, Lund University, Sweden (http://www.ed.lu.se).
72. See Martin Dribe, Leaving Home in a Peasant Society. Economic Fluctuations, Household Dynamics and Youth Migration in Southern Sweden, 1829-1866 (Södertälje, Sweden: Almqvist & Wiksell International, 2000).
73. Statistics Sweden, Befolkningsutvecklingen under 250 år (Stockholm: SCB, 1999), 42.
74. Tommy Bengtsson and Christer Lundh, Evaluation of a Swedish Computer Program for Automatic Family Reconstitution, Lund Papers in Economic History 8 (1991): 1-43.
75. See, e.g., Alice B. Kasakoff and John W. Adams, The Effect of Migration on Ages at Vital Events: A Critique of Family Reconstitution in Historical Demography, European Journal of Population 11, no. 3 (1995): 199-242.
76. Steven Ruggles, Migration, Marriage and Mortality: Correcting Sources of Bias in English Family Reconstitutions, Population Studies 46, no. 3 (1992): 507-22.
77. Steven Ruggles, The Limitations of English Family Reconstitution: English Population History from Family Reconstitution 1580-1837, Continuity and Change 14, no. 1 (1999): 105-30.
78. E. A. Wrigley, The Effect of Migration on the Estimation of Marriage Age in Family Reconstitution Studies, Population Studies 48, no. 1 (1994): 81-97.
79. Dribe, Leaving Home.
80. Martin Dribe, Migration of Rural Families in Nineteenth Century Southern Sweden: A Longitudinal Analysis of Local Migration Patterns, History of the Family 8, no. 2 (2003): 247-65.
81. Martin Dribe and Christer Lundh, People on the Move. Determinants of Servant Migration in Nineteenth Century Sweden, Continuity and Change 20, no 1. (2005): 53-91.
82. See Dribe, Leaving Home, chap. 2.
83. We have used one-sixteenth mantal (a rough measure of the productive potential of the farm) as the limit of subsistence, which is also the way the contemporary society defined it. For a discussion, see Dribe, Leaving Home, chap. 2.
84. See, e.g., Carl-Johan Gadd, Den agrara revolutionen 1700-1870 (Stockholm: Natur & Kultur, 2000), 76, 198-202.
85. E.g.,ibid., 76-78, 86.
86. Mats Olsson, Storgodsdrift. Godsekonomi och arbetsorganisation i Skåne från dansk tid till mitten av 1800-talet (Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 2002).
87. see Dribe, Leaving Home, 19.
88. Dribe and Lundh, Finding the Right Partner.
89. Kalmijn, Intermarriage and Homogamy.
90. Dribe and Lundh, Finding the Right Partner.
91. See Eva Wigström, Allmogeseder i Rönnebergs härad på 1840-talet (Malmö, Sweden: Gidlunds, 1891/1985).
92. Dribe and Lundh, Finding the Right Partner.
93. See, e.g., Qian, Changes in Assortative Mating.
94. van Poppel et al., Love, Necessity and Opportunity.
95. Lundh and Olsson, The Institution of Retirement.