Essential concepts of engineering design curriculum in secondary technology education

Journal of Technology Education

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 65-80

  Wicklein, Robert ^a   Smith Jr , Phillip Cameron ^b   Kim, Soo Jung ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b Engineering and Technology Education teacher at Oconee County High School in Watkinsville   (United States)

^c Samsung SDS   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349754204     PISSN: 10451064     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.21061/jte.v20i2.a.5     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology. (1986). Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs. ABET. Baltimore, MD. Retrieved October 28, 2006, from http://www.abet.org/Linked%20Documents-UPDATE/Criteria%20and%20PP/E001%2005-06%20EAC%20Criteria%209-15-05.pdf.
2. Bensen, J. (1995). A context for technology education. In G. E. Martin (Ed.), Foundations of technology education, 44th yearbook of the council on technology teacher education. (pp. 1-24). Peoria, IL: Glencoe/McGraw- Hill.
3. Boser, R. A., Palmer, J. D., & Daugherty, M. K. (1998). Students' attitude toward technology in selected technology education programs. Journal of Technology Education, 10(1), 4-19.
4. Borg, W. R., Gall, J. P., & Gall, M. D. (2003). Educational research: An introduction (7th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
5. Burghardt, M. D. (1999). Introduction to engineering design and problem solving. New York: McGraw-Hill.
6. Cotton, S. E. (2002). Making problem-solving simulations more realistic. The Technology Teacher, 62(3), 29-32.
7. Dalkey, N. C. (1968). Predicting the future. Santa Monica, CA: The Rand Corporation.
8. Dalkey, N., & Helmer, O. (1963). An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Management Science 9(3), 27-34.
9. Dean, B. P., & West, R. (1999). Characteristics of viable and sustainable workers for the year. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Point Clear, AL, November 1999. (ED 435 838).
10. Dearing, B. M. & Daugherty, M. K. (2004). Delivering engineering content in technology education. The Technology Teacher, 64(3), 8-11.
11. Delbecq, A. L., Van de Ven, A. H., & Gustafson, D. H. (1975). Group techniques for program planning: A guide to nominal group and Delphi processes. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company.
12. Devore, P. W. (1968). Structure and content foundations for curriculum development. Washington, DC: American Industrial Arts Association.
13. Dugger, W. E. (1994). The relationship between technology, science, engineering, and mathematics. The Technology Teacher, 53(7), 5-8.
14. Dym, C. L. (1994). Engineering design: A synthesis of views. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
15. Dyrenfurth, M. J. (1991). Technology literacy synthesized. In M. J. Dyrenfurth & M. Kozak (Eds.), Technological literacy, 40th yearbook of the council on technology teacher education. (pp. 138-183). Peoria, IL: Glencoe/McGraw-Hill.
16. Eide, A. R., Jenison, R. D., Mashaw, L. H., & Northup, L. L. (2001). Introduction to engineering design and problem solving. New York: McGraw-Hill.
17. Engstrom, D. E. (2001). Ten components of a good technology education activity. The Technology Teacher, 61(3), 8-10.
18. Fales, J. F., Kuetemeyer, V. F., & Brusic, S. A. (1998). Technology: Today & tomorrow. New York: Glencoe/McGraw-Hill.
19. Foster, P. N., & Wright, M. D. (1996). Selected leaders' perceptions of approaches to technology education. Journal of Technology Education, 7(2), 13-27.
20. Gattie, D. & Wicklein, R. C., (2007). Curricular value and instructional needs for infusing engineering design into k-12 technology education. Journal of Technology Education, 19(1), 6-18.
21. Hailey, C. E., Erekson, T., Becker, K., & Thomas, T. (2005). National center for engineering and technology education. The Technology Teacher, 64(5), 23-26.
22. Halfin, H. H. (1973). Technology: A process approach. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, West Virginia University, Morgantown.
23. Hatch, L. (1988). Problem-solving approach. In W. H. Kemp & A. E. Schwaller (Eds.), Instructional strategies for technology education, 37th yearbook of the council on technology teacher education. Mission Hills, CA: Glencoe.
24. Hill, R. B. (1997). The design of an instrument to assess problem solving activities in technology education. Journal of Technology Education, 9(1). Retrieved April 20, 2004, from http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JTE/v9n1/pdf/.
25. International Technology Education Association (1996). Technology for all Americans: A rationale and structure for the study of technology. Reston, VA: International Technology Education Association.
26. International Technology Education Association (2000). Standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology. Reston, VA: International Technology Education Association.
27. International Technology Education Association (2003). Advancing excellence in technological literacy: Student assessment, professional development, and program standards. Reston, VA: International Technology Education Association.
28. LaPorte, J. E. (2001). Of melting pots, football drafts, and Professor Jackson. Journal of Technology Education, 12(2), 2-4.
29. Lewis, T. (1999). Content or process as approaches to technology curriculum: Does it matter come Monday morning? Journal of Technology Education, 11(2). Retrieved April 20, 2004, from http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JTE/v11n1/lewis.html.
30. Lewis, T. (2004). A turn to engineering: The continuing struggle of technology education for legitimization as a school subject. Journal of Technology Education, 16(1). Retrieved February 3, 2005, from http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JTE/v16n1/lewis.html.
31. Linstone, H. A., & Murray, T. (1975). The Delphi method: Techniques and applications. Reading, MS: Addison-Wesley.
32. Loepp, F. L. (2004). Standards: Mathematics and science compared to technological literacy. Journal of Technological Studies, 30(1), 2-10.
33. Maley, D. (1973). The Maryland plan. Beverly Hills, CA: Bruce.
34. Martino, J. P. (1983). Technological forecasting and decision making (2nd ed.). New York: Elsevier Science Publishing.
35. Meade, S. D., & Dugger, W. E. (2004). Reporting on the status of technology education in the U.S. The Technology Teacher, 64(2), 29-35.
36. Merrill, C. & Comerford, M. (2004). Technology and mathematics standards: An integrated approach. The Technology Teacher, 64(2), 8-10.
37. Parnell, D. (1995). Why do I have to learn this? Teaching the way children learn best. Waco, TX: CORD Communications.
38. Rojewski, J. W., & Meers, G. D. (1991). Directions for future research in vocational special education. Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois, Department of Vocational and Technical Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 339 837).
39. Salancik, J. R., Wenger W., & Helfer, E. (1971). The construction of Delphi event statements. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 3(1), 65-73.
40. Sanders, M. (2001). New paradigm or old wine? The status of technology education practice in the United States. Journal of Technology Education, 12(2),35-55.
41. Satchwell, R., & Dugger, W. (1996). A united vision: Technology for all Americans. Journal of Technology Education, 7(2), 5-12.
42. Savage, E., & Sterry, L. (1990). A conceptual framework for technology education. Reston, VA: International Technology Education Association.
43. Snyder, J. F., & Hales, J. F. (1981). Jackson's Mill industrial arts curriculum theory. Charleston: West Virginia Department of Education.
44. Turoff, M. (1970). The design of a policy Delphi. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2(2), 149-171
45. Wamsley, B. (2003). Partnership-centered learning: The case for pedagogic balance in technology education. Journal of Technology Education, 14(2). Retrieved April 20, 2004, from http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JTE/v14n2/walmsley.html.
46. Wicklein, C., & Rojewski, J. (1999). Toward a "unified curriculum framework" for technology education. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 36(4). Retrieved April 20, 2004, from http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JITE/v36n4/wicklein.html.
47. Wicklein, R. C. (2004). Critical issues and problems in technology education. The Technology Teacher, 64(4), 6-9.
48. Wright, P. (2002) Introduction to engineering. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
49. Wright, R. T., & Lauda, D. P. (1993). Technology education - A position statement. The Technology Teacher, 52(4), 3-5.