Curricular value and instructional needs for infusing engineering design into K-12 technology education

Journal of Technology Education

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 6-18

  Gattie, David K ^a   Wicklein, Robert C ^b  

^a Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering ^*

^b UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 50149099760     PISSN: 10451064     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.21061/jte.v19i1.a.1     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Dearing, B.M. & Daugherty, M.K. (2004). Delivering engineering content in technology education. The Technology Teacher, 64(3), 8-11
2. DeVore, P. (1964). Technology: An intellectual discipline. Washington, D.C.: American Industrial Arts Association.
3. th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
4. International Technology Education Association, (1996). Technology for all America: A rationale and structure for the study of technology. Reston, VA
5. International Technology Education Association, (2000). Standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology. Reston, VA.
6. International Technology Education Association, (2003). Advancing excellence in technological literacy: Student assessment, professional development, and program standards. Reston, VA.
7. National Science Board (2003). The Science and Engineering Workforce Realizing America's Potential. The National Science Foundation, NSB 03-69.
8. Phillips, K. (1985). A progression of technology in industrial arts education in technology education: A perspective on implementation. (pp.15-18). Reston, VA: International Technology Education Association.
9. Savage, E. & Sterry, L. (1990). A conceptual framework for technology education. International Technology Education Association. Reston, VA.
10. rd ed.) Boston: McGraw-Hill.
11. Wicklein, R.C. (2006). 5 Good reasons for engineering design as the focus for technology education. The Technology Teacher, 65(7), 25-29.