Osmotic adjustment is a significant mechanism of drought resistance in Pinus pinaster and Pinus canariensis;El ajuste osmótico como mecanismo de resistencia a la sequía en poblaciones áridas de P. pinaster y P. canariensis

Investigacion Agraria Sistemas y Recursos Forestales

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 159-166

  Lopez R ^a   Aranda, I ^b   Gil, L ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b INIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Biomass partitioning; Canary Island pine; Hydroponic culture; Maritime pine; Polyethylene glycol

Indexed keywords

PINUS CANARIENSIS; PINUS PINASTER;

EID: 70349705906     PISSN: 11317965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5424/fs/2009182-01059     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. ALÍA R., GIL L., PARDOS J.A., 1995. Performance of 43 Pinus pinaster Ait. provenances on 5 locations in central Spain. Silvae Genet 44, 75-81.
2. ALI ́A R., MARTÍN S., DE MIGUEL J., GALERA R., AGÚNDEZ D., GORDO J., SALVADOR L., CATALÁN G., GIL L. (eds), 1996. Las regiones de procedencia de Pinus pinaster Aiton en España. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Madrid, España, 75pp.
3. ALÍA R., MORO J., DENIS J.B., 1997. Performance of Pinus pinaster provenances in Spain: interpretation of the genotype by environment interaction. Can J For Res 27, 1548-1559.
4. BLOOM A.J., CHAPIN F.S., MOONEY H.A., 1985. Resource limitation in plants-an economic analogy. Annu Rev Ecol Evol S 16, 363-392.
5. BLUM A., 1998. Improving wheat grain filling under stress by stem reserve mobilisation Euphytica 100, 77-83.
6. BLUM A., SINMENA B., MAYER J., GOLAN G., SHPILER L., 1994. Stem reserve mobilization supports wheat grain filling under heat stress. Aust J Plant Physiol 21, 771-781.
7. BONGARTEN B.C., TESKEY R.O., 1987. Dry weight partitioning and its relationship to productivity in loblolly pine seedlings from seven sources. Forest Sci 33, 255-267.
8. CALAMASSI R., DELLA ROCCA G., FALUSI M., PAOLETTI E., STRATI S., 2001. Resistance to water stress in seedlings of eight European provenances of Pinus halepensis Mill. Ann Forest Sci 58, 663-672.
9. CASTRO M., MARTÍN-VIDE J., ALONSO S., 2005. El Clima de España: pasado, presente y escenarios de clima para el siglo XXI. En: Moreno JM (ed) Evaluación preliminar de los impactos en España por efecto del cambio climático. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Madrid, España, pp. 1-64.
10. CHAMBEL M.R., CLIMENT J., ALÍA R., 2007. Divergence among species and populations of Mediterranean pines in biomass allocation of seedlings grown under two watering regimes. Ann Forest Sci 64, 87-97.
11. CLIMENT J., TAPIAS R., PARDOS J.A., GIL L., 2004. Fire adaptations in the Canary Islands pine (Pinus canariensis) Plant Ecol 171, 185-196.
12. DANJON F., 1994. Stand features and height growth in a 36-year-old maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) provenance test. Silvae Genet 43, 52-62.
13. DICHIO B., XILOYANNIS C., SOFO A., MONTANARO G., 2006. Osmotic regulation in leaves and roots of olive trees during a water deficit and rewatering. Tree Physiol 26, 179-185.
14. FAN S., BLAKE T.J., 1997. Comparison of polyethylene glycol 3350 induced osmotic stress and soil drying for drought simulation in three woody species. Trees-Struct Funct 11, 342-348.
15. FAN S.H., BLAKE T.J., BLUMWALD E., 1994. The relative contribution of elastic and osmotic adjustments to turgor maintenance of woody species. Physiol Plantarum 90, 408-413.
16. FERNÁNDEZ M., GIL L., PARDOS J.A., 1999. Response of Pinus pinaster Ait. provenances at early age to water supply. I. Water relation parameters. Ann Forest Sci 56, 179-187.
17. FERNÁNDEZ M., GIL L., PARDOS J.A., 2000. Effects of water supply on gas exchange in Pinus pinaster Ait. provenances during their first growing season. Ann Forest Sci 57, 9-16.
18. GONZALEZ-MARTINEZ S.C., MARIETTE S., RIBEIRO M.M., BURBAN C., RAFFIN A., CHAMBEL M.R., RIBEIRO C.A., AGUIAR A., PLOMION C., ALÍA R., GIL L., VENDRAMIN G.G., KREMER A., 2004. Genetic resources in maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Aiton): molecular and quantitative measures of genetic variation and differentiation among maternal lineages. For Ecol Manage 197, 103-115.
19. HARFOUCHE A., 2003. Retrospective early test for adult vigor of Pinus pinaster families grown under two water regimes. Implications for early selection. Ann Forest Sci 60, 539-547.
20. HSIAO T.C., ACEVEDO E., FERERES E., HENDERSON D.W., 1976. Stress metabolism: water stress, growth, and osmotic adjustment. Philos Trans R Soc London Sev B 273, 479-500.
21. JONES M.M., TURNER N.C., 1980. Osmotic adjustment in expanding and fully expanded leaves of sunflower in response to water deficits. Aust J Plant Physiol 7, 181-192.
22. KATO Y., HIROTSU S., NEMOTO K., YAMAGISHI J., 2008. Identification of QTLs controlling rice drought tolerance at seedling stage in hydroponic culture. Euphytica 160, 423-430.
23. LAL M., HARASAWA H., TAKAHASHI K., 2002. Future climate change and its impacts over small island states. Climate Res 19, 179-192.
24. LEE C.S., KIM J.H., YI H., YOU Y.H., 2004. Seedling establishment and regeneration of Korean red pine (Pinus densiflora S. et Z.) forest in Korea in relation to soil moisture. For Ecol Manage 199, 423-432.
25. LÓPEZ R., ZEHAVI A., CLIMENT J., GIL L., 2007. Contrasting ecotypic differentiation for growth and survival in Pinus canariensis. Aust J Bot 55, 759-769.
26. LÓPEZ R., RODRÍGUEZ-CALCERRADA J., GIL L., 2009. Physiological and morphological response to wáter déficit in seedlings of fieve provenances of Pinus canariensis: portential to detect variation in drought-tolerance. Trees-Struct Funct 23, 509-519.
27. MORGAN J.M., 1980. Osmotic adjustment in the spikelets and leaves of wheat. J Exp Bot 31, 655-665.
28. MORGAN J.M., 1992. Osmotic components and properties associated with genotype differences in osmorregulation in wheat. Aust J Plant Physiol 19, 67-76.
29. NGUYEN A., LAMANT A., 1989. Variation in growth and osmotic regulation of roots of water-stressed maritime pine (Pinus pinasterAit.) provenances. Tree Physiol 5, 123-133.
30. NGUYEN-QUEYRENS A., BOUCHET-LANNAT F., 2003. Osmotic adjustment in three-year-old seedlings of five provenances of maritime pine (Pinus pinaster) in response to drought. Tree Physiol 23, 397-404.
31. OCDATA'BRIEN E.K., MAZANEC R.A., KRAUSS S.L., 2007. Provenance variation of ecologically important traits of forest trees: implications for restoration. J Appl Ecol 44, 583-593.
32. PARKER J., 1952. Desiccation in conifer leaves: anatomical changes and determination of the lethal level. Bot Gaz 14, 189-198.
33. SAYER M.A.S., HAYWOOD J.D., 2006. Fine root production and carbohydrate concentrations of mature longleaf pine (Pinus palustris P. Mill.) as affected by season of prescribed fire and drought. Trees-Struct Funct 20, 165-175.
34. TURNER D.W., 2006. An index of osmotic adjustment that allows comparison of its magnitude across species and experiments. Physiol Plantarum 127, 478-482.
35. VAXEVANIDOU Z., GONZÁLEZ-MARTÍNEZ S.C., CLIMENT J., GIL L., 2006. Tree populations: bordering on extinction: a study case in the endemic Canary Islands pine. Biol Conserv 129, 451-460.
36. WARWICK N.W.M., THUKTEN (2006) Water relations of phyllodinous and non-phyllodinous Acacias, with particular reference to osmotic adjustment. Physiol Plantarum 127, 393-403.