Myocardial ischemia in acute coronary syndrome: Assessment using 64-MDCT

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 193, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 1097-1106

  Nagao, Michinobu ^a   Matsuoka, Hiroshi ^b   Kawakami, Hideo ^b   Higashino, Hiroshi ^a   Mochizuki, Teruhito ^a   Uemura, Masahiko ^b   Shigemi, Susumu ^b  

^a EHIME UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b Ehime Prefectural Imabari Hospital   (Japan)

Author keywords

Acute coronary syndrome; MDCT; Myocardial ischemia

Indexed keywords

CREATINE KINASE; CREATINE KINASE MB; IOVERSOL; TROPONIN T;

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; ACUTE HEART INFARCTION; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CARDIAC PATIENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CREATINE KINASE BLOOD LEVEL; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIASTOLE; FEMALE; HEART MUSCLE ISCHEMIA; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ST SEGMENT ELEVATION; SYSTOLE; UNSTABLE ANGINA PECTORIS;

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; AGED; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MYOCARDIAL ISCHEMIA; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 70349687295     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.08.1965     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW, Goldstein JA. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46:552-557 (Pubitemid 41040301)
2. Pugliese F, Mollet NR, Runza G, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive 64-slice CT coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. Eur Radiol 2006; 16:575-582 (Pubitemid 44149369)
3. Ferencik M, Nomura CH, Maurovich-Horvat P, et al. Quantitative parameters of image quality in 64-slice computed tomography angiography of the coronary arteries. Eur J Radiol 2006; 57:373-379 (Pubitemid 43254917)
4. Hoffmann U, Nagurney JT, Moselewski F, et al. Coronary multidetector computed tomography in the assessment of patients with acute chest pain. Circulation 2006; 114:2251-2260 (Pubitemid 44801488)
5. Rubinshtein R, Halon DA, Gasper T, et al. Usefulness of 64-slice cardiac computed tomographic angiography for diagnosing acute coronary syndromes and predicting clinical outcome in emergency department patients with chest pain of uncertain origin. Circulation 2007; 115:1762-1768 (Pubitemid 46648613)
6. Hoffmann U, Moselewski F, Nieman K, et al. Noninvasive assessment of plaque morphology and composition in culprit and stable lesions in acute coronary syndrome and stable lesions in stable angina by multidetector computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 47:1655-1662
7. Motoyama S, Kondo T, Sarai M, et al. Multislice computed tomography characteristics of coronary lesions in acute coronary syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 50:319-326 (Pubitemid 47058884)
8. Kitagawa K, Sakuma H, Hirano T, Okamoto S, Makino K, Takeda K. Acute myocardial infarction: myocardial viability assessment in patients early thereafter - comparison of contrast-enhanced MR imaging with resting 201Tl SPECT. Radiology 2003; 226:138-144 (Pubitemid 36163921)
9. Nagao M, Higashino H, Matsuoka H, et al. Evaluation of acute myocardial infarction with late enhancement pattern on MRI compared with 201-Tl and 99m-Tc HMDP dual SPECT images. Invest Radiol 2007; 42:765-770
10. Baks T, Cademartiri F, Moelker AD, et al. Multislice computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of reperfused acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48:144-152 (Pubitemid 43929221)
11. Brodoefel H, Klumpp B, Reimann A, et al. Late myocardial enhancement assessed by 64-MSCT in reperfused porcine myocardial infarction: diagnostic accuracy of low-dose CT protocols in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 2007; 17:475-483 (Pubitemid 46140318)
12. Lessick J, Dragu R, Mutlak D, et al. Is functional improvement after myocardial infarction predicted with myocardial enhancement patterns at multidetector CT? Radiology 2007; 244:736-744 (Pubitemid 47292084)
13. Nieman K, Shapiro MD, Ferencik M, et al. Reperfused myocardial infarction: contrast-enhanced 64-section CT in comparison to MR imaging. Radiology 2008; 247:49-56
14. Nagao M, Matsuoka H, Kawakami H, et al. Quantification of myocardial perfusion by contrast-enhanced 64-slice MDCT: characterization of ischemic myocardium. AJR 2008; 191:19-25 (Pubitemid 351955177)
15. Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, et al.; American College of Cardiology; American Heart Association; Canadian Cardiovascular Society. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to revise the 1999 guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction). J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44:671-719 [Erratum in J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45:1376]
16. Braunwald E, Antman EM, Beasley JW, et al.; American College of Cardiology; American Heart Association. Committee on the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-CT-segment elevation myocardial infarction: summary article - a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina). J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 40:1366-1374
17. Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, et al. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 1975; 51[suppl 4]:5-40
18. Scoblionko DP, Brown BG, Mitten S, et al. A new digital electronic caliper for measurement of coronary arterial stenosis: comparison with visual estimates and computer-assisted measurements. Am J Cardiol 1984; 53:689-693 (Pubitemid 14154677)
19. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, et al.; American Heart Association Writing Group on Myocardial Segmentation and Registration for Cardiac Imaging. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. J Nucl Cardiol 2002; 9:240-245
20. Goto M, Flynn AE, Doucette JW, et al. Cardiac contraction affects deep myocardial vessels predominantly. Am J Physiol 1991; 261[5 Pt 2]: H1417-H1429
21. Merkus D, Vergroesen I, Hiramatsu O, et al. Stenosis differentially affects subendocardial and subepicardial arterioles in vivo. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2001; 280:H1674-H1682 (Pubitemid 32466202)
22. Sabbah HN, Stein PD. Effect of acute regional ischemia on pressure in the subepicardium and subendocardium. Am J Physiol 1982; 242:240-244
23. Chilian WM. Microvascular pressures and resistances in the left ventricular subepicardium and subendocardium. Circ Res 1991; 69:561-570
24. Toyota E, Fujimoto K, Ogasawara Y, et al. Dynamic changes in three-dimensional architecture and vascular volume of transmural coronary microvasculature between diastolic- and systolic-arrested rat hearts. Circulation 2002; 105:621-626 (Pubitemid 34123438)