Is functional improvement after myocardial infarction predicted with myocardial enhancement patterns at multidetector CT?

Radiology

Volumn 244, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 736-744

  Lessick, Jonathan ^a,b   Dragu, Robert ^a,b   Mutlak, Diab ^a   Rispler, Shmuel ^a   Beyar, Rafael ^a   Litmanovich, Diana ^a   Engel, Ahuva ^a,b   Agmon, Yoram ^a,b   Kapeliovich, Michael ^a   Hammerman, Haim ^a,b   Ghersin, Eduard ^a,b  

^a Rambam Health Care Campus ^*  (Israel)

^b TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IOPROMIDE;

ACUTE HEART INFARCTION; ADULT; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTERY OCCLUSION; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HUMAN; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

AREA UNDER CURVE; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CONTRAST MEDIA; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; IOHEXOL; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 34548106423     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2443061397     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Garcia MJ. Could cardiac CT revolutionize the practice of cardiology? Cleve Clin J Med 2005;72:88-89.
2. Siemers PT, Higgins CB, Schmidt W, Ashburn W, Hagan P. Detection, quantitation and contrast enhancement, of myocardial infarction utilizing computerized axial tomography: comparison with histochemical staining and 99mTc-pyrophosphate imaging. Invest Radiol 1978;13:103-109.
3. Doherty PW, Lipton M.I., Berninger WH, Skioldebrand CG, Carlsson E, Redington RW. Detection and quantitation of myocardial infarction in vivo using transmission computed tomography. Circulation 1981;63:597-606.
4. Paul JF, Wartski M, Caussin C, et al. Late defect on delayed contrast-enhanced multidetector row CT scans in the prediction of SPECT infarct size after reperfused acute myocardial infarction: initial experience. Radiology 2005;236:485-489.
5. Nikolaou K, Sanz J, Poon M, et al. Assessment of myocardial perfusion and viability from routine contrast-enhanced 16-detector-row computed tomography of the heart: preliminary results. Eur Radiol 2005;15:864-871.
6. Mahnken AH, Koos R, Katoh M, et al. Assessment of myocardial viability in reperfused acute myocardial infarction using 16-section computed tomography in comparison to magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:2042-2047.
7. Koyama Y, Matsuoka H, Mochizuki T, et al. Assessment of reperfused acute myocardial infarction with two-phase contrast-enhanced helical CT: prediction of left ventricular function and wall thickness. Radiology 2005;235:804-811.
8. Koyama Y, Mochizuki T, Higaki J. Computed tomography assessment of myocardial perfusion, viability, and function. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;19:800-815.
9. Gerber BL, Belge B, Legros GJ, et al. Characterization of acute and chronic myocardial infarcts by multidetector computed tomography: comparison with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance. Circulation 2006;113:823-833.
10. Lardo AC, Cordeiro MA, Silva C, et al. Contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography viability imaging after myocardial infarction: characterization of myocyte death, microvascular obstruction, and chronic scar. Circulation 2006;113:394-404.
11. Elliott MD, Kim RJ. Late gadolinium cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the assessment of myocardial viability. Coron Artery Dis 2005;16:365-372.
12. Bogaert J, Dymarkowski S. Delayed contrast-enhanced MR1: use in myocardial viability assessment and other cardiac pathology. Eur Radiol 2005;15:B52-B58.
13. Kim RJ, Manning WJ. Viability assessment by delayed enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance: will low-dose dobutamine dull the shine? Circulation 2004;109:2476-2479.
14. Grass M, Manzke R, Nielsen T, et al. Helical cardiac cone beam reconstruction using retrospective ECG gating. Phys Med Biol 2003;48:3069-3084.
15. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 2002;105:539-542.
16. Ostrzega E, Maddahi J, Honma H, et al. Quantification of left ventricular myocardial mass in humans by nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. Am Heart J 1989;117:444-452.
17. Comparison of invasive and conservative strategies after treatment with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator in acute myocardial infarction: results of the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) phase II trial. The TIMI Study Group. N Engl J Med 1989; 320:618-627.
18. Rochitte CE, Lima JA, Bluemke DA, et al. Magnitude and time course of microvascular obstruction and tissue injury after acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1998;98:1006-1014.
19. Newell JD, Mayr W, Gerber KH, Higgins CB. Computerized tomographic (CT) appearance of the myocardium after reversible and irreversible ischemic injury. Invest Radiol 1982;17:544-549.
20. Gerber BL, Garot J, Bluemke DA, Wu KC, Lima JA. Accuracy of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in predicting improvement of regional myocardial function in patients after acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 2002;106:1083-1089.
21. Kaul S, Ito H. Microvasculature in acute myocardial ischemia. I. Evolving concepts in pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Circulation 2004;109:146-149.
22. Kaul S, Ito H. Microvasculature in acute myocardial ischemia. II. Evolving concepts in pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Circulation 2004;109:310-315.