In vivo range of motion of the lumbar spinous processes

European Spine Journal

Volumn 18, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 1355-1362

  Li, Guoan ^a   Xia, Qun ^a,c   Wang, Shaobai ^a,b   Passias, Peter G ^a   Kozanek, Michal ^a   Li, Gang ^a   Grottkau, Brian E ^a   Wood, Kirkham B ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge   (United States)

^c TIANJIN HOSPITAL   (China)

Author keywords

Fluoroscopy; In vivo; Kinematics; Lumbar spine; MRI; Spinous process

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IN VIVO STUDY; KINEMATICS; LUMBAR SPINE; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANGE OF MOTION; SPINE DISEASE; SPINE INJURY;

BIOMECHANICS; FEMALE; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, ANATOMIC; MOVEMENT; POSTURE; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; ROTATION; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 70349667396     PISSN: 09406719     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-009-1068-8     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. J Bingham G Li 2006 An optimized image matching method for determining in vivo TKA kinematics with a dual-orthogonal fluoroscopic imaging system J Biomech Eng 128 588 595 10.1115/1.2205865 16813450 10.1115/1.2205865 (Pubitemid 44187319)
2. CM Bono AR Vaccaro 2007 Interspinous process devices in the lumbar spine J Spinal Disord Tech 20 255 261 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3180331352 17473649 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3180331352 (Pubitemid 46701421)
3. A Fisher L Lupu B Gurevitz S Brill E Margolin Y Hertzanu 2001 Hip flexion and lumbar puncture: a radiological study Anaesthesia 56 262 266 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2001.01717-4.x 11251435 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2001.01717-4.x 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7osVOnug%3D%3D (Pubitemid 32197322)
4. A Fujiwara TH Lim HS An N Tanaka CH Jeon GB Andersson VM Haughton 2000 The effect of disc degeneration and facet joint osteoarthritis on the segmental flexibility of the lumbar spine Spine 25 3036 3044 10.1097/00007632-200012010- 00011 11145815 10.1097/00007632-200012010-00011 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7gsFKlsA%3D%3D
5. GR Hanson JF Suggs AA Freiberg S Durbhakula G Li 2006 Investigation of in vivo 6DOF total knee arthroplasty kinematics using a dual orthogonal fluoroscopic system J Orthop Res 24 974 981 10.1002/jor.20141 16596640 10.1002/jor.20141 (Pubitemid 43804932)
6. DH Kim TJ Albert 2007 Interspinous process spacers J Am Acad Orthop Surg 15 200 207 17426291
7. SW Lee KW Wong MK Chan HM Yeung JL Chiu JC Leong 2002 Development and validation of a new technique for assessing lumbar spine motion Spine 27 E215 E220 10.1097/00007632-200204150-00022 11935121 10.1097/00007632-200204150-00022
8. G Li LE DeFrate SE Park TJ Gill HE Rubash 2005 In vivo articular cartilage contact kinematics of the knee: an investigation using dual-orthogonal fluoroscopy and magnetic resonance image-based computer models Am J Sports Med 33 102 107 10.1177/0363546504265577 15611005 10.1177/0363546504265577 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28Xht1yqtLY%3D (Pubitemid 40039565)
9. DP Lindsey KE Swanson P Fuchs KY Hsu JF Zucherman SA Yerby 2003 The effects of an interspinous implant on the kinematics of the instrumented and adjacent levels in the lumbar spine Spine 28 2192 2197 10.1097/01.BRS. 0000084877.88192.8E 14520030 10.1097/01.BRS.0000084877.88192.8E (Pubitemid 37214691)
10. P Neumann Y Wang J Karrholm H Malchau A Nordwall 1999 Determination of inter-spinous process distance in the lumbar spine: evaluation of reference population to facilitate detection of severe trauma Eur Spine J 8 272 278 10.1007/s005860050172 10483828 10.1007/s005860050172 1:STN:280: DyaK1MvhtFKhuw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 29390128)
11. RS Ochia N Inoue SM Renner EP Lorenz TH Lim GB Andersson HS An 2006 Three-dimensional in vivo measurement of lumbar spine segmental motion Spine 31 2073 2078 10.1097/01.brs.0000231435.55842.9e 16915091 10.1097/01.brs.0000231435. 55842.9e (Pubitemid 44246380)
12. JC Richards S Majumdar DP Lindsey GS Beaupre SA Yerby 2005 The treatment mechanism of an interspinous process implant for lumbar neurogenic intermittent claudication Spine 30 744 749 10.1097/01.brs.0000157483.28505.e3 15803075 10.1097/01.brs.0000157483.28505.e3
13. M Siddiqui E Karadimas M Nicol FW Smith D Wardlaw 2006 Effects of X-STOP device on sagittal lumbar spine kinematics in spinal stenosis J Spinal Disord Tech 19 328 333 10.1097/01.bsd.0000211297.52260.d5 16826003 10.1097/01.bsd. 0000211297.52260.d5 (Pubitemid 44284107)
14. M Siddiqui E Karadimas M Nicol FW Smith D Wardlaw 2006 Influence of X Stop on neural foramina and spinal canal area in spinal stenosis Spine 31 2958 2962 10.1097/01.brs.0000247797.92847.7d 17139227 10.1097/01.brs.0000247797. 92847.7d (Pubitemid 44885713)
15. T Steffen RK Rubin HG Baramki J Antoniou D Marchesi M Aebi 1997 A new technique for measuring lumbar segmental motion in vivo: method, accuracy, and preliminary results Spine 22 156 166 10.1097/00007632-199701150-00006 9122795 10.1097/00007632-199701150-00006 1:STN:280:DyaK2s7otFGgsw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 27081631)
16. S Wang P Passias G Li G Li K Wood 2008 Measurement of vertebral kinematics using noninvasive image matching method-validation and application Spine 33 E355 E361 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181715295 18469683 10.1097/BRS. 0b013e3181715295 (Pubitemid 351677631)
17. JF Zucherman KY Hsu CA Hartjen TF Mehalic DA Implicito MJ Martin DR Johnson 2nd GA Skidmore PP Vessa JW Dwyer ST Puccio JC Cauthen RM Ozuna 2005 A multicenter, prospective, randomized trial evaluating the X STOP interspinous process decompression system for the treatment of neurogenic intermittent claudication: two-year follow-up results Spine 30 1351 1358 10.1097/01.brs. 0000166618.42749.d1 15959362 10.1097/01.brs.0000166618.42749.d1 (Pubitemid 41760292)