Measurement of vertebral kinematics using noninvasive image matching method-validation and application

Spine

Volumn 33, Issue 11, 2008, Pages

  Wang, Shaobai ^a,b   Passias, Peter ^a   Li, Gang ^a   Li, Guoan ^a,c   Wood, Kirkham ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge   (United States)

^c HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

6 degree of freedom kinematics; Degenerative changes; Dual fluoroscopes; In vivo spine biomechanics; Lumbar spine; Spine pathology

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANATOMY; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; KINEMATICS; KNOWLEDGE; LABORATORY TEST; MEASUREMENT; MOTION; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SPINE SURGERY; TECHNOLOGY; VALIDATION STUDY; VERTEBRA; WEIGHT BEARING;

ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; RESEARCH DESIGN; SHEEP; SPINE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 43549086673     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181715295     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Heliovaara M, Sievers K, Impivaara O, et al. Descriptive epidemiology and public health aspects of low back pain. Ann Med 1989;21:327-33.
2. Smedley J, Inskip H, Cooper C, et al. Natural history of low back pain. A longitudinal study in nurses. Spine 1998;23:2422-6.
3. Katz JN. Lumbar disc disorders and low-back pain: socioeconomic factors and consequences. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006;889(Suppl 2):21-4.
4. Auerbach JD, Wills BP, McIntosh TC, et al. Evaluation of spinal kinematics following lumbar total disc replacement and circumferential fusion using in-vivo fluoroscopy. Spine 2007;32:527-36.
5. Siddiqui M, Karadimas E, Nicol M, et al. Effects of X-STOP device on sagittal lumbar spine kinematics in spinal stenosis. J Spinal Disord Tech 2006;19:328-33.
6. Wong KW, Luk KD, Leong JC, et al. Continuous dynamic spinal motion analysis. Spine 2006;31:414-9.
7. Kotani Y, Abumi K, Shikinami Y, et al. Artificial intervertebral disc replacement using bioactive three-dimensional fabric: design, development, and preliminary animal study. Spine 2002;27:929-35; discussion 35-6.
8. Zhu Q, Larson CR, Sjovold SG, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of the Total Facet Arthroplasty System: 3-dimensional kinematics. Spine 2007;32: 55-62.
9. Kettler A, Marin F, Sattelmayer G, et al. Finite helical axes of motion are a useful tool to describe the three-dimensional in vitro kinematics of the intact, injured and stabilised spine. Eur Spine J 2004;13:553-9.
10. Miura T, Panjabi MM, Cripton PA. A method to simulate in-vivo cervical spine kinematics using in vitro compressive preload. Spine 2002;27:43-8.
11. SariAli el H, Lemaire JP, Pascal-Mousselard H, et al. In-vivo study of the kinematics in axial rotation of the lumbar spine after total intervertebral disc replacement: long-term results: a 10-14 years follow up evaluation. Eur Spine J 2006;15:1501-10.
12. Ishii T, Mukai Y, Hosono N, et al. Kinematics of the upper cervical spine in rotation: in-vivo three-dimensional analysis. Spine 2004;29:E139-44.
13. Lindsey DP, Swanson KE, Fuchs P, et al. The effects of an interspinous implant on the kinematics of the instrumented and adjacent levels in the lumbar spine. Spine 2003;28:2192-7.
14. Dickman CA, Crawford NR, Tominaga T, et al. Morphology and kinematics of the baboon upper cervical spine. A model of the atlantoaxial complex. Spine 1994;19:2518-23.
15. Lee S, Harris KG, Nassif J, et al. In-vivo kinematics of the cervical spine. Part I: Development of a roentgen stereophotogrammetric technique using metallic markers and assessment of its accuracy. J Spinal Disord 1993;6:522-34.
16. Panjabi MM, White AA III. Basic biomechanics of the spine. Neurosurgery 1980;7:76-93.
17. Panjabi MM, Takata K, Goel VK. Kinematics of lumbar intervertebral foramen. Spine 1983;8:348-57.
18. Goel VK, Clark CR, McGowan D, et al. An in-vitro study of the kinematics of the normal, injured and stabilized cervical spine. J Biomech 1984;17: 363-76.
19. Si-Hoe KM, Teoh SH, Teo J. Radio-translucent 3-axis mechanical testing rig for the spine in micro-CT. J Biomech Eng 2006;128:957-64.
20. Simon S, Davis M, Odhner D, et al. CT imaging techniques for describing motions of the cervicothoracic junction and cervical spine during flexion, extension, and cervical traction. Spine 2006;31:44-50.
21. Gocen S, Havitcioglu H, Alici E. A new method to measure vertebral rotation from CT scans. Eur Spine J 1999;8:261-5.
22. Ochia RS, Inoue N, Renner SM, et al. Three-dimensional in-vivo measurement of lumbar spine segmental motion. Spine 2006;31:2073-8.
23. Kulig K, Powers CM, Landel RF, et al. Segmental lumbar mobility in individuals with low back pain: in-vivo assessment during manual and self-imposed motion using dynamic MRI. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2007;8:8.
24. Karadimas EJ, Siddiqui M, Smith FW, et al. Positional MRI changes in supine versus sitting postures in patients with degenerative lumbar spine. J Spinal Disord Tech 2006;19:495-500.
25. Fazey PJ, Song S, Monsas S, et al. An MRI investigation of intervertebral disc deformation in response to torsion. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2006;21: 538-42.
26. Manenti G, Liccardo G, Sergiacomi G, et al. Axial loading MRI of the lumbar spine. In-vivo 2003;17:413-20.
27. Fujiwara A, Lim TH, An HS, et al. The effect of disc degeneration and facet joint osteoarthritis on the segmental flexibility of the lumbar spine. Spine 2000;25:3036-44.
28. Lee SW, Wong KW, Chan MK, et al. Development and validation of a new technique for assessing lumbar spine motion. Spine 2002;27:E215-20.
29. Fujii R, Sakaura H, Mukai Y, et al. Kinematics of the lumbar spine in trunk rotation: in-vivo three-dimensional analysis using magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Spine J 2007;16:1867-74.
30. Li G, DeFrate LE, Park SE, et al. In-vivo articular cartilage contact kinematics of the knee: an investigation using dual-orthogonal fluoroscopy and magnetic resonance image-based computer models. Am J Sports Med 2005;33: 102-7.
31. Hanson GR, Suggs JF, Freiberg AA, et al. Investigation of in-vivo 6DOF total knee arthoplasty kinematics using a dual orthogonal fluoroscopic system. J Orthop Res 2006;24:974-81.
32. Canny J. A computational approach to edge detection. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Machine Intell 1986;8:679-98.
33. Ge Y, Maurer C, Fitzpatrick J. Surface-based 3-D image registration using the iterative closest point algorithm with a closest point transform. Medical Imag: Image Process 1996;2710:358-67.
34. Bingham J, Li G. An optimized image matching method for determining in-vivo TKA kinematics with a dual-orthogonal fluoroscopic imaging system. J Biomech Eng 2006;128:588-95.
35. Lim TH, Eck JC, An HS, et al. A noninvasive, three-dimensional spinal motion analysis method. Spine 1997;22:1996-2000.
36. Martin H, Werner J, Andresen R, et al. Noninvasive assessment of stiffness and failure load of human vertebrae from CT-data. Biomed Tech (Berl) 1998;43:82-8.
37. Rho JY, Hobatho MC, Ashman RB. Relations of mechanical properties to density and CT numbers in human bone. Med Eng Phys 1995;17:347-55.
38. Moga PJ, Erig M, Chaffin DB, et al. Torso muscle moment arms at intervertebral levels T10 through L5 from CT scans on eleven male and eight female subjects. Spine 1993;18:2305-9.
39. Breau C, Shirazi-Adl A, de Guise J. Reconstruction of a human ligamentous lumbar spine using CT images-a three-dimensional finite element mesh generation. Ann Biomed Eng 1991;19:291-302.
40. Pearcy MJ, Tibrewal SB. Axial rotation and lateral bending in the normal lumbar spine measured by three-dimensional radiography. Spine 1984;9: 582-7.
41. Pearcy MJ. Stereo radiography of lumbar spine motion. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 1985;212:1-45.
42. Haughton VM, Rogers B, Meyerand ME, et al. Measuring the axial rotation of lumbar vertebrae in-vivo with MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:1110-6.